Performance management: Where do we go from here?

Human Resource Management Review

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 81-84

  Budworth, Marie Hélène ^a   Mann, Sara L ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952192068     PISSN: 10534822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.014     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Aguinis H. Performance Management 2009, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
2. Aguinis H., Pierce C.A. Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2008, 29:139-145.
3. Bernardin H.J., Buckley M.R. Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review 1981, 6:205-212.
4. Blanz F., Ghiselli E.E. The mixed standard scale: a new rating system. Personnel Psychology 1972, 2:185-199.
5. Borman W.C. Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance ratings. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63:135-144.
6. Cardy R.L., Dobbins G.H. Performance appraisal: the influence of liking on cognition. Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information Processing 1994, 5:115-140.
7. Cascio W.F., Aguinis H. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: changes, choices, and trends. The Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:1062-1081.
8. Cleveland J.N., Murphy K.R., Williams R.E. Multiple uses of performance appraisal: prevalence and correlates. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:130-135.
9. Colquitt J.A., Conlon D.E., Wesson M.J., Porter C.O.L.H., Ng K.L. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25years of organizational justice research. The Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:425-445.
10. DeNisi A.S., Pritchard R.D. Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: a motivational framework. Management and Organization Review 2006, 2:253-277.
11. DeNisi, A. S., & Sonesh, S. (2010). The appraisal and management of performance at work. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2. Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 255-279). Washington: American Psychological Association.
12. Flanagan J.C. A new approach to evaluating personnel. Personnel 1949, 26:35-42.
13. Flanagan J.C. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 1954, 51:327-358.
14. Ilgen D.R., Feldman J.M. Performance appraisals: a process approach. Research in Organizational Behavior 1983, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
15. Kanfer R., Ackerman P.L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:657-690.
16. Landy F.J., Farr J.L. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 87:72-107.
17. Latham G.P., Almost J., Mann S.L., Moore C. New developments in performance management. Organizational Dynamics 2005, 34:77-87.
18. Latham G.P., Mann S.L. Advances in the science of performance appraisal: implications for practice. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2006, 21:295-338.
19. Latham G.P., Wexley K.N. Behavioral observation scales for performance appraisal purposes. Personnel Psychology 1977, 30:255-268.
20. Latham G.P., Wexley K.N., Pursell E.D. Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60:550-555.
21. Longenecker C., Sims H., Gioia D. Behind the mask: the politics of employee appraisal. The Academy of Management Executive 1987, 1:183-193.
22. Murphy K., DeNisi A. A model of the appraisal process. Performance Management Systems: A Global Perspective 2008, Routledge, New York, NY. A. Varma, P.S. Budhwar, A. DeNisi (Eds.).
23. Peters D.L., McCormick E.J. Comparative reliability of numerically anchored versus job-task anchored rating scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1966, 50:92-96.
24. Pulakos E.D. A comparison of rater training programs: error training and accuracy training. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1984, 69:581-588.
25. Scullen S.E., Mount M.K., Goff M. Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. The Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:956-970.
26. Smith P.C., Kendall L. Retranslation of expectations: an approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1963, 47:149-155.
27. Sulsky L.M., Day D.V. Frame-of-reference training and cognitive categorization: an empirical investigation of rater memory issues. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77:501-510.
28. Wexley K.N., Sanders R.E., Yukl G.A. Training interviewers to eliminate contrast effects in employment interviews. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1973, 57:233-236.
29. Wherry R.J., Bartlett C.J. The control of bias in ratings: a theory of rating. Personnel Psychology 1982, 3:521-551.