Erratum to Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell (Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, (233-242), 10.1177/1745691610369339);Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 233-242

  Schmidt, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cumulative knowledg; Data analysis; Measurement error; Meta analysis; Theory development

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952188543     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691610383517     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33-40.
2. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Becker, M.J. (2009). Model-based meta-analysis. In H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, & J.C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 377-395). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Borenstein, M. (1994). The case for confidence intervals in controlled clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 15, 411-428.
6. Carver, R.P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
7. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
8. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
11. Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170-180.
12. Hauer, E. (1983). Reflections on methods of statistical inference in research on the effects of safety countermeasures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15, 275-285.
13. Hauer, E. (2004). The harm done by tests of significance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 495-500.
14. Hedges, L.V. (2009). Statistical considerations. In H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, & J.C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 37-47). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15. Hunter, J.E., & Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
16. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990a). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 334-349.
17. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990b). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., & Jackson, G.B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 594-612.
21. Le, H., & Schmidt, F.L. (2006). Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: Testing a new meta-analytic procedure. Psychological Methods, 11, 416-438.
22. Le, H., Schmidt, F.L., Harter, J., & Lauver, K. (in press). Revisiting conceptualizations of measurement error in research: Is organizational commitment really different from job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
23. Le, H., Schmidt, F.L., & Putka, D.J. (2009). The multi-faceted nature of measurement error and its implications for measurement error corrections. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 165-200.
24. Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, education, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from metaanalysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
25. Loftus, G.R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 161-171.
26. MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., & Rucker, D.D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40.
27. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
28. Oh, I.-S. (2009). The five factor model of personality and job performance in East Asia: A cross-cultural validity generalization study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
29. Oh, I.-S., Schmidt, F.L., Shaffer, J.A., & Le, H. (2008). The Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) is even more valid than we thought: A new development in meta-analysis and its implications for the validity of the GMAT. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17, 563-570.
30. Ones, D.S. (2008, April). Generalizability of personality-expatriate performance relationships: Findings from the 10 GLOBE cultural clusters. In D.S. Ones & J. Deller (Chairs), Expatriate success: Findings from ten host-cultural clusters around the world. Symposium presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
31. Rothstein, H.R. (2003). Progress is our most important product: Contributions of validity generalization and meta-analysis to the development and communication of knowledge in I/O psychology. In K.R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 115-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, H., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & de Fruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573-605.
33. Schmidt, F.L. (1970). The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Doctor dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
34. Schmidt, F.L. (1971). The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 699-714.
35. Schmidt, F.L. (1972). The reliability of differences between linear regression weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 879-886.
36. Schmidt, F.L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
37. Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
38. Schmidt, F.L. (2008). Meta-analysis: A constantly evolving research integration tool. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 96-113.
39. Schmidt, F.L., Berner, J.G., & Hunter, J.E. (1973). Racial differences in validity of employment tests: Reality or illusion? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 5-9.
40. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
41. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199-223.
42. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1997). Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of statistical significance testing. In L. Harlow, S. Mulaik, & J. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 37-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27, 183-198.
44. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., & Outerbridge, A.N. (1986). The impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439.
45. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E., & Urry, V.W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 473-485.
46. Schmidt, F.L., & Le, H. (2004). Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods [Computer software]. Iowa City: Department of Management and Organization, University of Iowa.
47. Schmidt, F.L., Le, H., & Oh, I.-S. (2009). The methodological and conceptual basis for estimation of correlations between constructs in classical measurement theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48. Schmidt, F.L., Ocasio, B.P., Hillery, J.M., & Hunter, J.E. (1985). Further within setting empirical tests of the situational specificity hypothesis in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 38, 509-524.
49. Schmidt, F.L., Oh, I.-S., & Hayes, T.L. (2009). Fixed vs. random models in meta-analysis: Model properties and comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 97-128.
50. Schmidt, F.L., Oh, I.-S., & Le, H. (2006). Increasing the accuracy of corrections for range restriction: Implications for selection procedure validities and other research results. Personnel Psychology, 59, 281-305.
51. Schmidt, F.L., Oh, I.-S., & Shaffer, J.A. (2008). Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology, 61, 827-868.
52. Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
53. Thompson, B. (2002). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31(3):25-32.
54. Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 423-432.
55. Wilkinson, L., & The APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.