Breakdowns between teachers, educators and designers in elaborating new technologies as precursors of change in education to dialogic thinking

Learning Across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 261-277

  Schwarz, Baruch ^a   de Groot, Reuma ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952185322     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Beach, K. D. (1999). Consequential Transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101-139.
2. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K. and Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113-164.
3. Engeström, Y (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
4. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Suntio, A. (2002). Can a School Community Learn to Master its Own Future? An activity theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells and G. Claxton (eds) Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Freire, P. (1973). Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury.
6. Hakkarainen, K (2003). Can Cognitive Explanation be Eliminated? Science and Education, 12, 671-689.
7. Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Kuhn, D. (2001). How Do People Know? Psychological Science, 12, 1-8.
9. Means, M. L. and Voss, J. F. (1996). Who Reasons Well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-179.
10. Packer, M. J. and Goicoechea, J. (2001). Sociocultural and Constructivist Theories of Learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241.
11. Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and Learning. In N. Muller-Mirza and A.-N. Perret- Clermont (eds) Argumentation and Education - Theoretical Foundations and Practices (pp. 91-126). New York and London: Springer.
12. Schwarz, B. B. and De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a Changing World. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
13. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a Dialogic Understanding of the Relationship Between CSCL and Teaching Thinking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 143-157.