Missed and True Interval and Screen-detected Breast Cancers in a Population Based Screening Program

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 454-460

  Hoff, Solveig Roth ^a   Samset, Jon Helge ^a   Abrahamsen, Anne Line ^b   Vigeland, Einar ^b   Klepp, Olbjørn ^a,c   Hofvind, Solveig ^d  

^a Aalesund Hospital   (Norway)

^b VESTFOLD HOSPITAL TRUST   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^d Cancer Registry of Norway ^*  (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Interval cancer; Review; Screen detected cancer; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS RADIOGRAPHY; NORWAY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79952184681     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Perry N., Broeders M.J., de Wolf C., et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis 2006, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 4th ed.
2. Bulliard J.L., Sasieni P., Klabunde C., et al. Methodological issues in international comparison of interval breast cancers. Int J Cancer 2006, 119:1158-1163.
3. Hofvind S., Geller B., Vacek P.M., et al. Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Epidemiol 2007, 22:447-455.
4. Tornberg S., Kemetli L., Ascunce N., et al. A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. Eur J Cancer Prev 2010, 19:87-93.
5. Moberg K., Grundstrom H., Tornberg S., et al. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers. J Med Screen 1999, 6:35-39.
6. Hofvind S., Skaane P., Vitak B., et al. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2005, 237:437-443.
7. Ciatto S., Catarzi S., Lamberini M.P., et al. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification. Breast 2007, 16:646-652.
8. D'Orsi C.J., Bassett L., Berg W. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Mammography 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. 4th ed.
9. Rosenberg R.D., Yankaskas B.C., Abraham L.A., et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006, 241:55-66.
10. Moberg K., Grundstrom H., Lundquist H., et al. Radiological review of incidence breast cancers. J Med Screen 2000, 7:177-183.
11. van Dijck J.A., Verbeek A.L., Hendriks J.H., et al. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers. Cancer 1993, 72:1933-1938.
12. Harvey J.A., Fajardo L.L., Innis C.A. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993, 161:1167-1172.
13. Duncan K.A., Needham G., Gilbert F.J., et al. Incident round cancers: what lessons can we learn?. Clin Radiol 1998, 53:29-32.
14. Hofvind S., Geller B.M., Rosenberg R.D., et al. Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009, 253:652-660.
15. Tabàr L., Dean P.B. Teaching atlas of mammography 1983, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
16. Kopans D.B. Breast imaging 2007, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. 3rd ed.
17. Tabar L., Tot T., Dean P. Breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Perception, interpretation, histopathologic correlation 2007, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
18. Fischer U., Baum F., Luftner-Nagel S. Direct diagnosis in radiology. Breast imaging 2008, Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.
19. Skaane P. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 2009, 50:3-14.
20. Karssemeijer N., Bluekens A.M., Beijerinck D., et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009, 253:353-358.
21. Vinnicombe S., Pinto Pereira S.M., McCormack V.A., et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 2009, 251:347-358.
22. Freer T.W., Ulissey M.J. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001, 220:781-786.
23. Cupples T.E., Cunningham J.E., Reynolds J.C. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185:944-950.
24. Dean J.C., Ilvento C.C. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:20-28.
25. Morton M.J., Whaley D.H., Brandt K.R., et al. Screening mammograms: Interpretation with computer-aided detection-prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006, 239:375-383.
26. Destounis S.V., DiNitto P., Logan-Young W., et al. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 2004, 232:578-584.
27. Skaane P., Kshirsagar A., Stapleton S., et al. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:377-384.
28. Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:854-859.