The role of need for closure in essentialist entitativity beliefs and prejudice: An epistemic needs approach to racial categorization

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 52-73

  Roets, Arne ^a   Van Hiel, Alain ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHARACTER; CULTURE; FEMALE; GESTALT THEORY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STEREOTYPING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952157829     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: 20448309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466610X491567     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research - conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:
3. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228-235. doi:
4. Billiet, J., & De Witte, H. (1991). Naar racisme neigende houdingen in Vlaanderen: Typologie en maatschappelijke achtergronden [Attitudes towards racism in Flanders: Typology and societal backgrounds]. Leuven: Sociologisch Onderzoeksinstituut (SOI).
5. Brescoll, V., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex difference. Psychological Science, 15, 515-520. doi:
6. Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y., & Lee, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativiy: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25-38). New York: Psychology Press.
7. Coleman, J. M. (2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7, 34-53. doi:
8. Dhont, K., Cornelis, I., & Van Hiel, A. (2010). Interracial public-police contact: Relationships with police officers' racial and work-related attitudes and behaviors. Manuscript in revision.
9. Dhont K., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2010). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Manuscript in revision.
10. Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenberg, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 32, 254-270. doi:
11. Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1-11. doi:
12. Fox, S., & Elraz-Shapira, Y. (2005). Perceived group variability and dispositional need for closure. Current Psychology, 24, 218-230. doi:
13. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Hamilton, D. L. (2007). Understanding the complexities of group perception: Broadening the domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1077-1101. doi:
15. Haslam, N., & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 628-644. doi:
16. Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471-485. doi:
17. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127. doi:
18. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87-100. doi:
19. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:
20. Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of a false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
22. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375. doi:
23. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265. doi:
24. Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Ackerman, R. A., & Russell, S. W. (2009). Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: Practices, principles, and pragmatics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1131-1142. doi:
25. Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702. doi:
26. Kleinpenning, G., & Hagendoorn, L. (1993). Forms of racism and the cumulative dimension of ethnic attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 21-36. doi:
27. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemic and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
28. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundation of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 333-368). New York: Guilford Press.
29. Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
30. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468. doi:
31. Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1988). Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations. Social Cognition, 6, 1-21.
32. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: 'Seizing' and 'Freezing'. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283. doi:
33. Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156-168. doi:
34. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436. doi:
35. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104. doi:
36. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91-126). New York: Academic.
37. Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481. doi:
38. Morton, T. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Postmes, T. (2009). Shifting ground: The variable use of essentialism in contexts of inclusion and exclusion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 35-59. doi:
39. Morton, T. A., & Postmes, T. (2009). When differences become essential: Minority essentialism in response to majority treatment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 656-668. doi:
40. Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 653-664. doi:
41. Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., & West, S. G. (1997). What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1396-1412. doi:
42. Newheiser, A. K., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and moderating effect of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 920-926. doi:
43. No, S., Hong, Y. Y., Liao, H. Y., Lee, K., Wood, D., & Chao, M. M. (2008). Lay theory of race affects and moderates Asian Americans' responses toward American culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 991-1004. doi:
44. Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75. doi:
45. Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). Seizing on the latest: Motivationally driven recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 313-329. doi:
46. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychologica Belgica, 46, 235-252.
47. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 266-280. doi:
48. Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Cornelis, I. (2006). The dimensional structure of the need for closure scale: Relationships with seizing and freezing processes. Social Cognition, 24, 22-45. doi:
49. Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language and social cognition (pp. 11-36). London: Sage.
50. Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 905-921. doi:
51. Ryan, C. S., Bogart, L. M., & Vender, J. P. (2000). Effects of perceived group variability on the gathering of information about individual group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 90-101. doi:
52. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976. doi:
53. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323-2344. doi:
54. Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824-837. doi:
55. Verkuyten, M., & Brug, P. (2004). Multiculturalism and group status: The role of ethnic identification, group essentialism and Protestant ethic. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 647-661. doi:
56. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062. doi:
57. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S. J., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Cambridge: Blackwell.