Ocular irritation reversibility assessment for personal care products using a porcine corneal culture assay

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 708-714

  Donahue, Douglas A ^a   Avalos, Javier ^a   Kaufman, Lewis E ^b   Simion, F Anthony ^a   Cerven, Daniel R ^c  

^a Kao Brands Company   (United States)

^b Scripterra Scientific   (United States)

^c MB Research Laboratories   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative assay; Corneal culture; Cosmetics; Ocular irritation; Ocular reversibility; Porcine cornea

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA INJURY; EPITHELIZATION; EX VIVO STUDY; EYE IRRITATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYGIENE PRODUCT; NONHUMAN; SWINE; TISSUE CULTURE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; CORNEAL DISEASES; COSMETICS; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; IRRITANTS; NECROSIS; ORGAN CULTURE TECHNIQUES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; SUS;

EID: 79952040943     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chan P.K., Hayes A.W. Assessment of chemically induced ocular toxicity: a survey of methods. Toxicology of the Eye, Ear and Other Special Senses 1985, 103-143. Raven Press, New York. A.W. Hayes (Ed.).
2. Draize J.H., Woodard G., Calvery H.O. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1944, 82:377-390.
3. EC, 2004. Manual of Decisions for Implementation of the 6th and 7th Amendments to Directive 67/548/EEC on Dangerous Substances (Directives 79/831/EEC and 92/32/EEC). European Chemicals Bureau, IHCP, European Commission DG-JRC, report no. EUR 20519 EN, updated version of July 2004.
4. ECETOC, 1998. Eye Irritation - Reference Chemicals Data Bank. Technical Report No. 48 (2), European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels.
5. ECVAM, 2007. ESAC statement on the conclusions of the ICCVAM retrospective study on organotypic in vitro assays as screening tests to identify potential ocular corrosives and severe irritants as determined by US EPA, EU (R41) and UN GHS classifications in a tiered testing strategy, as part of a weight of evidence approach. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), European Commission, Ispra, Italy. Available from: http://ecvam.jrc.it.
6. Foreman D.M., Pancholi S., Jarvis-Evans J., McLeod D., Boulton M.E. A simple organ culture model for assessing the effects of growth factors on corneal re-epithelialization. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 62:555-564.
7. Frentz M., Goss M., Reim M., Schrage N.F. Repeated exposure to benzalkonium chloride in the Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test (EVEIT): observation of isolated corneal damage and healing. ATLA 2008, 36:25-32.
8. Kästner W. Local tolerance (animal tests): mucous membranes and skin. Anionic Surfactants: Biochemistry, Toxicology, Dermatology 1992, 127-289. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. second ed. C. Gloxhuber, K. Künstler (Eds.).
9. Lagali N.S., Griffith M., Shinozaki N., Fagerholm P., Munger R. Innervation of tissue-engineered corneal implants in a porcine model: a 1-year in vivo confocal microscopy study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48:3537-3544.
10. Maurer J.K., Parker R.D., Carr G.J. Ocular irritation: microscopic changes occurring over time in the rat with surfactants of known irritancy. Toxicol. Pathol. 1998, 26:217-225.
11. Maurer J.K., Molai A., Parker R.D., Li L., Carr G.J., Petroll W.M., Cavanagh H.D., Jester J.V. Pathology of ocular irritation with bleaching agents in the rabbit low-volume eye test. Toxicol. Pathol. 2001, 29:308-319.
12. Maurice D., Singh T. A permeability test for acute corneal toxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 1986, 31:125-130.
13. McNamee P., Hibatallah J., Costabel-Farkas M., Goebel C., Araki D., Dufour E., Hewitt N.J., Jones P., Kirst A., Le Varlet B., Macfarlane M., Marrec-Fairley M., Rowland J., Schellauf F., Scheel J. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 54:197-209.
14. Obata H., Tsuru T. Corneal wound healing from the perspective of keratoplasty specimens with special reference to the function of the Bowman layer and Descemet membrane. Cornea 2007, 26:S82-S89.
15. OECD, 2009a. Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants. Test Guideline 437, Organisation for Cooperation and Development, adopted 7 September 2009, Paris.
16. OECD, 2009b. Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants. Test Guideline 438, Organisation for Cooperation and Development, adopted 7 September 2009, Paris.
17. Piehl M., Gilotti A., Donovan A., DeGeorge G., Cerven D. Novel cultured porcine corneal irritancy assay with reversibility endpoint. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24:231-239.
18. Raabe H.A., Bruner L., Snyder T., Wilt N., Harbell J.W. Optimization of an in vitro long term corneal culture assay. The Toxicologist 2005, 84:332.
19. Richard N.R., Anderson J.A., Weiss J.L., Binder P.S. Air/liquid corneal organ culture: a light microscopic study. Curr. Eye Res. 1991, 10:739-749.
20. Russell W.M.S., Burch R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique 1959, Methuen & Co. Ltd., London.
21. Russell W.M.S. The three Rs: past, present and future. Anim. Welfare 2005, 14:279-286.
22. SCCP Opinion on hydrogen peroxide, in its free form or when released, in oral hygiene products and tooth whitening products (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products, 18 December 2007) 2007, European Commission, Brussels.
23. Sterzel W. Toxicology of surfactants used in cosmetics. Surfactants in Cosmetics 1997, 568. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Second ed. M.M. Rieger, L.D. Rhein (Eds.).
24. Tanelian D.L., Bisla K. A new in vitro corneal preparation to study epithelial wound healing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1992, 33:3024-3028.
25. Ubels J.L., Edelhauser H.F., Austin K.H. A comparison of healing of corneal epithelial wounds stained with fluorescein or Richardson's stain. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1982, 23:127-131.
26. Van den Berghe C., Guillet M.C., Campan D. Performance of porcine corneal opacity and permeability assay to predict eye irritation for water-soluble cosmetic ingredients. Toxicol. in Vitro 2005, 19:823-830.
27. Wilson S.E., Hong J.W. Bowman's layer structure and function: critical or dispensable to corneal function? A hypothesis. Cornea 2000, 19:417-420.
28. Xu K., Zhang J., Yu F.X. Corneal organ culture model for assessing epithelial recovery after surfactant exposure. Cutaneous Ocul. Toxicol. 2004, 23:29-40.