Influence of loading forces on the vertical accuracy of interocclusal records

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages e31-e35

  Ghazal, Muhamad ^a,b   Kern, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALEPPO   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Aluminum wax; Compressive force; Dental material; Hydrocarbon wax compound; Interocclusal record; Polyether; Polyvinyl siloxane

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; ETHER DERIVATIVE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; RAMITEC; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE; WAX;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ARTICULATORS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ETHERS; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE; VERTICAL DIMENSION; WAXES;

EID: 79951991445     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 361-367.
2. Christensen GJ. Making fixed prostheses that are not too high. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137: 96-98.
3. Vergos VK, Tripodakis AP. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16: 365-368.
4. Chai J, Tan E, Pang IC. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 538-542.
5. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont 2004;13: 150-159.
6. Millstein PL, Hsu CC. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71: 400-403.
7. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77: 141-146.
8. Müller J, Götz G, Bruckner G, Kraft E. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65: 43-50.
9. Müller J, Götz G, Hörz W, Kraft E. Study of the accuracy of different recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63: 41-46.
10. Rudd RW, Rudd KD. A review of 243 errors possible during the fabrication of a removable partial denture: part II. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86: 262-276.
11. Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68: 876-878.
12. Campos AA, Nathanson D. Compressibility of two polyvinyl siloxane interocclusal record materials and its effect on mounted cast relationships. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 456-461.
13. Müller J, Götz G, Hörz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63: 389-395.
14. Murray MC, Smith PW, Watts DC, Wilson NF. Occlusal registration: Science or art? Int Dent J 1999;49: 41-46.
15. Millstein PL, Clark RE. Determination of the accuracy of laminated wax interocclusal wafers. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 327-331.