Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 141-146

  Tripodakis, Aris Petros ^a   Vergos, Vasilis K ^a   Tsoutsos, Andreas G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHER DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ETHERS; EVALUATION STUDIES; JAW RELATION RECORD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0031066081     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70227-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Myers M.L. Centric relation records-historical review. J Prosthet Dent 47 (1982) 141-145
2. Dawson P.E. Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems (1989), Mosby, St. Louis 47-55
3. Millstein P.L., and Clark R.E. Determination of the accuracy of laminated wax interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 50 (1983) 327-331
4. Balthazar-Hart Y., Sandrick J.L., Malone W.F., Mazur B., and Hart T. Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 45 (1981) 586-591
5. Lassila Y. Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 55 (1986) 215-218
6. Lassila V., and McCabe J.F. Properties of interocclusal registration materials. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 100-104
7. Muller J., Gotz G., Horz W., and Kraft E. Study of the accuracy of different recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 41-46
8. Muller J., Gotz G., Horz N., and Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials, I: plaster, impression compound, and wax. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 263-269
9. Muller J., Gotz G., Horz N., and Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials, II: polyester, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 389-395
10. Balthazar Y.M., Ziebert G.J., and Donegan S.J. Effect of interocclusal records on transverse axis position. J Prosthet Dent 52 (1984) 804-809
11. Breeding L.C., Dixon D.L., and Kinderknecht K.E. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 71 (1994) 265-270
12. Strohaver R.A. Comparison of articulator mountings made with centric relation and myocentric position records. J Prosthet Dent 28 (1972) 379-390
13. Kantor M.E., Silverman S.I., and Garfinkel L. Centric relation recording techniques-a comparative investigation. J Prosthet Dent 28 (1972) 593-600
14. Lundeen H.C. Centric relation records: the effect of muscle action. J Prosthet Dent 31 (1974) 244-253
15. Simon R.L., and Nicholls J.I. Variability of passively recorded centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 44 (1980) 21-26
16. Wheeler R.C. Dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 5th ed (1974), Saunders, Philadelphia
17. Assif D., Himel R., and Grajower Y. A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 59 (1988) 672-676
18. La Deane Fattore, Malone W.F., Sandrik J.L., Mazur B., and Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 51 (1984) 152-157
19. Hansen P.A., Huff T.L., and Trebilcock C.E. Centric interocclusal record analyzer. J Prosthet Dent 54 (1985) 851-853
20. Dawson-Saunders B. Trapp RG: basic and clinical biostatistics (1990), Prentice-Hall, New York
21. Mullick S.C., Stackhouse J.A., and Vincent G.R. A study of interocclusal record materials. J Prosthet Dent 46 (1981) 304-307
22. Odman P.A., and Jemt T.M. Accuracy of impression materials in semiclinical model. Dent Mater 4 (1988) 64-67