Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 365-368

  Vergos, Vassilis K ^a,b   Tripodakis, Aris Petros D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; EPOXY RESIN; METAL; POLYETHER; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; POLYVINYLSILOXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WAX;

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; RECORDING; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MATERIALS TESTING; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VERTICAL DIMENSION; WAXES;

EID: 0141739555     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Millstein PL, Hsu CC. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:400-403.
2. Lassila V, Mc Cabe JF. Properties of interocclusal registration materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:100-104.
3. Lassila V. Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:215-218.
4. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz N, Kraft E. Study of the accuracy of different recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:41-46.
5. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz N, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: Plaster, impression compound and wax. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:263-269.
6. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz N, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:389-395.
7. Chai J, Tan E, Pang IC. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:538-542.
8. Berry DC, Singh BP. Daily variations in occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:386-391.
9. Lundeen HC. Centric relation records: The effect of muscle action. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:244-253.
10. Wiskott HWA, Nicholls JI. A fixed prosthodontic centric relation registration technique using resin copings. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:447-452.
11. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:141-146.
12. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Estimating and comparing means. In: Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. New York: Prentice Hall, 1990:99-123.
13. Strohaver RA. A comparison of articulator mountings made with centric relation and myocentric position records. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:379-390.
14. Walls AWG, Wassell RW, Steele JG. A comparison of two methods for locating the intercuspal position (ICP) whilst mounting casts on an articulator. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:43-48.