The time course of anticipatory constraint integration

Cognition

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-42

  Kukona, Anuenue ^a,b   Fang, Shin Yi ^a,b   Aicher, Karen A ^a,b   Chen, Helen ^b   Magnuson, James S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Eye tracking; Sentence processing; Thematic roles

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; MALE; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79951949114     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Allopenna P., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
2. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:502-518.
3. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Now you see it, now you don't: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, 347-386. Psychology Press, New York. J. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
4. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
5. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation. Cognition 2009, 111:55-71.
6. Altmann G.T.M., Mirkovic J. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:583-609.
7. Binder K., Duffy S., Rayner K. The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:297-324.
8. Chambers C., San Juan V. Perception and presupposition in real-time language comprehension: Insights from anticipatory processing. Cognition 2008, 108:26-50.
9. Chambers C., Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:687-696.
10. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. A new methodology for the real time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
11. Cree G.S., McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:163-201.
12. Cree G.S., McRae K., McNorgan C. An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science 1999, 23:371-414.
13. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12:453-459.
14. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:498-513.
15. Delong K., Urbach T., Kutas M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1117-1121.
16. Dienes Z., Altmann G.T.M., Gao S.-J. Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science 1999, 23:53-82.
17. Duffy S., Morris R., Rayner K. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 1988, 27:446-449.
18. Elman J.L. On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:1-36.
19. Elman J.L. An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 7:301-306.
20. Elman J.L. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 1990, 14:179-211.
21. Ferreira F., Clifton C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1986, 25:348-368.
22. Ferreira F., Ferraro V., Bailey K.G.D. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:11-15.
23. Ferretti T.R., Kutas M., McRae K. Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2007, 33:182-196.
24. Ferretti T., McRae K., Hatherell A. Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role concepts. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:516-547.
25. Frazier L., Fodor J. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 1978, 6:291-325.
26. Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic early parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of NAACL (Vol. 2, pp. 159-166), Pittsburg, PA.
27. Hare M., McRae K., Elman J.L. Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:281-303.
28. Hare M., McRae K., Elman J.L. Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:181-224.
29. Hoeks J.C.J., Stowe L.A., Doedens L.H. Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 19:59-73.
30. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 2005, 96:23-32.
31. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:133-156.
32. Kamide Y., Scheepers C., Altmann G.T.M. Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:37-55.
33. Kim A., Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:205-225.
34. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:519-543.
35. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:481-529.
36. Kučera H., Francis W. Computational analysis of present day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
37. Kuperberg G. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 2007, 1146:23-49.
38. Kuperberg G., Sitnikova T., Caplan D., Holcomb P.J. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:117-129.
39. Levy R. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 2008, 106:1126-1177.
40. Levy R., Bicknell K., Slattery T., Rayner K. Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:21086-21090.
41. MacDonald M., Pearlmutter N., Seidenberg M. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
42. Magnuson J.S., Dixon J., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science 2007, 31:133-156.
43. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition. Cognition 2008, 108:866-873.
44. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. Simple recurrent networks and competition effects in spoken word recognition. University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences 2000, 1:56-71.
45. Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N., Dahan D. The microstructure of spoken word recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:202-227.
46. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognition 1978, 10:29-63.
47. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:1-86.
48. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1985, 114:159-188.
49. McClelland J.L., St.John M.F., Taraban R. Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes 1989, 4:287-335.
50. McRae K., Ferretti T., Amyote L. Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes 1997, 12:137-176.
51. McRae K., Hare M., Elman J.L., Ferretti T.R. A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:1174-1184.
52. McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M., Tanenhaus M.K. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:283-312.
53. Mirman D., Dixon J.A., Magnuson J.S. Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:475-494.
54. Movellan J.R., McClelland J.L. The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review 2001, 108:113-148.
55. Myung J., Blumstein S., Sedivy J. Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition 2006, 98:223-243.
56. O'Connor C.M., McRae K., Cree G.S. Conceptual hierarchies arise from the dynamics of learning and processing: Insights from a flat attractor network. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2006, 2577. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
57. Pearlmutter N.J., MacDonald M.C. Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34:521-542.
58. Plaut D.C., Kello C.T. The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. The emergence of language 1999, 381-415. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. B. MacWhinney (Ed.).
59. Shillcock R., Bard E.G. Modularity and the processing of closed-class words. Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting 1993, 163-185. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. G.T.M. Altmann, R. Shillcock (Eds.).
60. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63:129-138.
61. Spivey M.J. The continuity of mind 2007, Oxford University Press, New York.
62. St.John M.F., McClelland J.L. Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence 1990, 46:217-257.
63. Swinney D. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:645-659.
64. Tabor W., Hutchins S. Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:431-450.
65. Tabor W., Galantucci B., Richardson D. Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:355-370.
66. Tanenhaus M.K., Leiman J., Seidenberg M. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:427-440.
67. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M., Eberhard K., Sedivy J. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634.
68. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K. Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. Perspectives in sentence processing 1994, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
69. Van Berkum J.J.A., Brown C.M., Zwitserlood P., Kooijman V., Hagoort P. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:443-467.
70. Wicha N.Y.Y., Moreno E.M., Kutas M. Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1272-1288.
71. Yee E., Sedivy J. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:1-14.