Linking substrate and habitat requirements of wood-inhabiting fungi to their regional extinction vulnerability

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 864-875

  Berglund, Håkan ^a   Hottola, Jenni ^b,c   Penttilä, Reijo ^b,d   Siitonen, Juha ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL; BOREAL FOREST; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; CONIFEROUS TREE; DEAD WOOD; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNGUS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUBSTRATE; VULNERABILITY;

FINLAND;

FUNGI; PICEA;

EID: 79951945247     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06141.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bader, P. et al. 1995. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv. 72: 355-362.
2. Berglund, H. and Jonsson, B. G. 2008. Assessing the extinction vulnerability of wood-inhabiting fungal species in fragmented northern Swedish forests. Biol. Conserv. 141: 3029-3039.
3. Berglund, H. et al. 2009. Quantifying habitat requirements of tree-living species in fragmented boreal forests with Bayesian methods. Conserv. Biol. 23: 1127-1137.
4. Bolker, B. M. et al. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127-135.
5. Burnett, C. et al. 2003. Monitoring current status of and trends in boreal forest land use in Russian Karelia. Conserv. Ecol. 7: 8 .
6. Edman, M. et al. 2004. Local dispersal sources strongly affect colonization patterns of wood-decaying fungi on spruce logs. Ecol. Appl. 14: 893-901.
7. Gärdenfors, U. 2005. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2005The 2005 Red List of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala.
8. Gelman, A. and Hill, J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Gelman, A. et al. 1996. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat. Sinica 6: 733-807.
10. Gelman, A. et al. 2003. Bayesian data analysis. CRC Press.
11. Gu, W. et al. 2002. Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 17: 699-710.
12. Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135: 147-186.
13. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
14. Hanski, I. 2000. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 37: 271-280.
15. Heilmann-Clausen, J. and Christensen, M. 2003. Fungal diversity on decaying beech logs - implications for sustainable forestry. Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 953-973.
16. Holmer, L. and Stenlid, J. 1993. The importance of inoculum size for the competitive ability of wood decomposing fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 12: 169-176.
17. Hottola, J. and Siitonen, J. 2008. Significance of woodland key habitats for polypore diversity and red-listed species in boreal forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2559-2577.
18. Hubbell, S. P. 2005. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct. Ecol. 19: 166-172.
19. Huxel, G. R. and Hastings, A. 1999. Habitat loss, fragmentation, and restoration. Restor. Ecol. 7: 309-315.
20. Jönsson, M. T. et al. 2008. Colonization and extinction patterns of wood-decaying fungi in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J. Ecol. 96: 1065-1075.
21. Kotiranta, H. and Niemelä, T. 1996. Uhanalaiset käävät Suomessa. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, Finland.
22. Kruys, N. et al. 1999. Wood-inhabiting cryptogams on dead Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees in managed Swedish boreal forests. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 178-186.
23. Laasasenaho, J. 1982. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 108: 1-74.
24. Leibold, M. A. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 601-613.
25. Lindén, H. et al. 2000. Large-scale forest corridors to connect the taiga fauna to Fennoscandia. Wildl. Biol. 6: 179-188.
26. Niemelä, T. 2005. Polypores, lignicolous fungi. Norrlinia 13: 1-320 in Finnish with English summary.
27. Penttilä, R. 2004. The impacts of forestry on polyporous fungi in boreal forests. PhD thesis. Univ. of Helsinki, Finland.
28. Penttilä, R. et al. 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 117: 271-283.
29. Penttilä, R. et al. 2006. Consequences of forest fragmentation for polyporous fungi at two spatial scales. Oikos 114: 225-240.
30. Pulliam, H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol. Lett. 3: 349-361.
31. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria .
32. Rassi, P. et al. 2001. The 2000 Red List of Finnish species. Ympäristöministeriö ja Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki in Finnish with English summary.
33. Renvall, P. 1995. Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks in northern Finland. Karstenia 35: 1-51.
34. Rita, H. and Komonen, A. 2008. Odds ratio: an ecologically sound tool to compare proportions. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 45: 66-72.
35. Rouvinen, S. et al. 2002. Coarse woody debris in old Pinus sylvestris dominated forests along a geographic and human impact gradient in boreal Fennoscandia. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 2184-2200.
36. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
37. Siitonen, P. et al. 2005. Effects of forest edges on the distribution, abundance, and regional persistence of wood-rotting fungi. Conserv. Biol. 19: 250-260.
38. Siitonen, J. et al. 2008. Differences in stand characteristics between brook-side key habitats and managed forests in southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 43: 21-37.
39. Stokland, J. and Kauserud, H. 2004. Phellinus nigrolimitatus- a wood-decomposing fungus highly influenced by forestry. For. Ecol. Manage. 187: 333-343.
40. Swets, J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
41. Tasanen, T. 2004. The history of silviculture in Finland from the Mediaeval to the breakthrough of the forest industry in the 1870s. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 920: 1-443 in Finnish with English summary.
42. Virkkala, R. et al. 2000. Metsien ja soiden suojelutilanne metsä- ja suokasvillisuusvyöhykkeittäin valtakunnan metsien 8. inventoinnin perusteella. Suomen ympäristö 395: 1-49.