Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning

New Media and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 75-95

  Gordon, Eric ^a   Manosevitch, Edith ^b  

^a EMERSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b Academic College of Emek Yezreel   (Israel)

Author keywords

augmented reality; Boston; community; deliberation; game; location; Second Life; urban planning; urbanism; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951937668     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444810365315     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abramson PR (1983) Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
2. Albrecht S. (2006) Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet. Information, Communication and Society 9 (1): 62-82.
3. Almond GA, Verba S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Anderson B. (1997) Work, ethnography and system design. In: Kent A, Williams JG (eds) The Encylopedia of Microcomputers. New York: Routledge.
5. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. JAIP 35: 216-24.
6. Barber B. (2003) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Barndt M. (1998) Public participation GIS: Barriers to implementation. Cartography & Geographic Information Systems 25 (2): 105-12.
8. Beckett KL, Shaffer DW (2005) Augmented by reality: The pedagogical praxis of urban planning as a pathway to ecological thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research 33 (1): 31-52.
9. Benkler Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Benson TW (1996) Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards. Communication Quarterly 44 (3): 359-78.
11. Bers MU, Chau C. (2006) Fostering civic engagement by building a virtual city. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 11: 748-70.
12. Brady A. (2004) Rhetorical research: Toward a user-centered approach. Rhetoric Review 23 (1): 57-74.
13. Brody SD, Godschalk DR, and Burby RJ (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (3): 245-64.
14. Brun-Cottan F., Wall P. (1995) Using video to re-present the user. Communications of the ACM 38 (6): 61-71.
15. Burke EM (1979) A Participatory Approach to Urban Planning. New York: Human Sciences Press.
16. Burkhalter S., Gastil J., and Kelshaw T. (2002) A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory 12: 398-422.
17. Clavel P. (1986) The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969-1984. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18. Dahlberg L. (2001) Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota e-democracy. First Monday 6 (3).
19. Davis R. (1999) The Web of Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Delli-Carpini MX, Cook FL, and Jacobs LR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315-44.
21. Devisch O. (2008) Should planners start playing computer games? Arguments from SimCity and Second Life. Planning Theory & Practice 9 (2): 209-26.
22. Entman RM, Herbst S. (2001) Reframing public opinion as we have known it. In: Bennett LW, Entman RM (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Fishkin J. (1996) The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Forester J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Gastil J. (2000) By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26. Gastil J. (2008) Political Communication and Deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Gastil J., Dillard J. (1999) Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication 16: 3-23.
28. Gee JP (2003) What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave.
29. Godschalk DR, Mills WE (1966) A collaborative approach to planning through urban activities. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 32: 86-94.
30. Gordon E., Bogen D. (2009) Designing choreographies for the new economy of attention. Digital Humanities Quarterly [Online] 3. Available at: http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/2/000049.html.
31. Gordon E., Koo G. (2008) Placeworlds: Using virtual worlds to foster civic engagement. Space and Culture 11 (3): 204-21.
32. Gregersen A., Grodal T. (2009) Embodiment and interface. In: Perron B, Wolf MJP (eds) The Video Game Theory Reader 2. London: Routledge.
33. Gutmann A., Thompson D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics, and What Should Be Done About It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Habermas J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Harris T., Weiner D. (1996) GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space, and Environment are Represented in GIS. Santa Barbara: NCGIA Technical Report.
36. Healey P. (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23: 217-34.
37. Hill KA, Hughes JE (1998) Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
38. Jankowski N., Leeuwis C., Martin P., Noordhof M., and Rossum J van (1997) Teledemocracy in the Province: An Experiment with Internet-based Software and Public Debate. Euricom Colloquium. University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
39. Janssen D., Kies R. (2005) Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica 40 (3): 317-35.
40. Kavanaugh AL, Isenhour P., Cooper MC, Rosson M., and Schmitz J. (2005) Information technology in support of public deliberation. In: Besselaar P van den (ed.) Communities and Technologies. New York: Springer Verlag.
41. Kim J., Wyatt RO, and Katz E. (1999) News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication 16: 361-85.
42. Klopfer E. (2008) Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Krumholz N., Clavel P. (1994) Reinventing Cities: Equity Planners Tell Their Stories. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
44. Levy RM (1995) Visualization of urban alternatives. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design 22 (3): 343-58.
45. McAfee N. (2004) Three models of democratic participation. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1): 44-59.
46. McClurg SD (2006) The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 737-54.
47. McLeod JM, Scheufele DA, and Moy P. (1999) Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication 16: 315-36.
48. Manin B. (1987) On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory 15 (3): 338-68.
49. Mathews D. (1994) Politics for the People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
50. Mendelberg T. (2002) The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 151-93.
51. Min SJ (2007) Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication [Online] 12. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/min.html.
52. Nederveen S van (2007) Collaborative design in Second Life. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference World of Construction Project Management, Delft, The Netherlands.
53. Nesson R., Nesson C. (2008) The case for education in virtual worlds. Space and Culture 11 (3): 273-84.
54. Noveck BS (2006) Democracy - the video game: Virtual worlds and the future of collective action. In: Balkin JM, Noveck BS (eds) The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds. New York: New York University Press.
55. Papacharissi Z. (2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society 6 (2): 95-112.
56. Price V., Cappella JN, and Nir L. (2002) Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication 19: 95-112.
57. Rinner C. (2001) Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (6): 847-63.
58. Rinner C., Kessler C., and Andrulis S. (2008) The use of web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32: 386-95.
59. Rixon A., Burn S. (2008) Visualization techniques for facilitating stakeholder decision making in urban planning. E-Government and Community Informatics 4 (2).
60. Rosenbaum E., Klopfer E., and Perry J. (2006) On location learning: Authentic applied science with networked augmented realities. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16(1): 31-45.
61. Ryfe D. (2002) The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication 19: 359-77.
62. Ryfe D. (2005) Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science 8: 49-71.
63. Ryfe D. (2006) Narrative and deliberation in s group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research 34: 72-93.
64. Shirky C. (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
65. Simonsen J., Kensing F. (1997) Using ethnography in contextual design. Communications of the ACM 40 (7): 82-8.
66. Squire KD, Makinster J., Barnett M., Barab AL, and Barab SA (2003) Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education 87: 1-22.
67. Stanley JW, Weare C., and Musso J. (2004) Participation, deliberative democracy, and the internet: Lessons from a national forum on commercial vehicle safety. In: Shane PM (ed) Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet. New York: Routledge.
68. Stromer-Galley J. (2003) Diversity of political conversation on the internet: Users perspectives. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication [Online] 8. Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html.
69. Stromer-Galley J. (2007) Measuring deliberations content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation [Online] 3. Available at: http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art12.
70. Sunstein, C. (2006) Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Wilhelm AG (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
72. Wodak R., Wright S. (2007) The European Union in cyberspace: Democratic participation via online multilingual discussion boards. In: Wodak R, Wright S (eds) The Multilingual Internet Language, Culture and Communication Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Wright S., Street J. (2007) Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media and Society 9: 849-69.
74. Zaller JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.