How Many Proteins are Missed in Quantitative Proteomics Based on MS/MS Sequencing Methods?

Proteomics Insights

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-66

  Mulvey, Claire ^a   Thur, Bettina ^a,b   Crawford, Mark ^a   Godovac Zimmermann, Jasminka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Berufskolleg Hilden   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mass spectrometry; MS MS sequencing; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CELL FRACTIONATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 79951914345     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11786418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/PRI.S5882     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Graumann J, Hubner NC, Kim JB, et al. Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) and proteome quantitation of mouse embryonic stem cells to a depth of 5,111 proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7: 672-83.
2. de Godoy LMF, Olsen JV, Cox J, et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometrybased proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature. 2008;455:1251-4.
3. Cantin GT, Yi W, Lu B, et al. Combining protein-based IMAC, peptide-based IMAC, and MudPIT for efficient phosphoproteomic analysis. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1346-51.
4. Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villen J, et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:10762-7.
5. Meyer B, Papasotiriou DG, Karas M. 100% protein sequence coverage: a modern form of surrealism in proteomics. Amino Acids. 2010 Jul 13. [Epub ahead of print].
6. Geiger T, Cox J, Mann M. Proteomics on an Orbitrap benchtop mass spectrometer using all ion fragmentation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 Jul 7. [Epub ahead of print]
7. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:376-86.
8. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nature Biotechnology. 1999;17:994-9.
9. Usaite R, Wohlschlegel J, Venable JD, et al. Characterization of global yeast quantitative proteome data generated from the wild-type and glucose repression saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: the comparison of two quantitative methods. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:266-75.
10. Qattan AT, Mulvey C, Crawford M, Natale DA, Godovac-Zimmermann J. Quantitative organelle proteomics of MCF-7 breast cancer cells reveals multiple subcellular locations for proteins in cellular functional processes. J Proteom Res. 2010;9:495-508.
11. Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem. 2004;76:4193-201.
12. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem. 2002;74:5383-92.
13. Lu B, Motoyama A, Ruse C, Venable J, Yates JR 3rd. Improving protein identification sensitivity by combining MS and MS/MS information for shotgun proteomics using LTQ-Orbitrap high mass accuracy data. Anal Chem. 2008;80:2018-25.