Automated macrovessel artifact correction in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging using independent component analysis

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 848-857

  Reishofer, Gernot ^a   Koschutnig, Karl ^a,b   Enzinger, Christian ^a   Ischebeck, Anja ^b   Keeling, Stephen ^b   Stollberger, Rudolf ^c   Ebner, Franz ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

bolus tracking; cerebral blood flow; cerebral blood volume; independent component analysis; perfusion weighted MRI

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TISSUE;

CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; CEREBRAL BLOOD VOLUME; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST MRIS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; PERFUSION ABNORMALITIES;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN PERFUSION; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; GRAY MATTER; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; STROKE; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 79951842398     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22660     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ostergaard L,. Cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 3-9. (Pubitemid 38437541)
2. Keston P, Murray AD, Jackson A,. Cerebral perfusion imaging using contrast-enhanced MRI. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 505-513. (Pubitemid 36806100)
3. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A,. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use. Stroke 2002; 33: 1146-1151. (Pubitemid 34293606)
4. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM,. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 555-566.
5. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR,. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 601-610. (Pubitemid 24166815)
6. Simonsen CZ, Ostergaard L, Smith DF, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Gyldensted C,. Comparison of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 411-416. (Pubitemid 30662100)
7. Zierler KL,. Equations for measuring blood flow by external monitoring of radioisotopes. Circ Res 1965; 16: 309-321.
8. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR,. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 715-725. (Pubitemid 26376710)
9. Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR,. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II. Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 726-736. (Pubitemid 26376711)
10. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Chien D,. Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Q 1989; 5: 263-281.
11. Muir KW, Buchan A, von Kummer R, Rother J, Baron JC,. Imaging of acute stroke. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 755-768. (Pubitemid 44205513)
12. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ,. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193: 637-641. (Pubitemid 24366927)
13. Wirestam R, Andersson L, Ostergaard L, Bolling M, Aunola JP, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Holtas S, Stahlberg F,. Assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using different deconvolution techniques. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 691-700. (Pubitemid 30244268)
14. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Viergever MA, van der Grond J, Bakker CJ,. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 1067-1076. (Pubitemid 36627286)
15. Hagen T, Bartylla K, Piepgras U,. Correlation of regional cerebral blood flow measured by stable xenon CT and perfusion MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23: 257-264. (Pubitemid 29138503)
16. Barber PA, Consolo HK, Yang Q, Darby DG, Desmond PM, Lichtenstein M, Tress BM, Davis SM,. Comparison of MRI perfusion imaging and single photon emission computed tomography in chronic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001; 11: 128-136. (Pubitemid 32171172)
17. Wirestam R, Ryding E, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Ostergaard L, Andersson L, Holtas S, Stahlberg F,. Regional cerebral blood flow distributions in normal volunteers: dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI compared with 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 526-530. (Pubitemid 32204319)
18. Carroll TJ, Teneggi V, Jobin M, Squassante L, Treyer V, Hany TF, Burger C, Wang L, Bye A, Von Schulthess GK, Buck A,. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002; 22: 1149-1156. (Pubitemid 35006808)
19. Iida H, Law I, Pakkenberg B, Krarup-Hansen A, Eberl S, Holm S, Hansen AK, Gundersen HJ, Thomsen C, Svarer C, Ring P, Friberg L, Paulson OB,. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow corrected for partial volume effect using O-15 water and PET. I. Theory, error analysis, and stereologic comparison. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 1237-1251. (Pubitemid 30636759)
20. Ernst T, Chang L, Itti L, Speck O,. Correlation of regional cerebral blood flow from perfusion MRI and SPECT in normal subjects. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 349-354. (Pubitemid 29180196)
21. Grandin CB, Bol A, Smith AM, Michel C, Cosnard G,. Absolute CBF and CBV measurements by MRI bolus tracking before and after acetazolamide challenge: repeatability and comparison with PET in humans. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 525-535. (Pubitemid 40719830)
22. Carroll TJ, Haughton VM, Rowley HA, Cordes D,. Confounding effect of large vessels on MR perfusion images analyzed with independent component analysis. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1007-1012. (Pubitemid 34663449)
23. McKeown MJ, Makeig S, Brown GG, Jung TP, Kindermann SS, Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ,. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 1998; 6: 160-188. (Pubitemid 28247339)
24. Arfanakis K, Cordes D, Haughton VM, Carew JD, Meyerand ME,. Independent component analysis applied to diffusion tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 354-363. (Pubitemid 34116805)
25. Calamante F, Morup M, Hansen LK,. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 789-797. (Pubitemid 39314981)
26. Nakai T, Muraki S, Bagarinao E, Miki Y, Takehara Y, Matsuo K, Kato C, Sakahara H, Isoda H,. Application of independent component analysis to magnetic resonance imaging for enhancing the contrast of gray and white matter. Neuroimage 2004; 21: 251-260. (Pubitemid 38115016)
27. Reishofer G, Fazekas F, Keeling S, Enzinger C, Payer F, Simbrunner J, Stollberger R,. Minimizing macrovessel signal in cerebral perfusion imaging using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 278-288. (Pubitemid 46214531)
28. Comon P,. Independent component analysis, A new concept? Signal Process 1994; 36: 287-314.
29. Hyvarinen A, Oja E,. Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw 2000; 13: 411-430. (Pubitemid 30447427)
30. Hyvarinen A,. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1999; 10: 626-634.
31. Helenius J, Perkio J, Soinne L, Ostergaard L, Carano RA, Salonen O, Savolainen S, Kaste M, Aronen HJ, Tatlisumak T,. Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 538-546.
32. Vonken EJ, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA,. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 109-117. (Pubitemid 29362423)
33. Schreiber WG, Guckel F, Stritzke P, Schmiedek P, Schwartz A, Brix G,. Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity: estimation by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 1143-1156. (Pubitemid 28465362)
34. Ostergaard L, Johannsen P, Host-Poulsen P, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Asboe H, Gee AD, Hansen SB, Cold GE, Gjedde A, Gyldensted C,. Cerebral blood flow measurements by magnetic resonance imaging bolus tracking: comparison with [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 935-940.
35. Kudo K, Terae S, Katoh C, Oka M, Shiga T, Tamaki N, Miyasaka K,. Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 419-426. (Pubitemid 36358995)
36. Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Healy MJ, Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Hatazawa J, Herold S, Beany P, Brooks DJ, Spinks T, Rhodes C, Frackowiak RSJ. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990; 113 (Pt 1): 27-47. (Pubitemid 20047108)
37. Yamaguchi T, Kanno I, Uemura K, Shishido F, Inugami A, Ogawa T, Murakami M, Suzuki K,. Reduction in regional cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen during human aging. Stroke 1986; 17: 1220-1228. (Pubitemid 17008960)
38. Alger JR, Schaewe TJ, Lai TC, Frew AJ, Vespa PM, Etchepare M, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Kidwell SC,. Contrast agent dose effects in cerebral dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 52-64.
39. Smith AM, Grandin CB, Duprez T, Mataigne F, Cosnard G,. Whole brain quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements using MRI bolus tracking: implementation and application to data acquired from hyperacute stroke patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 400-410.
40. Mukherjee P, Kang HC, Videen TO, McKinstry RC, Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP,. Measurement of cerebral blood flow in chronic carotid occlusive disease: comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging with positron emission tomography. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 862-871. (Pubitemid 36617416)
41. Wirestam R, Ryding E, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Holtas S, Stahlberg F,. Absolute cerebral blood flow measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a direct comparison with Xe-133 SPECT. MAGMA 2000; 11: 96-103.