Impact on participation and autonomy (IPA): Psychometric evaluation of the persian version to use for persons with stroke

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 59-71

  Fallahpour, Mandana ^a,b   Jonsson, Hans ^a   Joghataei, Mohammad Taghi ^c   Kottorp, Anders ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND REHABILITATION SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

assessment; autonomy; occupational therapy; outcome measure; Participation; Rasch analysis; rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STROKE;

EID: 79951837351     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/11038121003628353     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. ICF Core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med 2004;44(Suppl):135-41. (Pubitemid 39307123)
2. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:221-30. (Pubitemid 43250493)
3. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:559-66. (Pubitemid 46534746)
4. Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, Lawrence JM, Williams JI. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:116-23. (Pubitemid 29099735)
5. Parker CJ, Gladman JR, Drummond AE. The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:1-5. (Pubitemid 27075679)
6. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
7. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569-76. (Pubitemid 41625832)
8. Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:640-9.
9. Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, Schult ML, Townsend E. Exploring experiences of "participation" among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76-85. (Pubitemid 43878886)
10. Wade DT. Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: Impairment, function, quality of life, or value? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:S26-31. (Pubitemid 37169112)
11. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577-87. (Pubitemid 36806191)
12. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, de Groot IJ, van den Bos GA, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA. Handicap questionnaires: What do they assess? Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:97-105. (Pubitemid 29099732)
13. Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, Beelem A, de Groot IJ, de Haan RJ. Beyond disability: Perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:27-35. (Pubitemid 34100548)
14. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27: 507-28. (Pubitemid 40716304)
15. Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35:145-9. (Pubitemid 36681708)
16. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:411-19. (Pubitemid 29425636)
17. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:210-16. (Pubitemid 32147890)
18. Cardol M, Beelen A, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ, de Haan RJ. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1524-9. (Pubitemid 35304127)
19. [NIVEL International homepage on the internet]. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. The questionnaire Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). [cited 27 Sep 2007]; Available online at: Http://www.nivel.nl.
20. Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:451-61.
21. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:970-4. (Pubitemid 36032860)
22. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: Validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:793-803. (Pubitemid 46940504)
23. Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: Internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:156-62.
24. Bond TG, Fox CM Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91. (Pubitemid 32042951)
26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
27. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-5.
28. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, 1: A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
29. Fugl-Meyer AR. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980;7(Suppl):85-93. (Pubitemid 10064413)
30. Kersten P. Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA): Manual to English version: IPA. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research; 2007. Available online at: Http://www.nivel.nl
31. Fisher AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47:319-29.
32. Linacre JM. Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? J Outcome Meas 1998;2:266-83.
33. Fisher WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1992;6:238.
34. Linacre JM. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer software, version 3.63.0. Chicago: Winsteps; 2006. Available online at: http://www.winsteps.com
35. Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas 2002;3:85-106.
36. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994;8:370.
37. Linacre JM. What do infit and outfit mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions 2002;16: 878.
38. Nilsson I, Fisher AG. Evaluating leisure activities in the oldest old. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:31-7. (Pubitemid 43347984)
39. Patomella A, Tham K, Kottorp A. P-drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006;38: 273-9. (Pubitemid 44295589)
40. Linacre JM A user's guide to Winsteps. Rasch-models computer programs. Chicago:Winsteps; 2005. Available online at: Http://www.winsteps.com
41. Wright BD. Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1996;9:472.
42. Colton T. Statistics in medicine. New York: Little, Brown; 1974.
43. Bedell GM. Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:191-205. (Pubitemid 39331173)
44. Haak M, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Fange A, Sixsmith J, Iwarsson S. Home as the locus and origin for participation: Experiences among very old Swedish people. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 2007;27:95-103. (Pubitemid 47123207)
45. Haak M, Fange A, Horstmann V, Iwarsson S. Two dimensions of participation in very old age and their relations to home and neighborhood environments. Am J Occup Ther 2008;62:77-86.
46. Haggstrom A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89-95. (Pubitemid 351403992)