P-Drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 273-279

  Patomella, Ann Helen ^a   Tham, Kerstin ^a   Kottorp, Anders ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Driving ability; Occupational therapy; Performance evaluation; Rasch analysis; Simulator

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREVALENCE; RASCH ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; REGISTER; RELIABILITY; SIMULATOR; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33748051744     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: 16512081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16501970600632594     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Galski, T and Ehle, HT and McDonald, MA and Mackevich, J. (2000) Evaluating fitness to drive after cerebral injury: Basic issues and recommendations for medical and legal communities J Head Trauma Rehabil, 15, pp. 895-908.
2. Lundqvist, A and Gerdle, B and Rönnberg, J. (2000) Neuropsychological aspects of driving after stroke: In the simulator and on the road App Cogn Psychol, 14, pp. 135-150.
3. Korner-Bitensky, NA and Sofer, S and Gelinas, I and Mazer, BL. (1998) Brief or new. Evaluating driving potential in persons with stroke: A survey of occupational therapy practices Am J Occup Ther, 52, pp. 916-919.
4. Rizzo, M and McGehee, DV and Dawson, JD and Anderson, SN. (2001) Simulated car crashes at intersections in drivers with Alzheimer disease Alzheimer Dis Assoc Dis, 15, pp. 10-20.
5. Galski, T and Ehle, HT and Bradley Williams, J. (1997) Off-road driving evaluations for persons with cerebral injury: A factor analytic study of predriver and simulator testing Am J Occup Ther, 51, pp. 352-359.
6. Mazer, BL and Korner-Bitensky, NA and Sofer, S. (1998) Predicting ability to drive after stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79, pp. 743-750.
7. AkinwuntanAE, DeWeerdtW, FeysH, BatenG, ArnoP, KiekensC. Reliability of a road test after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003:1792-1796.
8. Akinwuntan, AE and Feys, H and DeWeerdt, W and Pauwels, J and Baten, G and Strypstein, E. (2002) Determinants of driving after stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83, pp. 334-341.
9. Merbitz, C and Morris, J and Grip, JC. (1989) Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, pp. 308-312.
10. Patomella, A and Caneman, G and Kottorp, A and Tham, K. (2004) Identifying scale and person response validity of a new assessment of driving ability Scand J Occup Ther, 11, pp. 70-77.
11. Fisher, AG. (1998) Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework: 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture Am J Occup Ther, 52, pp. 509-521.
12. Kielhofner, G.(2002) Model of human occupation: Theory and application Third edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13. Crepeau, E.(2003) Analysing occupation and activity: A way of thinking about occupational performance Tenth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
14. Michon, J.(1985) A critical view of driver behavioural models: What do we know, what should we do?. New York: Plenium Press.
15. Linacre, JM. (1994) Sample size and item calibration stability Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7, pp. 328.
16. Linacre, JM.(2005) Winsteps-Rasch Model computer program. Chicago: Winsteps.com.
17. Fisher, AG. (1993) The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis Am J Occup Ther, 47, pp. 319-329.
18. Wright, BD and Linacre, JM. (1994) Reasonable mean-square fit values Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, pp. 370.
19. Kottorp, A and Bernspang, B and Fisher, AG. (2003) Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities J Intellect Disabil Res, 47, pp. 597-605.
20. Tham, K and Bernspang, B and Fisher, AG. (1999) Development of the assessment of awareness of disability Scand J Occup Ther, 6, pp. 184-190.
21. LinacreJM. Guidelines for rating scales. In: Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar. Chicago: MESA Research Note #2; 1997.
22. Linacre, JM. (1998) Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? J Outcome Meas 2, pp. 266-283.
23. Reckase, M. (1979) Unifactor Latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications J Educ Stats 4, pp. 207-230.
24. Wright, BD. (1996) Reliability and separation Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, pp. 472.
25. PatomellaA, KottorpA. An evaluation of driving ability in a simulator. A good predictor of driving ability after stroke? In Driving assessment. Portland: Maine, US; 2005.
26. Tesio, L. (2003) Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research J Rehabil Med, 35, pp. 105-115.
27. Bond, T and Fox, C.(2001) Applying The Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Wright, BD and Stone, MH.(1979) Best test design. Chicago: Mesa Press.
29. Lundqvist, A. (2001) Neuropsychological aspects of driving characteristics Brain Inj, 15, pp. 981-994.
30. Lundqvist, A and Rönnberg, J. (2001) Driving problems and adaptive driving behaviour after brain injury: A qualitative assessment Neuropsychol Rehabil, 11, pp. 171-185.
31. The National Stroke Registry. Analytic Report for 2003. The County Council of Västerbotten.
32. Körkortshavare efter behörighet [homepage online] Borlänge: Vägverket [updated 2005 March 20]. Availible from: URL: http://www.vv.se/templates/page3wide_4015.aspx
33. Christie, N. (1996) Assessing driving fitness following brain injury or illness: A research review TRL Report, 208, pp. 1-21.