Leaf traits and herbivory as indicators of ecosystem function

Current Science

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 313-320

  Dubey, Prajjwal ^a   Sharma, Gyan P ^a,b   Raghubanshi, A S ^a   Singh, J S ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Grazing; Litter decomposition; Nutrient dynamics; Plant functional types

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951815202     PISSN: 00113891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Steffen, W. L., Walker, B. H., Ingram, J. S. I. and Koch, G. W., Global change and terrestrial ecosystems, IGBP Report No. 21, IGBP-ICSU, Stockholm, 1992.
2. Chapin, F. S. III, Syndonia, B. H. M., Hobbie, S. E. and Zhong, H., Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of Arctic vegetation to global change. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7, 347-358.
3. Díaz, S. and Cabido, M., Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J. Veg. Sci., 1997, 8, 463-474.
4. Gitay, H. and Noble, I. R., What are functional types and how should we seek them? In Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change (eds Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. and Woodward, F. I.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 3-19.
5. Grime, J. P. et al., Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos, 1997, 79, 259-281.
6. Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. and Forbes, D., Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1997, 12, 474-478.
7. Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. and Woodward, F. I. (eds). Plant Functional Types, Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
8. Steffen, W. L., Cramer, W., Plochl, M. and Bugmann, H., Global vegetation models: incorporating transient changes to structure and composition. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7, 321-328.
9. McIntyre, S., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S. and Cramer, W., Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics - Introduction J. Veg. Sci., 1999, 10, 604-608.
10. Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. A., Assembly rules as general constraints on community composition. In Ecological Assembly Rules; Perspectives, Advances, Retreats (eds Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. A.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 251-271.
11. Lavorel, S. and Garnier, E., Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revising the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol., 2002, 16, 545-556.
12. Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al., Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measuremens of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot., 2003, 51, 335-380.
13. Díaz, S. et al., The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J. Veg. Sci., 2004, 15, 295-304.
14. Raunkiaer, C., Plant Life Forms, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1937.
15. Grime, J. P., Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat., 1977, 111, 169-1194.
16. Grime, J. P., Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, Wiley, Chichester, 2001, 2nd edn.
17. Noble, I. R. and Slatyer, R. O., The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbance. Vegetation, 1980, 43, 5-21.
18. Noble, I. R. and Gitay, H. A., A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7, 329-336.
19. Box, E. O., Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7, 309-320.
20. Chapin, F. S. III, Functional role of growth forms in ecosystems and global processes. In Scaling Physiology Processes: Leaf to Globe (eds Ehleringer, J. R. and Field, C. B.), Academic Press, San Diego, 1993, pp. 287-312.
21. Díaz, S. et al., Plant traits responses to grazing: a global synthesis. Glob. Change Biol., 2007, 13, 313-341.
22. Díaz, S., Noy-Meir, I. and Cabido, M., Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? J. Appl. Ecol., 2001, 38, 497-508.
23. Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Garnier, E., Harrison, S. P., McIntyre, S. and Pausas, J. G., Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the holy grail? In Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. Global Change - The IGBP Series, Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 149-164.
24. Devineau, J. L. and Fournier, A., To what extent can simple plant biological traits account for the response of the herbaceous layer to environmental changes in fallow-savanna vegetation (West Burkina Faso, West Africa)? Flora, 2005, 200, 361-375.
25. Vesk, P. A. and Westoby, M., Predicting plant species' responses to grazing. J. Appl. Ecol., 2001, 38, 897-909.
26. Hodgson, J. G., Wilson, P. J., Hunt, R., Grime, J. P. and Thompson, K., Allocating C-S-R plant functional types: a soft approach to a hard problem. Oikos, 1999, 85, 282-294.
27. Wardle, D. A. and Bardgett, R. D., Human-induced changes in large herbivorous mammal density: the consequences for decomposers. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2004, 2, 145-153.
28. Kazakou, E., Vile, D., Shiply, B., Gallet, C. and Garnier, E., Co-variations in litter decomposition, leaf traits and plant growth in species from a Mediterranean old-field succession. Funct. Ecol., 2006, 20, 21-30.
29. Quested, H., Eriksson, O., Fortunel, C. and Garnier, E., Plant traits relate to whole-community litter quality and decomoposition following land use change. Funct. Ecol., 2007, 21, 1003-1183.
30. Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W. and Anderson, J. M., Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems, Blackwell Science Publication, Oxford UK, 1979.
31. Cornelissen, J. H. C. and Thompson, K., Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytol., 1997, 135, 109-114.
32. Huffman, B., Glossary. 2007, Retrived from http://www.ultimateungulate.com/glossary.html.
33. Campbell, N. A., Biology, Benjamin Cummings, New York, 1996, 4th edn.
34. Anon., Nechako White Sturgeon Recovery Initiative, 2009; http://www.nechakowhitesturgeon.org/sturgeon/glossary/index.php.
35. Milchunas, D. G. and Lauenroth, W. K., Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol. Monogr., 1993, 63, 327-366.
36. van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. and Verkaar, H. J., Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos, 1988, 51, 355-363.
37. Díaz, S., Acosta, A. and Cabido, M., Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimes. J. Veg. Sci., 1992, 3, 689-696.
38. Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S. and Grigulis, K., Plant response to disturbance in a Mediterranean grassland: how many functional groups? J. Veg. Sci., 1999, 10, 661-672.
39. McIntyre, S. and Lavorel, S., Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. J. Ecol., 2001, 89, 209-226.
40. Vesk, P. A., Leishman, M. R. and Westoby, M., Simple traits do not predict grazing response in Australian dry shrublands and woodlands. J. Appl. Ecol., 2004, 41, 22-31.
41. Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A. and Wright, I. J., Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 2002, 33, 125-159.
42. Keddy, P. A., Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive ecology. J. Veg. Sci., 1992, 3, 157-164.
43. Gaudet, C. L. and Keddy, P. A., Competitive performance and species distribution in shoreline plant communities: a comparative approach. Ecology, 1995, 76, 280-291.
44. Noy-Meir, I., Gutman, M. and Kaplan, Y., Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection. J. Ecol., 1989, 77, 290-310.
45. McIntyre, S., Lavorel, S. and Tremont, R., Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. J. Ecol., 1995, 83, 31-44.
46. Sammul, M., Kull, K., Oksanen, L. and Veromann, P., Competition intensity and its importance: results of field experiments with Anthoxanthum odoratum. Oecologia, 2000, 125, 18-25.
47. Coughenour, M. B., Graminoid responses to grazing by large herbivores: adaptations, exaptations and interacting processes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 1985, 72, 852-863.
48. Cleve, V. K., Chapin, F. S. III, Dyrness, C. T. and Viereck. L. A., Element cycling in taiga forests: state-factor control. Bioscience, 1991, 41, 78-88.
49. Chapin, F. S. III, Walker, L. R., Fastie, C. L. and Sharman, L. C., Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecol. Monogr., 1994, 64, 149-175.
50. Fastie, C. L., Causes and ecosystem consequences of multiple pathways of primary succession at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecology, 1995, 76, 1899-1916.
51. Klimesova, J., Vít, L., Francesco, de Bello and van Groenendael, J. M., Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits. Preslia, 2008, 80, 245-253.
52. Vera, F. W. M., Grazing Ecology and Forest History, Cabi Publishing, Wallingford, 2000.
53. Bakker, J. P., Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989.
54. Osem, Y., Perevolotsky, A. and Kigel, J., Site productivity and plant size explain the response of annual species to grazing exclusion in a Mediterranean semi-arid rangeland. J. Ecol., 2004, 92, 297-309.
55. O'Reagain, P. J. and Mentis, M. T., The effect of plant structure on the acceptability of different grass species to cattle. J. Grassland Soc. S. Afr., 1989, 6, 163-169.
56. O'Reagain, P. J., Plant structure and the acceptability of different grasses to sheep. J. Range Manage., 1993, 46, 232-236.
57. Binkley, D. and Sollins, P., Factors determining differences in soil pH in adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1990, 54, 1427-1433.
58. Finzi, A. C., van Breemen, N. and Canham, C. D., Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol. Appl., 1998, 8, 440-446.
59. Finzi, A. C., van Breemen, N. and Canham, C. D., Canopy treesoil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecol. Appl., 1998, 8, 447-454.
60. Coley, P. D., Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense. Oecologia, 1988, 74, 531-536.
61. Chapin, F. S. III, Effect of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptual framework for the consequences of global change. Ann. Bot., 2003, 91, 455-463.
62. Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D. and Muratore, J. F., Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology, 1982, 63, 621-626.
63. Hobbie, S., Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol., 1992, 7, 336-339.
64. Pontes, L. Da S., Soussana, J.-F., Louault, F., Andueza, D. and Carrere, P., Leaf traits affect the above-ground productivity and quality of pasture grasses. Funct. Ecol., 2007, 21, 844-853.
65. Belsky, A. J., Effect of grazing, competition, disturbance and fire on species composition and diversity in grassland communities. J. Veg. Sci., 1992, 3, 187-200.
66. Prach, K., Pyšek, P. and Šmilauer, P., Changes in species traits during succession: a search for pattern. Oikos, 1997, 79, 201-205.
67. Bello, F. D., Leps, J. and Sebastia, M. T., Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean. J. Appl. Ecol., 2005, 42, 824-833.
68. Harguindeguy, P., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Vendramini, F., Cabido, M. and Castellanos, A., Plant and soil chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil, 2000, 218, 21-30.
69. Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al., Leaf digestibility and litter decomposability are related in a wide range of subarctic plant species and types. Funct. Ecol., 2004. 18, 779-786.
70. Cunningham, S. A., Summerhayes, B. and Westoby, M., Evolutionary divergences of leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. Ecol. Monogr., 1999, 69, 569-588.
71. Reich, P. B., Ellsworth, D. S., Walters, M. B., Vose, G. C., Volin, J. C. and Bowman, W. D., Generality of leaf traits relationship: a test across six biomes. Ecology, 1999, 80, 1955-1969.
72. Wilson, P. J., Thompson, K. and Hodgson, J. G., Specific leaf area and leaf matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytol., 1999, 143, 155-162.
73. Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. and Ellsworth, D. S., From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, 94, 13730-13734.
74. Poorter, H. and Garnier, E., Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components. In Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology (eds Pugnaire, F. I. and Valladares, F.), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1999, pp. 81-120.
75. Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. and Ellsworth, D. S., Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr., 1992, 62, 365-392.
76. Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al., Leaf structure and defense control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional flora on two continents. New Phytol., 1999, 143, 191-200.
77. Aerts, R. and Chapin, F. S. III, The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evolution of processes and patterns and patterns. Adv. Ecol. Res., 2000, 30, 1-67.
78. Singh, V. P. and Singh, J. S., Man and forest: a case study from the dry tropics of India. Environ. Conserv., 1989, 16, 129-136.
79. Semenova, G. V. and van der Maarel, E., Plant functional types: a strategic perspective. J. Veg. Sci., 2000, 11, 917-922.
80. Westoby, M., Jurado, E. and Leishman, M. R., Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends. Ecol. Evol., 1992, 7, 368-372.
81. Thompson, K., Hillier, S. H., Grime, J. P., Bossard, C. C. and Band, S. R., A functional analysis of a limestone grassland community. J. Veg. Sci., 1996, 7, 371-380.
82. Westoby, M., A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil, 1998, 199, 213-227.
83. Gentry, A. H., Phytogeographic pattern in northwest South America and southern Central America as evidence for a Choco refugium. In Biological Diversification in the Tropics (ed Prance, G. T.), Columbia University Press, New York, 1980, pp. 112-136.
84. Mayer, C., Pollination services under different grazing intensities. Insect Sci. Appl., 2004, 24, 95-103.
85. Hadar, L., Noy-Meir, I. and Perevolotsky, A., The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species. J. Veg. Sci., 1999, 10, 673-682.
86. Pedersen, C. and Post, E., Interactions between herbivory and warming in aboveground biomass production of arctic vegetation. BMC Ecol., 2008, 8, 17.
87. Peco, B., de Pablos, I., Traba, J. and Levassor, C., The effect of grazing abandonment on species composition and functional traits: the case of dehesa grasslands. Basic Appl. Ecol., 2005, 6, 175-183.
88. Ferraro, D. O. and Oesterheld, M., Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review. Oikos, 2002, 98, 125-133.
89. Briske, D. D., Strategies of plant survival in grazed systems: a functional interpretation. In The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems (eds Hodgson, J. and Illius, A. W.), Cap International, 1996, pp. 37-67.
90. Fortunel, C. et al., Leaf traits capture the effects of land use changes and climate on litter decomposability of grasslands across Europe. Ecology, 2009, 90, 598-611.