Inverse dynamics compensation via 'simulation of feedback control systems'

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering

Volumn 225, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 137-153

  Tagawa, Y ^a   Tu, J Y ^b   Stoten, D P ^c  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adaptive control; feedback control simulation; feedforward control; inverse dynamics; inverse problem; non linear system

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL; APPROXIMATE INVERSE; BASIC IDEA; CONTROL SIMULATION; FEED-FORWARD; FEEDBACK CONTROL SIMULATION; FORWARD DYNAMIC MODEL; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES; INVERSE DYNAMICS; NON-LINEAR; NONLINEARITIES; PRACTICAL PROBLEMS; SERVOHYDRAULIC; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; TEST RIGS; PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTATIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; FEEDFORWARD CONTROL; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 79951779496     PISSN: 09596518     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09596518JSCE1050     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Miyamoto, H., Kawato, M., Setoyama, T., and Suzuki, R. Feedback-error-learning neural network for trajectory control of a robotic manipulator. Neural Network., 1988, 1(3), 251-265. (Pubitemid 18653347)
2. Boukezzoula, R., Galichet, S., and Foulloy, L. Nonlinear internal model control: application of inverse model based fuzzy control. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2003, 11(6), 814-829.
3. Dorf, R. C. and Bishop, R. H. Modern control systems, edition 9, 2001 (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA).
4. Lee, T. S. and Lin, Y. J. An investigation of numerical computations for inverse dynamics of robotic systems. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., 1992, 2, 1476-1480.
5. Su, Z. and Khorasani, K. A neural-network-based controller for a single-link flexible manipulator using the inverse dynamics approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2001, 48(6), 1074-1086. (Pubitemid 33149160)
6. Tevatia, G. and Schaal, S. Inverse kinematics for humanoid robots. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2000, 1, 294-299.
7. Tagawa, Y. and Fukui, K. Inverse dynamics calculation of nonlinear model using low sensitivity compensator. In Proceedings of Dynamics and Design Conference, 1994, pp. 185-188.
8. Kajiwara, K., Chung, Y. L., Enokida, R., Ji, X., Nagae, T., Fukuyama, K., Inoue, T., Nakashima, M., and Hidaka, T. System identification and seismic responses in elastic range (E-Defense shaking table test for evaluation of seismic performance of high-rise building part 4). In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Japan B-1, 2008, Hiroshima, pp. 829-830.
9. Ji, X., Kajiwara, K., Nagae, T., Enokida, R., and Nakashima, M. A substructure shaking table test for reproduction of earthquake responses of highrise buildings. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn., 2009, 38(12), 1381-1399.
10. Ogawa, N., Ohtani, K., Katayama, T., and Shibata, H. Construction of a three-dimensional, large-scale shaking table and development of core technology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 2001, 359, 1725-1751.
11. Tagawa, Y. and Kajiwara, K. Controller development for the E-Defense shaking table. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2007, 221(I12), 171-181. DOI: 10.1243/09596518JSCE331 (Pubitemid 46955869)
12. Tu, J. Y., Lin, P. Y., Stoten, D. P., and Li, G. Testing of dynamically substructured, base-isolated systems using adaptive control techniques. Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn., 2010, 39(6), 661-681.
13. Stoten, D. P. and Hyde, R. A. Adaptive control of dynamically substructured systems: The singleinput single-output case. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2006, 220(I2), 63-79, DOI: 10.1243/09596518JSCE171.
14. Kyrychko, Y. N., Blyuss, K. B., Gonzalez-Buelga, A., Hogan, S. J., and Wagg, D. J. Real-time dynamic substructuring in a coupled oscillator-pendulum system. Proc. R. Soc. A, 2006, 462, 1271-1294. (Pubitemid 44922117)
15. Zhou, K., Doyle, J., and Glover, K. Robust and optimal control, 1996 (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA).
16. Tagawa, Y., Tagawa, R., and Stoten, D. P. Characteristic transfer function matrix-based linear feedback control system analysis and synthesis. Int. J. Contr., 2009, 82(4), 585-602.
17. Stoten, D. P. A minimal controller synthesis adaptive algorithm for environmental systems. Sci. Techn. Froid, 1989, 277-286.
18. Stoten, D. P. and Benchoubane, H. Robustness of a minimal controller synthesis algorithm. Int. J. Contr., 1990, 51(4), 851-861. (Pubitemid 20674197)
19. Stoten, D. P. and Neild, S. A. The error-based minimal control synthesis algorithm with integral action. Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2003, 217(I3), 187-201.