Testing of dynamically substructured, base-isolated systems using adaptive control techniques

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 661-681

  Tu, J Y ^a   Lin, P Y ^b   Stoten, D P ^a   Li, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adaptive control; Dynamic substructuring; Minimal control synthesis algorithm; MR damper; Roller pendulum system; Structural system testing

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING; CONTROL NONLINEARITIES; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROLLERS; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DAMPING; DYNAMICS; PENDULUMS; QUALITY CONTROL; ROLLERS (MACHINE COMPONENTS); STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEM THEORY; TIME VARYING CONTROL SYSTEMS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL; MINIMAL CONTROL SYNTHESIS; MR DAMPERS; PENDULUM SYSTEM; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 77954526022     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.962     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ramallo JC, Johnson EA, Spencer Jr BF. 'Smart' base isolation systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128(10):1088-1099.
2. Skinner RI, Robinson WH, McVerry GH. An Introduction to Seismic Isolation. Wiley: Chichester, England, 1993.
3. Naeim F, Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Structures: From Theory to Practice. Wiley: Chichester, England, 1999.
4. Jangid RS, Londhe YB. Effectiveness of elliptical rolling rods for base isolation. Journal of Structural Engineering 1998; 124(4):469-472.
5. Iiba M, Midorikawa M, Yamanouchi H, Myslimaj B. Three dimensional shaking table tests on seismic behavior of isolators for houses. Proceedings of the 30-th Joint Meeting of U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, Tsukuba, Japan, 1999.
6. Chung LL, Yang CY, Chen HM, Lu LY. Dynamic behavior of nonlinear rolling isolation system. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16(1):32-54.
7. Lin TW, Hone CC. Base isolation by free rolling rods under basement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22(3):261-273.
8. Lin TW, Chern CC, Hone CC. Experimental study of base isolation by free rolling rods. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24(12):1645-1650.
9. Lin PY, Roschke PN, Loh CH, Cheng CP. Semi-active controlled base-isolation system with magnetorheological damper and pendulum system. Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004.
10. Lin PY. Shaking table test of a smart base-isolation system with MR damper. Fourth World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, San Diego, CA, U.S.A., 2006.
11. Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthquake Spectra 1990; 6(2):317-333.
12. Zhou Q, Lu X, Wang Q, Feng D, Yao Q. Dynamic analysis on structures base-isolated by a ball system with restoring property. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(8):773-791.
13. Shook D, Lin PY, Lin TK, Roschke PN. A comparative study in the semi-active control of isolated structures. Smart Materials and Structures 2007; 16:1433-1446.
14. Murnal P, Sinha R. Earthquake resistant design of structures using the variable frequency pendulum isolator. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128:870-880.
15. Sahasrabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S. Experimental study of sliding base-isolated buildings with magnetorheological dampers in near-fault earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering 2005; 131(7):1025-1034.
16. Ramallo JC, Yoshioka H, Spencer Jr BF. A two-step identification technique for semiactive control systems. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2004; 11(4):273-289.
17. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA. Smart base-isolated benchmark building part IV: Phase II sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15(5):657-672.
18. Lin PY, Roschke P, Loh CH. System identification and real application of a smart magneto-rheological damper. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Limassol, Cyprus, 2005.
19. Williams MS, Blakeborough A. Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: an introductory review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2001; 359:1651-1669.
20. Darby AP, Blakeborough A, Williams MS. Improved control algorithm for real-time substructure testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:431-448.
21. Nakashima M, Masaoka N. Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:393-420.
22. Stoten DP, Hyde RA. Adaptive control of dynamically substructured systems: the single-input single-output case. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2006; 220:63-79.
23. Tagawa Y, Fukui K. Inverse dynamics calculation of nonlinear model using low sensitivity compensator. Proceedings of Dynamics and Design Conference, Akita, 1994; 185-188.
24. Stoten DP, Tu JY, Li G. Adaptive control of generalised dynamically substructured systems. Seventeenth IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 2008; 14090-14095.
25. Stoten DP, Tu JY, Li G. Synthesis and control of generalised dynamically substructured systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2009; 223:371-392.
26. Tu JY. Control of nonlinear system using the inverse dynamics compensation via simulation (IDCS) method. M.Sc. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K., 2006.
27. Ji X, Kajiwara K, Nagae T, Enokida R, Nakashima M. A substructure shaking table test for reproduction of earthquake responses of high-rise buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009; 36: 1381-1399.
28. Stoten DP. Implementation of MCS on a servohydraulic testing machine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 1992; 206:189-194.
29. Stoten DP. A minimal controller synthesis adaptive algorithm for environmental systems. Science et Technique du Froid, 1989; 277-286.
30. Stoten DP, Gómez EG. Adaptive control of shaking tables using the minimal control synthesis algorithm. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2001; 359:1697-1723.
31. Popov VM. Hyperstability of Automatic Control Systems. Springer: Berlin, 1973.
32. Landau ID. Adaptive Control-The Model Reference Approach. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1979.
33. Wen YK. Method of random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 1976; 102:249-263.
34. Coleman TF, Li Y. On the convergence of reflective newton methods for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Mathematical Programming 1994; 67(2):189-224.
35. Coleman TF, Li Y. An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM Journal on Optimization 1996; 6:418-445.