Time-resolved PIV technique for high temporal resolution measurement of mechanical prosthetic aortic valve fluid dynamics

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 153-162

  Kaminsky, R ^a,b   Morbiducci, Umberto ^c   Rossi, M ^c   Scalise, L ^c   Verdonck, P ^a   Grigioni, M ^d  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b ILA GmbH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^d ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biofluid dynamics; Flow visualization; Particle image velocimetry; Prosthetic heart valves

Indexed keywords

FLOW FIELDS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESES; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; VALVES (MECHANICAL); VELOCIMETERS; VELOCITY;

BILEAFLET; BIOFLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW VISUALISATION; FLUID-DYNAMICS; HIGH TEMPORAL RESOLUTION MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY TECHNIQUE; PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; TIME-RESOLVED PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; VALVES (FLUIDS);

VELOCITY MEASUREMENT;

AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART CYCLE; HEMODYNAMICS; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; SCINTILLATION CAMERA; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 34147095518     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880703000210     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Nygaard H, Giersiepen M, Hasenkam JM, Westphal D, Paulsen PK, Reul H. Estimation of turbulent shear stresses in pulsatile flow immediately downstream of two artificial aortic valves in vitro. J Biomech 1990; 23: 1231-8.
2. Sallam AM, Hwang NH. Human red blood cell hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow: contribution of Reynolds shear stresses. Biorheology 1984; 21: 783-97.
3. Fontaine AA, Ellis JT, Healy TM, Hopmeyer J, Yoganathan AP. Identification of peak stresses in cardiac prostheses. A comparison of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional principal stress analysis. ASAIO J 1996; 42: 154-63.
4. Yoganathan AP, Corcoran WH, Harrison EC, Carl JR. The Bjork-Shiley aortic prosthesis: flow characteristics, thrombus formation and tissue overgrowth. Circulation 1978; 58: 70-6.
5. Giersiepen M, Wurzinger LJ, Opitz R, Reul H. Estimation of shear stress related blood damage in heart valve prostheses: in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. Int J Artif Organs 1990; 13: 300-6.
6. Lim WL, Chew YT, Chew TC, Low HT. Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1417-27.
7. Grigioni M, Daniele C, D'Avenio G, Barbaro V. A discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis related to Reynolds shear stress. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1107-12.
8. Bottio T, Casarotto D, Thiene G, Caprili L, Angelini A, Gerosa G. Leaflet escape in a new bileaflet mechanical valve: TRI technologies. Circulation 2003; 107: 2303-6.
9. Barbaro V, Grigioni M, Daniele C, D'Avenio G, Boccanera G. 19 mm sized bileaflet valve prostheses' flow field investigated by bidimensional laser Doppler anemometry (part I: velocity profiles). Int J Artif Organs 1997; 20: 622-8.
10. Baldwin JT, Deutsch S, Petrie, HL, Tarbell JM. Determination of principal Reynolds stresses in pulsatile flows after elliptical filtering of discrete velocity measurements. J Biomech Eng 1993; 115: 396-403.
11. Grigioni M, Daniele C, D'Avenio G, Barbaro V. Laser Doppler anemometry study of bidimensional flows downstream of three 19-mm bileaflet valves in the mitral position, under kinematic similarity. Ann Biomed Eng 2000; 28: 194-203.
12. Hanle DD, Harrison EC, Yoganathan AP, Corcoran WH. In vitro velocity measurements down stream from the Ionescu-Shiley aortic bioprosthesis in steady and pulsatile flow. Med Biol Eng Comput 1986; 24: 449-59.
13. Sung HW, Cape EG, Yoganathan AP. In vitro fluid dynamic evaluation of the Carbomedics bileaflet heart valve prosthesis in the aortic and mitral positions. J Heart Valve Dis 1994; 3: 673-83.
14. Ellis JT, Healy TM, Fontaine AA, Weston MW, Jarret CA, Saxena R, Yoganathan AP. An in vitro investigation of the retrograde flow fields of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5: 600-6.
15. Adrian RJ. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1991; 23: 261-304.
16. Grigioni M, Daniele C, D'Avenio G, Morbiducci U, Del Gaudio C, Abbate M, Di Meo D. Innovative technologies for the assessment of cardiovascular medical devices: state of the art techniques for artificial heart valves testing. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004; 1: 89-101.
17. Prasad AK, Adrian RJ, Landreth CC, Offutt PW. Effect of resolution on the speed and accuracy of particle image velocimetry interrogation. Exp Fluids 1992; 13: 105-16.
18. Marassi M, Castellini P, Pinotti M, Scalise L. Cardiac valve prosthesis flow performances measured by 2D and 3D-stereo particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 2004; 36: 176-86.
19. Kaminsky R, Rossi M, Morbiducci U, Scalise L, Castellini P, Kallweit S, Verdonck P, Grigioni M. 3D PIV measurement of prosthetic heart valves fluid dynamics. ESAO 2005, XXXIIth Annual Congress of the European Society for Artificial Organs, October 5-8, 2005 Bologna, Italy. Int J Artif Organs 2005 (abstract).
20. Rossi M, Morbiducci U, Scalise L. Laser based measurement techniques applied to the study of prosthetic mechanical heart valves fluid dynamics. ESAO 2005, XXXIIth Annual Congress European Society for Artificial Organs, October 5-8, 2005 Bologna, Italy. Int J Artif Organs 2005 (abstract).
21. Westerhof N, Elzinga G. Pressure and flow generated by the left ventricule against different impedances. Circ Res 1973; 32: 178-86.
22. Jeremy D, Schaub JD, Koenig SC, Schroeder MJ, Ewert DL, Drew GA, Swope RD. Development of a flow feedback pulse duplicator system with rhesus monkey arterial input impedance characteristics. ASAIO J 1999; 45: 334-9.
23. Temple LJ, Serafin R, Calvert NG, Drabble JM. Principle of fluid mechanics applied to some situations in the human circulation and particularly to testing of valves in a pulse duplicator. Thorax 1964; 19: 261-7.
24. Raffel M, Willert CE, Kompenhans J. Particle Image Velocimetry: a practical guide. Berlin: Springer; 1998.
25. Wernet M. Symmetric phase only filtering: a new paradigm for DPIV data processing. Meas Sci Technol 2005; 16: 601-18.
26. Meijering E. A Chronology of Interpolation: From Ancient Astronomy to Modern Signal and Image Processing. Proceedings of IEEE, 2002; 90: 319-42.
27. Scarano F. Iterative image deformation methods in PIV, Meas Sci Technol 2002; 13: R1-R19.
28. Scarano F. On the stability of iterative PIV image interrogation methods. In: 12th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal 2004.
29. Lecordier B, Trinité M. Advanced PIV algorithms with Image Distortion Validation and Comparison using Synthetic Images of Turbulent Flow, Proceedings of the Euro PIV 2 Workshop 2003.
30. Thévenaz P, Blu T, Unser M. Image interpolation and resampling. In: Bankman IN, ed. Handbook of medical imaging, processing & analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000. p 393-420.
31. Kaminsky R, Kallweit S, Simons AP, Weber HJ. PIV Measurements with high Temporal Resolution behind Artificial Heart Valves. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, Sept 21-23 2005, Pasadena, California.
32. Browne P, Ramuzat A, Saxena R, Yoganathan AP. Experimental investigation of the steady flow downstream of the St. Jude bileaflet heart valve: a comparison between laser Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry techniques. Ann Biomed Eng 2000; 28: 39-47.
33. Brucker C, Steinseifer U, Schroder W, Reul H. Unsteady flow through a new mechanical heart valve prosthesis analysed by digital particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 2002; 13: 1043-9.
34. Subramanian A, Mu H, Kadambi JR, Wernet MP, Brendzel AM, Harasaki H. Particle image velocimetry investigation of intravalvular flow fields of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve in a pulsatile flow. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 721-31.
35. Manning KB, Kini V, Fontaine AA, Deutsch S, Tarbell JM. Regurgitant flow field characteristics of the St. Jude bileaflet mechanical heart valve under physiologic pulsatile flow using particle image velocimetry. Artif Organs 2003; 27: 840-6.
36. Kini V, Bachmann C, Fontaine AA, Deutsch S, Tarbell JM. Integrating particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler velocimetry measurements of the regurgitant flow field past mechanical heart valves. Artif Organs 2001; 25: 136-45.
37. Pierrakos O, Vlachos PP, Telionis DP Time-resolved DPIV analysis of vortex dynamics in a left ventricular model through bileaflet mechanical and porcine heart valve prostheses. J Biomech Eng 2004; 126: 714-26.
38. Akutsu T, Fukuda T. Time-resolved particle image velocimetry and laser doppler anemometry study of the turbulent flow field of bileaflet mechanical mitral prostheses. J Artif Organs 2005; 8: 171-83.
39. Cromheecke ME, Overkamp PJ, de Mol BA, van Gaalen G, Becker A. Retrieval analysis of mechanical heart valves: impact on design and clinical practice. Int J Artif Organs 1998; 22: 794-9.
40. Yoghanatan AP, Chandran KB, Sotiropoulos F. Flow in Prosthetic Heart Valves: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions. Ann Biomed Eng 2005: 33: 1689-94.
41. Redaelli A, Bothorel H, Votta E, Soncini M, Morbiducci U, Del Caudio C, Balducci A, Grigioni M. 3-D simulation of the SJM bileaflet valve opening process: fluid-structure interaction study and experimental validation. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 804-13.
42. Dumont K, Vierendeels JA, Segers P, Van Nooten GJ, Verdonck PR. Predicting ATS Open Pivot heart valve performance with computational fluid dynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14: 393-9.
43. Grigioni M, Daniele C, Del Gaudio C, Morbiducci U, Balducci A, D'Avenio G, Barbaro V. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of flow through an aortic bileaflet valve in a realistic model of aortic root. ASAIO J 2005; 51: 176-83.
44. Ge L, Jones SC, Sotiropoulos F, Healy TM, Yoganathan AP. Numerical simulation of flow in mechanical heart valves: grid resolution and the assumption of flow symmetry. J Biomech Eng 2003; 125: 709-18.
45. Liu JS, Lu PC, Chu SH. Turbulence characteristics downstream of bileaflet aortic valve prostheses. J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 118-24.
46. Nichils WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's blood flow in arteries, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990.
47. Bellhouse BJ, Bellhouse FH, Reid KG. Fluid mechanics of the aortic root with application to coronary flow. Nature 1968; 219: 1059-61.
48. Ohta Y, Kikuta Y, Shimooka T, Mitamura Y, Yuhta T, Dohi T. Effect of the sinus of valsalva on the closing motion of bileaflet prosthetic heart valves. Artif Organs 2000; 24: 309-12.
49. Grigioni M, Morbiducci U, D'Avenio G, Di Meo D, Del Gaudio C. Laser techniques to study prosthetic heart valves fluid dynamics. In: Recent Research Developments in Biomechanics. Trivandrum: Transworld Research Network; 2005. p 79-106.
50. Kleine P, Perthel M, Nygaard H, Hansen SB, Paulsen PK, Riis C, Laas J. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 548-55.
51. Leo HL, Dasi LP, Carberry J, Simon HA, Yoganathan AP. Fluid dynamic assessment of three polymeric heart valves using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 936-52.
52. Morbiducci U, D'Avenio G, Del Gaudio C, Crigioni M. Testing requirements for steroscopic Particle Image Velocimetry measurements of mechanical heart valves fluid dynamics. Proceedings on III Workshop BioFluMen; 2004 Nov 15; Rome, Italy. Rome: Istituto Superiore di Sanità, p. 21-27.