Defining information need in health - assimilating complex theories derived from information science

Health Expectations

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 92-104

  Ormandy, Paula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication theory; Information need; Patient education

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MENTAL STRESS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLICY; SELF EFFICACY; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 79951732483     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00598.x     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
2. Coulter A, Jenkinson C. European patients' views on responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. The European Journal of Public Health, 2003; 15: 355-360.
3. Watkiss D. Information for Patients: The EU's Policy Options. Background Report Friends of Europe, 2006. Available at:, accessed 8 December 2008.
4. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2008.
5. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.
6. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health, 2001.
7. Department of Health. Getting the Right Start: National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services: Standard for Hospital Services. London: Department of Health, 2003.
8. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Renal Services - Part One: Dialysis and Transplantation. London: Department of Health, 2004.
9. Department of Health. National Standards Local Action - Health and Social Care Standards and Planning Framework 2005/06-2007/08. London: Department of Health, 2007.
10. Department of Health. Creating a Patient-Led NHS-Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. London: Department of Health, 2005.
11. Coulter A, Magee H. The European Patient of the Future. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003.
12. World Health Organisation. People at the Centre of Health Care: Harmonising Mind and Body, People and Systems. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2007. Available at:, accessed 8 December 2008.
13. Beaver K. Meeting the information needs of people with cancer. [Editorial]. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2004; 8: 193-194. [Erratum European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2005; 9 (1):108K. Beaver not K. Beever].
14. Consumers' Association. Patient Information: What's the Prognosis? Policy Report. London: Consumers' Association, 2003.
15. Shenton AK, Dixon P. The nature of information needs and strategies for their investigation in youngsters. Library & Information Science Research, 2004; 26: 296-310.
16. Wilson TD. On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 1981; 37: 3-15.
17. Dervin B. From the mind's eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative and quantitative methodology. In: Glazier JD, Powell RR (eds) Qualitative Research in Information Management. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1992: 61-84.
18. Savolainen R. Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of "Way of Life". Library & Information Science Research, 1995; 17: 259-294.
19. Harland JA, Bath PA. Understanding the information behaviours of carers of people with dementia: a critical review of models from information science. Aging & Mental Health, 2008; 12: 467-477.
20. Losee RM. A discipline independent definition of Information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997; 48: 254-269.
21. Case DO. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier Science, 2002.
22. Hayes RM. Measurement of Information. Information Processing and Management, 1993; 29: 1-11.
23. Bates MJ. Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 2005; 10: paper 239 Available at:, accessed 23 January 2008.
24. Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C. The Theory & Practice of Learning, 2nd edn. London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2003.
25. Belkin NJ. Anomalous state of knowledge. In: Fisher KE, Elderez S, McKechnie LEF (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. American Society of Information Science and Technology Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc, 2005: 44-49.
26. Krikelas J. Information-seeking behaviour: patterns and concepts. Drexel Library Quarterly, 1983; 19: 5-20.
27. Kuhlthau CC. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991; 42: 361-371.
28. Nahl D. Social-biological information technology: an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005; 58: 2021-2046.
29. Scott JT, Thompson DR. Assessing the patient information needs of post-myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003; 50: 167-177.
30. Timmins F. Exploring the concept of 'information need'. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 2006; 12: 375-381.
31. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decision with patients: is the information good enough? British Medical Journal, 1999; 318: 318-322.
32. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C et al. Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in-depth interview study. (Statistical Data Included). British Medical Journal, 2000; 320: 909-913.
33. Dixon-Woods M. Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. Social Science & Medicine, 2001; 52: 1417-1432.
34. Hyland ME, Jones RCM, Hanney KE. The Lung Information Needs Questionnaire: development, preliminary validation and findings. Respiratory Medicine, 2006; 100: 1807-1816.
35. Knowles MS. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, 3rd edn. Houston, TX: Gulf, 1989.
36. Orem DE. Nursing: Concepts of Practice, 6th edn. London: Mosby, 2001.
37. Simpson J, Weiner E. (eds) Information. In: Oxford English Dictionary Online, 1989. Available at:, accessed 11 November 2007.
38. Dervin B, Nilan M. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1986; 21: 3-33.
39. Derr RL. A conceptual analysis of information need. Information Processing and Management, 1983; 19: 273-278.
40. Wilson TD. Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 1999; 55: 249-270.
41. Wildemuth BM, Hughes A. Perspectives on the tasks in which information behaviors are embedded. In: Fisher KE, Elderez S, McKechnie LEF (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. American Society of Information Science and Technology Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc, 2005: 275-279.
42. Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Health information-seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, 2007; 17: 1006-1019.
43. Ingwersen P, Järvelin K. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. The Netherlands: Springer, 2005.
44. Dervin B. Given a context by any other name: methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. In Vakkari P, Savolainen R, Dervin B (eds) Information Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts 14-16 August 1996. Tampere, Finland. London: Taylor Graham, 1997: 13-38.
45. Dervin B. On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management, 1999; 35: 727-750.
46. Allen BL. Information Tasks: Towards A User-Centred Approach to Information Systems. San Diego CA: Academic Press, 1996.
47. Watters C, Duffy J. Motivational factors for interface design. In: Fisher KE, Elderez S, McKechnie LEF (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. American Society of Information Science and Technology Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., 2005: 242-246.
48. Wilson TD. 60 Years of the best in information research: on user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 2006; 62: 658-670.
49. van der Molen B. Relating information needs to the cancer experience: information as the key coping strategy. European Journal of Cancer Care, 1999; 8: 238-244.
50. Rees CE, Bath PA. Information-seeking behaviours of women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2001; 28: 899-907.
51. Timmins F. A review of the information needs of patients with acute coronary syndromes. British Association of Critical Care Nurses, Nursing in Critical Care, 2005; 10: 174-183.
52. Astin F, José Closs S, McLenachan J, Hunter S, Priestley C. The information needs of patients treated with primary angioplasty for heart attack: An exploratory study. Patient Education and Counselling, 2008; 73: 325-332.
53. Luker KA, Beaver K, Leinster SJ, Owens RG, Degner LF, Sloan JA. The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1995; 22: 134-141.
54. Browall M, Carlsson M, Horvath G. Information needs of women with recently diagnosed ovarian cancer - a longitudinal study. European Oncology Nursing Society, 2004; 8: 200-207.
55. Rutten LJF, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Education and Counseling, 2005; 57: 250-261.
56. Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 2007; 65: 342-350.
57. Parker SM, Clayton JM, Hancock K et al. A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style and timing of information. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2007; 34: 81-93.
58. Johnson JD. On context of information seeking. Information Processing and Management, 2003; 39: 735-760.
59. Wilkgren M. Critical realism as a philosophy and social theory in information science? Journal of Documentation, 2004; 61: 11-22.
60. Larson CO, Nelson EC, Gustafson D, Batalden PB. The relationship between meeting patients' information needs and their satisfaction with hospital care and general health status outcomes. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996; 8: 447-456.
61. Ankem K. Factors influencing information needs among cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 2006; 28: 7-23.
62. Zhang P, Benjamin RI. Understanding information related fields: a conceptual framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007; 58: 1934-1947.
63. Wilson TD, Walsh C. Information Behaviour: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. British Library and Innovation Board Report 10. London: British Library Board, 1996. Available at:, accessed 19 February 2008.
64. Neidźweidzka B. A proposed general model of information behaviour. Information Research, 2003; 9: paper 164. Available at:, accessed 6 February 2008.
65. Solomon P. Discovering information behavior in sense making. III. The Person. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997; 48: 1127-1138.
66. Hepworth M. A framework for understanding user requirements for an information service: defining the needs of informal carers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004; 55: 695-708.
67. Niccum KJ, Perez D. Wheels within wheels: creating a circle of knowledge through communication. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy, 2000; 7: S56-S64.
68. Hienström J. Five personality dimensions and their influences on information behaviour. Information Research, 2003; 9: paper 165. Available at:, accessed 24 October 2007.
69. Wilson TD, Ford N, Ellis D, Foster A, Spink A. Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 2. Uncertainty and its correlates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002; 53: 704-715.
70. Youngkill L, McCormick BP. Sense making process in defining health for people with chronic illnesses and disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, Third Quarter, 2002. Available at:, accessed 13 December 2007.
71. Folkman S, Lazerus RS. An analysis of coping in middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1980; 21: 219-239.
72. Folkman S, Lazerus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, Delongis A, Gruen RJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986; 50: 992-1003.
73. Leake R, Friend R, Wadhwa N. Improving adjustment to chronic illness through strategic self-presentation: an experimental study on a renal dialysis unit. Health Psychology, 1999; 18: 54-62.
74. Christensen AJ, Ehlers SL. Psychological factors in end-stage renal disease: an emerging context of behavioral medicine research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2002; 70: 712-724.
75. Savolainen R. The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centred approach of information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 1993; 29: 13-28.
76. Godbold N. Beyond information seeking: towards a general model of information behaviour. Information Research, 2006; 11: paper 269. Available at:, accessed 31 October 2007.
77. Case DO, Andrews JE, Johnson JD, Allard SL. Avoiding versus seeking: the relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2005; 93: 353-362.
78. Longo DR. Understanding health information, communication and information seeking of patients and consumers: a comprehensive and integrated model. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 189-194.
79. Ormandy P. Chronic Kidney Disease: Patient Information Need, Preferences and Priorities. Published Doctoral Thesis, Manchester: University of Salford, 2008.
80. Johnson JD, Andrews JE, Allard S. A model for understanding and affecting cancer genetics information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 2001; 23: 335-349.
81. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS (ed) Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1994: 71-81. (Reprinted in Friedman H (ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
82. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002; 53: 109-132.
83. Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 1996; 11: 11-18.
84. Goldring AB, Taylor SE, Kemeny ME, Anton PA. Impact of health beliefs, quality of life, and the physician-patient relationship on the treatment of intentions of inflammatory bowel disease patients. Health Psychology, 2002; 21: 219-228.
85. Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Lawton WJ. Health locus of control and depression in chronic kidney disease: a dynamic perspective. Journal of Health Psychology, 2005; 10: 677-686.
86. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1997; 277: 1485-1492.
87. Talja S. Constituting "information" and "user" as research objects: A theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory. In: Vakkari P, Savolainen R, Dervin B (eds) Information Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts 14-16 August 1996. Tampere, Finland/London: Taylor Graham, 1997: 67-80.
88. Chatman E. Life in a small world: applicability of Gratification Theory to information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991; 42: 438-449.
89. Pettigrew KE. Waiting for chiropody: contextual results from an ethnographic study of information behaviour among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing and Management, 1999; 35: 801-817.
90. McCreadie M, Rice RE. Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing and Management, 1999; 35: 45-76.
91. Savolainen R. Spatial factors as contextual qualifiers of information seeking. Information Research, 2006; 11: paper 261. Available at:, accessed 23 October 2007.
92. Attfield SJ, Adams A, Blandford A. Patient information needs: pre and post consultation. Health Informatics Journal, 2006; 12: 167-177.
93. Julien H, Michels D. Intra-individual information behaviour in daily life. Information Processing and Management, 2004; 40: 547-562.
94. Dervin B. Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of the user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1998; 2: 36-45.
95. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences amongst cancer patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1980; 92: 832-836.
96. Harrison DE, Galloway S, Graydon JE, Palmer-Wickham S, Rich-van der Bij L. Information needs and preference for information of women with breast cancer over a first course of radiation therapy. Patient Education and Counseling, 1999; 38: 217-225.
97. Mesters I, van den Borne B, De Boer M, Pruyn J. Measuring information needs among cancer patients. Patient Education and Counselling, 2001; 43: 253-262.
98. Kumar DM, Symonds RP, Sundar S, Ibrahim K, Savelyich BSP, Miller E. Information needs of Asian and White British cancer patients and their families in Leicestershire: a cross-sectional survey. British Journal of Cancer, 2004; 90: 1471-1478.
99. McCaughan E, McKenna H. Never-ending making sense: towards a substantive theory of information seeking behaviour of newly diagnosed cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2006; 16: 2096-2104.
100. Beaver K, Booth K. Information needs and decision-making preferences: comparing findings for gynaecological, breast and colorectal cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2007; 11: 409-416.
101. Caress A-L, Luker K, Woodcock A, Beaver K. An exploratory study of priority information needs in adult asthma patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 2002; 47: 319-327.
102. Orsino A, Cameron JI, Seidl M, Mendelssohn D, Stewart DE. Medical decision-making and information needs in end-stage renal disease patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2003; 25: 324-331.
103. Hepworth M, Harrision J. A survey of the information needs of people with multiple sclerosis. Health Informatics Journal, 2004; 10: 49-69.
104. Burkell JA, Wolfe DL, Potter PJ, Jutai JW. Information needs and information sources of individuals living with spinal cord injury. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 2006; 23: 257-265.
105. Avery JC, Braunack-Mayer AJ. The information needs of women diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome - implications for treatment and health outcomes. Bio Medical Central (BMC) Womens Health, 2007; 7:9. Open access doi:. Available at:, accessed 10 April 2008.
106. Fine A, Fontaine B, Kraushar MM, Plamondon J. Patients with chronic kidney disease Stages 3 and 4 demand survival information on dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 2007; 27: 589-591.
107. Savolainen R. Time as a context of information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 2006; 28: 110-127.
108. Nicholas D. Assessing Information Needs: Tools, Techniques and Concepts for the Internet Age, 2nd edn. The Association for Information Management and Information Management International. London: Staple Hall, 2000.
109. Ford N. Modeling cognitive processes in information seeking: From Popper to Pask. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2004; 55: 769-782.
110. Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in Information Science. Part II: nature and manifestations of Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007; 58: 1915-1933.
111. McIver S. Consumer health information services cannot work alone. Quality in Health Care, 1998; 7: 121.