Understanding information related fields: A conceptual framework

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1934-1947

  Zhang, Ping ^a   Benjamin, Robert I ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; INFORMATION-MODEL; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS;

CURRICULA; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 36849007496     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20660     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Allen, R. (2000). The Penguin English Dictionary: Penguin Books.
3. Banville. C. & Landry, M. (1989). Can the field of MIS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 48-60.
4. Baskerville, R.L., & Myers, M.D. (2002). Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 1-14.
5. Bates, M.J. ( 1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185-1205.
6. Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
7. Benbasat, I., & Weber, R. (1996). Rethinking "diversity" in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-399.
8. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
9. Benjamin, R. (1971). Benjamin, control of the information systems development cycle. New York: Wiley.
10. Benjamin, R., & Eriksson, I. (2001). Dilemmas for managers: Unintended consequences of information and communications technologies. In G. Dickson & G. DeSanctis (Eds.), Information technology and the future enterprise: Prentice Hall.
11. Benjamin, R.I., & Levinson, E. (1993). A sramework for managing ITenabled change. Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 23-33.
12. Blackman, B., Bublotz, D., Foster, C., Schmidt, J., Bates, M., Sutton, S., et al. (1995). Future directions for the library profession and its education: CLA task force on the Future of Librarianship.
13. Borko. H. (1968). Information science: What is it? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 19, 3-5.
14. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Don't count society out. In P. Denning (Ed.), The invisible future: The seamless integration of technology into everyday life (pp. 117-144). New York: McGraw Hill.
15. Carroll, J.M., Dourish, P., Friedman, B., Kurosu, M., Olson, G., & Sutcliffe, A. (2006, April 22-27). Institutionalizing HCI: What do I-schooIs offer? Paper presented at the ACM CHI Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
16. Chandler, A. (1977). The ACM visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business: Harvard University Press.
17. Crystal, D. (2001). The Crystal Reference Encyclopedia: Quotations Ltd.
18. Davis, G. (1974). Management information systems: conceptual foundations, structure, and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Dervin, B. (1997). Given a context by any other name: Methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, &
20. B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context, Proceedings of an international conference on research information needs, seeking and use in different contexts (pp. 13-38). Tampere, Finland: Taylor Graham.
21. Dickson, G., & DeSanctis, G. (2001). Information technology and the future enterprise: Prentice Hall.
22. Ellis, D., Allen, D., & Wilson, T. (1999). Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1095-1107.
23. Floridi, L. (2005). Semantic conceptions of information, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-semantic/
24. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
25. Galletta, D., & Zhang, P. (Eds.). (2006). Human-computer interaction and management information systems-applications (Vol. 5). Armonk, NY; M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
26. Grudin, J. (2005). Three faces of human-computer interaction. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 27(4), 46-62.
27. Grudin, J. (2006a). Human factors, CHI and MIS. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (Vol. 1, pp. 402-421). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
28. Grudin, J. (2006b). Is HCI homeless? In search of inter-disciplinary status. Interactions: New Visions of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 54-59.
29. Hewett, T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., et al. (1992). ACM SIHCHI curricula for human-computer interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
30. Hjorland, B. (2000). Library and information science: practice, theory and philosophical basis. Information Processing and Management, 36, 501-531.
31. Hjorland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.
32. Joy, W. (2000). Why the future doesn't need us. Issue 8.08, April Wired Magazine http://www.wired.eom/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html. Last accessed June 28, 2007.
33. Keen, P.G.W. (1980). MIS research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. Paper presented at the The First International Conference on Information Systems.
34. Kegan, R., & Lahey, L.L. (2000). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation: Jossey-Bass.
35. Larson, R. (2004, October 19-22). Reinforcing the "I" in IT education. Paper presented at the Educause.
36. Larson, R. (2005). I-school for the 21st century: An introduction to the School of Information Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh.
37. Leavitt, H.J., & Whisler, T.L. (1958). Management in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 41-48.
38. Linstone, H.A. (1985). Multiple perspectives: Overcoming the weaknesses of MS/OR. Interfaces, 15(4), 77-85.
39. Liu, X., Benjamin, R., & Zhang, P. (2007). Examining IT enabled change cases with a model of the information field: The Tiger Creek Case. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE.
40. Markus, L.M. (2003). Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 1-19.
41. Markus, M.L., & Benjamin, R. (1997). The magic bullet theory in IT-enabled transformation. Sloan Management Review, 55-68.
42. Nardi, B.A., & O'Day, V.L. (1999). Information ecologies: using technology with heart: The MIT Press.
43. Osterlund, C.S. (2000). The power of whiteboards: Boundary objects and the politics of coordination and knowledge sharing. Paper presented at the OCIS/OMT Symposium, The Academy of Management, Toronto.
44. Pfaffenberger, B. (2003). Webster's New World™ Computer Dictionary (Vol. Wiley Publishing, Inc.). Indianapolis, Indiana.
45. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46. Rubin, R.E. (2000). Foundations of library and information science. New York: Neal-Schuman.
47. Schein, E.H. (1993). How can organizations learn faster: The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Management Review, 88-89.
48. Schein, E.H. (1996). Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systemic Practice and Action Research 9(1).
49. Scott Morton, M.S. (Ed.). (1991). The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 & 623-656.
51. Stanton, J.M., & Stam, K. R. (2006). The visible employee. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
52. Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematics of communication. Scientific American, 181(1), 11-15.
53. Weiner, N. (1961). Cybernetics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon press.
55. Wood-Harper, T., & Wood, B. (2005). Multiview as social informatics in action: past, present and future. Information Technology & People, 18(1), 26-32.
56. Zhang, P., Benbasat, I., Carey, J., Davis, F., Galletta, D., & Strong, D. (2002). Human-computer interaction research in the mis discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 9(20), 334-355.
57. Zhang, P., & Dillon, A. (2003). HCI and MIS: Shared concerns. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 397-402.
58. Zhang, P., & Galletta, D. (Eds.). (2006). Human-computer interaction and management information systems-Foundations (Vol. 4). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
59. Zhang, P., & Li, N. (2005). The intellectual development of Human-Computer Interaction research: A critical assessment of the MIS literature (1990-2002). Journal of Association for Information Systems, 6(11), 227-292.
60. Zhang, P., Li, N., & Sun, H. (2006, January 4-7). Affective quality and cognitive absorption: Extending technology acceptance research. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, Hawaii, IEEE.
61. Zhang, P., Nah, F.-H. F., & Preece, J. (2004). HCI studies in MIS. Behaviour & information technology, 23(3), 147-151.
62. Zuboff, S. (1989). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
63. Zuboff, S., & Bronsema, G. (1984). Expense tracking system at Tiger Creek. Harvard Business School Cases.