Factors influencing success among collaborative sage-grouse management groups in the western United States

Environmental Conservation

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 250-260

  Belton, Lorien R ^a   Jackson Smith, Douglas ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

collaborative conservation; collaborative natural resource management; facilitation; implementation success; local working group; psychological ownership; sage grouse; wildlife management

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE CONSERVATION; COLLABORATIVE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FACILITATION; IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS; LOCAL WORKING GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP; SAGE-GROUSE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SURVEYS;

NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FACILITATION; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NATURAL RESOURCE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; POPULATION DECLINE; POULTRY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

CENTROCERCUS UROPHASIANUS;

EID: 79951728220     PISSN: 03768929     EISSN: 14694387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000615     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Belton, L.R., Jackson-Smith, D. & Messmer, T.A. (2009) Assessing the needs of sage-grouse local working groups: final technical report. Report. Institute for Social Science Research on Natural Resources, Utah State University. Logan, Utah, USA.
2. Bentrup, G. (2001) Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27: 739-748. (Pubitemid 32332566)
3. Bidwell, R.D. & Ryan, C.M. (2006) Collaborative partnership design: the implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 19: 827-843. (Pubitemid 44264040)
4. Bryan, T.A. (2004) Tragedy averted: the promise of collaboration. Society and Natural Resources 17: 881-896. (Pubitemid 39500387)
5. Clark, B.T., Burkardt, N. & King, M.D. (2005) Watershed management and organizational dynamics: nationwide findings and regional variation. Environmental Management 36: 297-310. (Pubitemid 41204394)
6. Conley, A. & Moote, M.A. (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371-386. (Pubitemid 36689631)
7. Dakins, M.E., Long, J.D. & Hart, M. (2005) Collaborative environmental decision making in Oregon watershed groups: perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41: 171-180. (Pubitemid 40526630)
8. Daniels, S.E. & Cheng, A.S. (2004) Collaborative resource management: discourse-based approaches and the evolution of technoreg. In: Society and Natural Resources: A Summary of Knowledge, ed. M.J. Manfredo, J.J. Vaske, B.L. Bruyere, D.R. Field & P.J. Brown, pp. 125-136. Jefferson, MO, USA: Modern Litho.
9. Dillman, D.A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Second edition. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10. Genskow, K.D. (2001) Critical factors for watershed partnerships: an analysis of actions and accomplishments. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA: 301 pp.
11. Hershdorfer, M.E., Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E. & Howery, L.D. (2007) Key attributes influence the performance of local weed management programs in the southwest United States. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60: 225-234. (Pubitemid 46853841)
12. Imperial, M.T. (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 24: 449-465. (Pubitemid 29474821)
13. Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65: 412-423. (Pubitemid 30001320)
14. Kenney, D.S. (2000) Arguing About Consensus. Boulder, Colorado, USA: Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado Law School.
15. Koontz, T.M. (2005) We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal 33: 459-481. (Pubitemid 41175086)
16. Koontz, T.M. & Thomas, C.W. (2006) What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66: 111-121. (Pubitemid 44721180)
17. Lachapelle, P.R. & McCool, S.F. (2005) Exploring the concept of 'ownership' in natural resource planning. Society and Natural Resources 18: 279-285. (Pubitemid 40473514)
18. Lachapelle, P.R., McCool, S.F. & Patterson, M.E. (2003) barriers to effective natural resource planning in a 'messy' world. Society and Natural Resources 16: 473-490. (Pubitemid 36922691)
19. Leach, W.D. (2006) Collaborative public management and democracy: evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review 66: 100-110. (Pubitemid 44721179)
20. Leach, W.D. & Pelkey, N.W. (2001) Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127: 378-385. (Pubitemid 33066770)
21. Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W. & Sabatier, P.A. (2002) Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21: 645-670. (Pubitemid 37239530)
22. Margerum, R.D. (1999) Getting past yes: from capital creation to action. Journal of the American Planning Association 65: 181-192. (Pubitemid 29328683)
23. Margerum, R.D. (2007) Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Society and Natural Resources 20: 135-152. (Pubitemid 46978609)
24. Mayhew, M.G., Ashkanasy, N.M., Bramble, T. & Gardner, J. (2007) A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. Journal of Social Psychology 147: 477-500.
25. Norusis, M.J. (1990) SPSS Advanced Statistics Student Guide. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc.
26. Pagdee, A., Kim, Y.-S. & Daugherty, P.F. (2006) What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19: 33-52. (Pubitemid 43084535)
27. Perry, R.I. & Ommer, R.E. (2003) Scale issues in marine ecosystems and human interactions. Fisheries Oceanography 12: 513-522. (Pubitemid 37274154)
28. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K.T. (2003) The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 7: 84-107. (Pubitemid 37170606)
29. Schroeder, M.A., Aldridge, C.L., Apa, A.D., Bohne, J.R., Braun, C.E., Bunnell, S.D., Connelly, J.W., Deibert, P.A, Gardner, S.C., Hilliard, M.A., Kobriger, G.D., McAdam, S.M, McCarthy, C.W., McCarthy, J.J., Mitchell, D.L., Rickerson, E.V. & Stiver, S.J. (2004) Distribution of sage-grouse in North America. Condor 106: 363-376. (Pubitemid 38587844)
30. Selin, S.W. & Chavez, D. (1995) Developing a collaborative model for environmental-planning and management. Environmental Management 19: 189-195.
31. Selin, S.W., Schuett, M.A. & Carr, D. (2000) Modeling stakeholder perceptions of collaborative initiative effectiveness. Society and Natural Resources 13: 735-745. (Pubitemid 32013363)
32. Stiver, S.J., Apa, A.D., Bohne, J.R., Bunnell, S.D., Deibert, P.A., Gardner, S.C., M.A. Hilliard, M.A., McCarthy, C.W. & Schroeder, M.A. (2006) Greater sage-grouse comprehensive conservation strategy. Report, Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Cheyenne, WY, USA.
33. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
34. USGS (2008) Sage Grouse Local Working Group Locator, United States Geological Service [www document]. URL http://greatbasin.wr.usgs.gov/LWG/
35. United States Federal Register (2004) 90-day finding for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse as threatened or endangered. United States Federal Register 69: 21484-21494 (21 April 2004).
36. United States Federal Register (2010) 12-month findings for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered: notice of 12-month petition findings. United States Federal Register 75: 13909-14014 (23 March 2010).
37. Waage, S. (2003) Collaborative salmon recovery planning: examining decision making and implementation in northeastern Oregon. Society and Natural Resources 16: 295-307. (Pubitemid 36533555)
38. Weber, E.P. (2000) A new vanguard for the environment: grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society and Natural Resources 13: 237-259. (Pubitemid 30231935)
39. Weber, E.P. (2008) Reality and better mousetraps: a research agenda for new environmental governance institutions. Society and Natural Resources 21: 91-93. (Pubitemid 351298305)
40. WGA & NRCS (2004) Conserving the greater sage grouse: a compilation of efforts underway on state, tribal, provincial, and private lands. Report, Western Governors' Association and the Natural Resource Conservation Service, Denver, CO, USA.
41. Williams, E.M. & Ellefson, P.V. (1997) Going into partnership to manage a landscape. Journal of Forestry 95: 29-33.