Key attributes influence the performance of local weed management programs in the southwest United States

Rangeland Ecology and Management

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 225-234

  Hershdorfer, Mary E ^a   Fernandez Gimenez, Maria E ^b   Howery, Larry D ^c  

^a Plant Materials Center   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective action problem; Community based natural resource management; Invasive plants

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIVE ACTION; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; WEED CONTROL;

ARIZONA; COLORADO; NEW MEXICO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; UTAH;

EID: 34249814018     PISSN: 15507424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2111/1551-5028(2007)60[225:KAITPO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ACKERMAN, F. 1997. Why do we recycle? Markets, values and public policy. Washington, DC: Island Press. 210 p.
2. AGRAWAL, A. 2000. Common resources and institutional sustainability. In: E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber [EDS.]. The drama of the commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. p 41-85.
3. AGRAWAL, A., AND C. C. GIBSON. 2001. The role of community in natural resource conservation. In: A. Agrawal and C. C. Gibson [EDS.]. Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press. p 1-31.
4. AGRESTI, A., AND B. FINLAY. 1997. Statistical methods for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 706 p.
5. AMATYA, P. 2005. Problems of provision, externality and efficiency, and the case of coalition-based invasive weed management in the Southwest [dissertation]. Logan, UT: Utah State University. 112 p.
6. ANDERSON, G. L., E. S. DELFOSSE, N. R. SPENCER, C. W. PROSSER, AND R. D. RICHARD. 2003. Lessons in developing successful invasive weed control programs. Journal of Range Management 56:2-12.
7. BERNARD, R. 1995. Research methods in cultural anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York, NY: Altamira Press. 753 p.
8. BRANDON, A., G. SPYREAS, B. MOLANO- FLORES, C. CARROLL, AND J. ELLIS. 2003. Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Natural Areas Journal 23:254-261.
9. BROWN, W. T., M. E. KRASNY, AND N. SCHOCH. 2001. Volunteer monitoring of nonindigenous invasive plant species in the Adirondack Park, New York. Natural Areas Journal 21:189-196.
10. BRYMAN, A., and R. G. BURGESS [EDS.]. 1994. Analyzing qualitative data. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. 232 p.
11. CONLEY, A., AND A. MOOTE. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16:371-386.
12. CRAMER, G. C. 1995. Analysis and implementation of noxious weed policy on Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands in Arizona [dissertation]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 86 p.
13. DILLMAN, D. A. 2000. Mail and telephone surveys. 2nd ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley. 494 p.
14. DONNELLY, M. P., AND J. J. VASKE. 1996. Predicted attitudes towards a proposed moose hunt. Society and Natural Resources 8:301-319.
15. [FICMNEW] FEDERAL INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR MANAGEMENT OF NOXIOUS AND EXOTIC WEEDS. 1998. Pulling together: National strategy for invasive plant management. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. 22 p.
16. FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ, M. E., S. LEFEBRE, A. CONLEY, AND A. TENDICK. 2004. Collaborative stewardship of Arizona's rangelands: making a difference in resource management. Rangelands 26:24-30.
17. HERSHDORFER, M. E. 2004. Evaluating local invasive plant management programs in the southwest [thesis]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 179 p.
18. HINES, J. M., H. R. HUNGERFORD, AND A. N. TOMERA. 1987. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible behaviour: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education 18:1-8.
19. HODUR, N. M., F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND D. A. BANGSUND. 2006. Evaluation of TEAM leafy spurge project. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59(5):483-493.
20. HORTON, J. S. 1977. The development and perpetuation of the permanent tamarisk type in the phreatophyte zone of the southwest. In: R. Roy Johnson and Dale A. Jones [TECH. COORDS.]. Importance, preservation and management of riparian habitat: A symposium. Washington, DC: US Forest Service. Report GTR-RM 43. p 124-127.
21. INGRAM, H., AND A. SCHNEIDER. 1991. The choice of target populations. Administration and Society 23:333-356.
22. KOONTZ, T., T. STEELMAN, J. CARMIN, K. SMITH KORFMACHER, C. MOSELEY, AND C. THOMAS. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 210 p.
23. LEACH, W. D., N. W. PELKEY, AND P. A. SABATIER. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluative criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4):645-670.
24. LODGE, D. M., S. WILLIAMS, H. J. MACISAAC, K. R. YAHES, B. LEUNG, S. REICHARD, R. N. MACK, P. B. MOYLE, M. SMITH, D. A. ANDOW, J. T. CARLTON, AND A. MCM ICHAEL. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecological Applications 16(6):2035-2054.
25. MANZO, L. C., AND N. D. WEINSTEIN. 1987. Behavior commitment to environmental protection: a study of active and nonactive members of the Sierra Club. Environment and Behavior 19:673-694.
26. MASTERS, R. A., AND R. L. SHELEY. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. Journal of Range Management 54:502-517.
27. OLSON, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 176 p.
28. OSTROM, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 280 p.
29. OSTROM, E. 2000. The danger of self-evident truths. PS Online: 33-44.
30. PAGANO, M., AND K. GAUVREAU. 2000. Principles of biostatisics. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury. 525 p.
31. PERRINGS, C. M., M. WILLIAMSON, E. B. BARBIER, D. DELFINO, S. DALMAZZONE, J. SHOGREN, P. SIMMONS, AND A. WATKINSON. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conservation Ecology 6. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art1. Accessed 31 January 2005.
32. PORTER, M. E. 1991. America's green strategy. Scientific American 264(4):168.
33. PORTER, M. E., AND C. VAN DER LINDE. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4):97-118.
34. PUTNAM, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. 541 p.
35. SCHNEIDER, A., AND H. INGRAM. 1990. Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics 52:510-529.
36. SELIN, S., AND D. CHAVEZ. 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19:189-195.
37. SHELEY, R. L., and J. K. PETROFF [EDS.]. 1999. Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press. 438 p.
38. SHINE, C., N. WILLIAMS, AND F. BURHENNE- GUILMIN. 2005. Legal and institutional frameworks for invasive alien species. In: H. A. Mooney, R. N. Mack, J. A. McNeely, L. E. Neville, P. J. Shei, and J. K. Waage [EDS.]. Invasive alien species: A new synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. p 233-284.
39. SINGLETON, S. 1998. Constructing cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 165 p.
40. [SPSS] STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. 1999. SPSS Base 10.0 for Windows user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc. 548 p.
41. TANG, S. Y. 1994. Institutions and performance in irrigation systems. In: E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walker [EDS.]. Rules, games and common pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. p 225-246.
42. THILL, D. C., J. M. LISH, R. H. CALLIHAN, AND E. J. BECHNISKI. 1991. Integrated weed management - a component of integrated pest management: A critical review. Weed Technology 5:648-656.
43. [USDA-FS] US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE-FOREST SERVICE. 1998. US Forest Service strategy for noxious and non-native invasive plant management: Stemming the invasive tide. Washington, DC: USDA-FS. 29 p.
44. [USDI-BLM] US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR-BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. 1996. Partners against weeds: Final action plan for the Bureau of Land Management. Washington, DC: BLM. 43 p.
45. VANBEBBER R. 2001. CWMA cookbook: A recipe for success. Boise, ID: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Region.
46. WAGNER, C. L. 2006. Building better bridges: Community-based collaboration and social capital in northwest Colorado [thesis]. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University. 186 p.
47. WEBER, E. P. 2003. Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 317 p.
48. WOODALL, C., A. HANDLER, AND L. BROBERG. 2000. Social dilemmas in grassland ecosystem restoration: integrating ecology and community on a Montana mountainside. Ecological Restoration 18:39-44.
49. WOOLCOCK, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27:151-208.
50. WONDOLLECK, J. M., AND S. L. YAFFEE. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resources management. Washington, DC: Island Press. 277 p.
51. YAFFEE, S. L., AND J. M. WONDOLLECK. 1995. Building knowledge pools and relationsheds. Journal of Forestry 92(5):68.