Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 249, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 69-75

  Bjeloš Rončević, Mirjana ^a   Bušić, Mladen ^a   Čima, Ivan ^a   Kuzmanović Elabjer, Biljana ^a   Bosnar, Damir ^a   Miletić, Daliborka ^a  

^a University Hospital Sveti Duh   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Applanation ultrasound; Biometry; Cataract; Intraocular lens; Optical low coherence reflectometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPLANATION ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; BIOMETRY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79951723955     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1509-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J Akura S Kaneda S Hatta K Matsuura 2000 Controlling astigmatism in cataract surgery requiring relatively large self-sealing incisions J Cataract Refract Surg 26 1650 1659 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtFCjsA%3D%3D 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00484-3 11084275
2. MP Holzer M Mamusa GU Auffarth 2009 Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements Br J Ophthalmol 93 807 810 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntVSqsg%3D%3D 10.1136/bjo.2008.152736 19289385
3. O Findl W Drexler R Menapace H Heinzl CK Hitzenberger AF Fercher 2001 Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry J Cataract Refract Surg 27 861 867 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MzksFCqtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00699-4 11408132 (Pubitemid 32573691)
4. AR Reddy MV Pande P Finn H El-Gogary 2004 Comparative estimation of anterior chamber depth by ultrasonography, Orbscan II and IOLMaster J Cataract Refract Surg 30 1268 1271 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.053 15177602 (Pubitemid 38748441)
5. R Connors 3rd P Boseman 3rd JR Olson 2002 Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry J Cataract Refract Surg 28 235 238 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01179-8 11821202 (Pubitemid 34132475)
6. A Watson R Armstrong 1999 Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 27 49 51 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nvVChsQ%3D%3D 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00162.x 10080338 (Pubitemid 29166667)
7. PJ Buckhurst JS Wolffsohn S Shah SA Naroo LN Davies EJ Berrow 2009 A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients Br J Ophthalmol 93 949 953 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MvktFSquw%3D%3D 10.1136/bjo.2008.156554 19380310
8. LP Cruysberg M Doors F Verbakel TT Berendschot J De Brabander RM Nuijts 2010 Evaluation of the Lenstar LS900 non-contact biometer Br J Ophthalmol 94 106 110 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3ltlWlug%3D%3D 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729 19692383
9. K Rohrer BE Frueh R Wälti IA Clemetson C Tappeiner D Goldblum 2009 Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer Ophthalmology 116 2087 2092 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009. 04.019 19744720
10. Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644-648. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36:1066
11. Z Liampa M Kynigopoulos G Pallas H Gerding 2010 Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 227 285 288 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3nvFaisA%3D%3D 10.1055/s-0029-1245182 20408075
12. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Cataract Surgery Guidelines. http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/docs/publications/published-guidelines/ FinalVersionGuidelinesApril2007Updated.pdf (retrieved 16/08/2009; 1:43 a.m.)
13. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307 310 1:STN:280:DyaL287hslWqsQ%3D%3D 2868172 (Pubitemid 16134762)
14. J Narváez DH Cherwek RD Stulting R Waldron GJ Zimmerman IF Wessels GO Waring 3rd 2008 Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39 30 34 10.3928/15428877-20080101-08 18254348 (Pubitemid 351311094)
15. M Packer IH Fine RS Hoffman PG Coffman LK Brown 2002 Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry. Outcomes analysis J Cataract Refract Surg 28 239 242 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01259-7 11821203 (Pubitemid 34132476)
16. J Nemeth O Fekete N Pesztenlehrer 2003 Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 29 85 88 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01500-6 12551672 (Pubitemid 36152285)
17. A Vogel HB Dick F Krummenauer 2001 Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability J Cataract Refract Surg 27 1961 1968 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnpslWkug%3D%3D 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7 11738911 (Pubitemid 33136176)
18. T Olsen 2007 Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 84 87 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006. 00774.x 17244216 (Pubitemid 46140162)
19. T Olsen 2007 Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 472 485 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x 17403024 (Pubitemid 47163108)
20. S Raymond I Favilla L Santamaria 2009 Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a randomized study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2547 2552 10.1167/iovs.08-3087 19168907
21. B Kiss O Findl R Menapace M Wirtitsch V Petternel W Drexler G Rainer M Georgopoulos CK Hitzenberger AF Fercher 2002 Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry. Clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II J Cataract Refract Surg 28 230 234 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01274-3 11821201 (Pubitemid 34132474)
22. W Haigis B Lege N Miller B Schneider 2000 Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis Graefés Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238 765 773 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpvF2ltQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s004170000188
23. MS Rajan I Keilhorn JA Bell 2002 Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculation Eye 16 552 556 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjs1Srsw%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.eye.6700157 12194067
24. M Kugelberg M Lundström 2008 Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery. Swedish National Cataract Register study J Cataract Refract Surg 34 1935 1939 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.036 19006741
25. O Findl K Kriechbaum S Sacu B Kiss K Polak J Nepp G Schild G Rainer S Maca V Petternel B Lackner W Drexler 2003 Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 29 1950 1955 10.1016/S0886-3350(03) 00243-8 14604716 (Pubitemid 37385963)
26. T Olsen PJ Nielsen 1989 Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound Acta Ophthalmol 67 101 102 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzntV2ltg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19110462)
27. T Olsen 1992 Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation J Cataract Refract Surg 18 125 129 1:STN:280:DyaK383is12ktA%3D%3D 1564648 (Pubitemid 23237029)
28. TM Rabsilber C Jepsen GU Auffarth MP Holzer 2010 Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices J Cataract Refract Surg 36 230 234 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.016 20152602