Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 106-110

  Cruysberg, L P J ^a   Doors, M ^a   Verbakel, F ^a   Berendschot, T T J M ^a   De Brabander, J ^a   Nuijts, R M M A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMETER; BIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA THICKNESS; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; LENS; LENS IMPLANT; LENS POWER; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74549169139     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.161729     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Clemetson I, et al. New non-contact biometer. ARVO abstract, ARVO 2007.
2. Radhakrishnan S, Rollins AM, Roth JE, et al. Real-time optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment at 1310 nm. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1179-85.
3. Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, et al. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1843-50.
4. Lavanya R, Teo L, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1023-6.
5. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:524-34.
6. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, et al. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:458-62.
7. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, et al. High precision biometry of pseudophakic eyes using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:1087-93.
8. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1961-8.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
10. Ho T, Cheng AC, Rao SK, et al. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1177-82.
11. Li EY, Mohamed S, Leung CK, et al. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1842-7.
12. Li H, Leung CK, Wong L, et al. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2008;115:796-801.
13. Baikoff G, Jitsuo Jodai H, Bourgeon G. Measurement of the internal diameter and depth of the anterior chamber: IOLMaster versus anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:1722-8.
14. Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PC. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:477-83.
15. Kimura S, Hasebe S, Miyata M, et al. Axial length measurement using partial coherence interferometry in myopic children: repeatability of the measurement and comparison with refractive components. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:105-10.