The role of laparoscopic approach for anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 29-33

  Kwak, Jung Myun ^a   Kim, Seon Hahn ^a   Son, Dong Nyoung ^a   Kim, Jin ^a   Lee, Sun Il ^a   Min, Byung Wook ^a   Um, Jun Won ^a   Moon, Hong Young ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ABSCESS DRAINAGE; ADULT; AGE; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEFECATION; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; ILEUS; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KOREA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WOUND INFECTION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 79951687750     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2010.0407     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ansari MZ, Collopy BT, Hart WG, Carson NJ, Chandraraj EJ. In-hospital mortality and associated complications after bowel surgery in Victorian public hospitals. Aust NZ J Surg 2000;70:6-10. (Pubitemid 30104108)
2. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: Costbenefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:890-895.
3. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:255-259. (Pubitemid 38963016)
4. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021-1026. (Pubitemid 40884194)
5. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC. Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:400-404. (Pubitemid 32238704)
6. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1195-1207. (Pubitemid 41475227)
7. Ates M, Coban S, Sevil S, Terzi A. The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with peritonitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008;18:453-456.
8. Joh YG, Kim SH, Hahn KY, Stulberg J, Chung CS, Lee DK. Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic protectomy can be managed by a minimally invasive approach. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:91-96.
9. Greene FL. American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
10. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3061-3068. (Pubitemid 47224732)
11. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:44-52.
12. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1187-1192. (Pubitemid 38481844)
13. Buunen M, Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, et al. COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 2009;56:89-91.
14. Lourenco T, Murray A, Grant A, McKinley A, Krukowski Z, Vale L. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Safe and effective?-A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2008;22: 1146-1160.
15. Pera M, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, et al. The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques. Surg Endosc 2002;16:603-606. (Pubitemid 34263420)
16. Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, Bedin N. The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed?: A single-center review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1255-1262. (Pubitemid 351624385)
17. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: The LAMA Trial. World J Surg 2009; 33:1368-1373.
18. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 1996;224:131-138.
19. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002;235:313-319. (Pubitemid 34183880)
20. Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000;82:6-10. (Pubitemid 30032213)
21. Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 2006;20:14-29. (Pubitemid 43097028)
22. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Ishiguro S, Akasu T, Moriya Y. Wound infection after a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Surg Today 2008;38:618-622. (Pubitemid 351977657)