Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1195-1207

  Lunevicius, R ^a   Morkevicius, M ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PLEURISY; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCER PERFORATION; WOUND INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ANALGESICS; CLINICAL TRIALS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 26944462046     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5155     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 1006.
2. Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 1990; 4: 232-233.
3. Lau WY, Leow CK. History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg 1997; 21: 890-896.
4. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 313-319.
5. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJ et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 131-138.
6. Seelig MH, Seelig SK, Behr C, Schonleben K. Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 37: 226-229.
7. Mehendale VG, Shenoy SN, Joshi AM, Chaudhari NC. Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2002; 21: 222-224.
8. So JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 1060-1063.
9. Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 6-10.
10. Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Thoresen JE, Ystgaard B, Myrvold HE. Open vs laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 679-682.
11. Michelet I, Agresta F. Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 405-408.
12. Matsuda M, Nishiyama M, Hanai T, Saeki S, Watanabe T. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 236-240.
13. Naesgaard JM, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR. Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 209-214.
14. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1013-1021.
15. Thompson AR, Hall TJ, Anglin BA, Scott-Conner CEH. Laparoscopic plication of perforated ulcer: results of a selective approach. South Med J 1995; 88: 185-189.
16. Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, Ng SS, Dexter S, Lau WY. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 90-94.
17. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ, Campos GM, Soroushyari A, Berne TV. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 845-848; discussion 849-850.
18. Miserez M, Eypasch E, Spangenberger W, Lefering R, Troidl H. Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer. A comparison. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 831-836.
19. Kok KY, Mathew VV, Yapp SK. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Am Surg 1999; 65: 27-30.
20. Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai PB, Lau JW. Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 133-136.
21. Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 814-816.
22. McLatchie GR, Leaper DJ. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Surgery (2nd edn). Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2002.
23. Doherty GM, Lowney JK, Mason JE, Reznik SI, Smith MA (eds). The Washington Manual of Surgery (3rd edn). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2002.
24. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds). Analysing and presenting results. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Section 8. http://www.cochrane.org/ resources/handbook/hbook.htm [31 January 2004].
25. Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kahikara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. JSLS 2002; 6: 359-368.
26. Gurtner GC, Robertson CS, Chung SC, Ling TK, Ip SM, Li AK. Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on bacteraemia and endotoxaemia in an animal model of peritonitis. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 844-848.
27. Evasovich MR, Clark TC, Horattas MC, Holda S, Treen L. Does pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy increase bacterial translocation? Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 1176-1179.
28. Bloechle C, Emmerman A, Treu H, Achilles E, Mack D, Zomig C et al. Effect of a pneumoperitoneum on the extent and severity of peritonitis induced by gastric ulcer perforation in the rat. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 898-901.
29. Urbano D, Rossi M, De Simone P, Berloco P, Alfani D, Cortesini R. Alternative laparoscopic management of perforated peptic ulcers. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 1208-1211.