Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: The LAMA trial

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1368-1373

  Bertleff, Mariëtta J O E ^a   Halm, Jens A ^b   Bemelman, Willem A ^c   Van Der Ham, Arie C ^d   Van Der Harst, Erwin ^e   Oei, Hok I ^f   Smulders, J F ^g   Steyerberg, E W ^b   Lange, Johan F ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d SFG   (Netherlands)

^e Kinderafdeling   (Netherlands)

^f RdGG ^*  (Netherlands)

^g CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPIATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAPHRAGM; FEMALE; GASTRIC SUCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ULCER PERFORATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67349269929     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. SW Behrman 2005 Management of complicated peptic ulcer disease Arch Surg 140 201 208 (Pubitemid 40229113)
2. C Svanes 2000 Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis World J Surg 24 277 283 (Pubitemid 30117755)
3. R Lunevicius M Morkevicius 2005 Management strategies, early results, benefits and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer World J Surg 29 1299 1310 (Pubitemid 41625976)
4. MH Seelig SK Seelig C Behr 2003 Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers J Clin Gastroenterol 3 226 229 (Pubitemid 37010917)
5. R Lunevicius M Morkevicius 2005 Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value Langenbecks Arch Surg 390 413 420 (Pubitemid 41253175)
6. H Lau 2004 Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis Surg Endosc 18 1013 1021 (Pubitemid 38918008)
7. P Mouret Y Francois J Vignal 1990 Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer Br J Surg 77 1006 (Pubitemid 20273523)
8. Sanabria AE, Morales CH, Villegas MI (2005) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD004778
9. L Köhler 1999 Endoscopic surgery: what has passed the test? World J Surg 23 816 824 (Pubitemid 29365075)
10. R Lunevicius M Morkevicius 2005 Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers Surg Endosc 19 1565 1571 (Pubitemid 41719521)
11. WT Siu CH Chau BKB Law 2004 Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer Br J Surg 91 481 484 (Pubitemid 38491121)
12. WY Lau KL Leung KH Kwong 1996 A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique Ann Surg 224 131 138
13. S Nakajima DY Graham T Hattori 2000 Strategy for treatment of Helicobacter infections in adults. II. Practical policy in 2000 Curr Pharm Des 15 1515 1529 (Pubitemid 30764033)
14. MM Linder H Wacha U Feldmann 1987 Der Mannheimer peritonitis-index: ein instrument zur intraoperativen prognose der peritonitis Chirurg 58 84 92
15. GA Sarosi KR Jaiswal FE Nwariaku 2005 Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think Am J Surg 190 775 779 (Pubitemid 41446504)
16. S Sauerland F Agresta R Bergamaschi 2006 Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies Surg Endosc 20 14 29
17. B Kirshtein M Bayme T Mayer 2005 Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations Surg Endosc 19 1487 1490
18. WT Siu HT Leong KB Bonita 2002 Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. A randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 235 313 319 (Pubitemid 34183880)
19. MJOE Bertleff RSB Liem HL Bartels 2006 The Stamp method: a new treatment for perforated peptic ulcer? Surg Endosc 20 791 793
20. M Schein G Gecelter W Freinkel 1990 Peritoneal lavage in abdominal sepsis. A controlled clinical study Arch Surg 125 1132 1135 (Pubitemid 20283101)