The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: An in vitro study

European Spine Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 297-307

  Schilling, C ^a,b   Kruger S ^a   Grupp, T M ^a,c   Duda, G N ^b   Blomer W ^a   Rohlmann, A ^b  

^a B Braun Melsungen AG   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dynamic pedicle screw system; Intradiscal pressure; Kinematics; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FIXATION DEVICE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; LUMBAR SPINE; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RIGIDITY; SPINE; SPINE STABILIZATION;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 79951682793     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1620-6     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. P Fritzell O Hagg P Wessberg A Nordwall 2001 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group Spine 26 23 2521 2532 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnnvV2lsg%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002 11725230 (Pubitemid 33134299)
2. JC Eck SC Humphreys SD Hodges 1999 Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies Am J Orthop 28 6 336 340 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzivVehtw%3D%3D 10401898
3. CK Lee 1988 Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion Spine 13 3 375 377 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3msVKhsw%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632- 198803000-00029 3388124
4. TR Lehmann KF Spratt JE Tozzi, et al. 1987 Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients Spine 12 2 97 104 1:STN:280:DyaL2s3jsVKhtw%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-198703000-00004 2954220 (Pubitemid 17064555)
5. JD Schlegel JA Smith RL Schleusener 1996 Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions Spine 21 8 970 981 1:STN:280:DyaK283psFSqug%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00013 8726202 (Pubitemid 26127219)
6. EM Younger MW Chapman 1989 Morbidity at bone graft donor sites J Orthop Trauma 3 3 192 195 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FjvFKqsg%3D%3D 10.1097/00005131-198909000- 00002 2809818
7. JC Banwart MA Asher RS Hassanein 1995 Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation Spine 20 9 1055 1060 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzlslOhsA%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012 7631235
8. Wippermann BW, Schratt HE, Steeg S, Tscherne H (1997) [Complications of spongiosa harvesting of the ilial crest. A retrospective analysis of 1,191 cases] (Komplikationen der Spongiosaentnahme am Beckenkamm. Eine retrospektive Analyse von 1191 Fallen.). Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 68(12):1286-1291 (Pubitemid 127531651)
9. Dubois G, de Germay B, Schaerer NS, Fennema P (1999) Dynamic Neutralization: a new concept for restabilization of the spine, pp 233-240
10. Cakir B, Ulmar B, Koepp H et al (2003) (Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative instability) Dorsale dynamische Stabilisierung als Alternative zur dorso-ventralen Fusion bei Spinalkanalstenose mit degenerativer Instabilitat. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete 141(4):418-424 (Pubitemid 37093975)
11. Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk J, Perka C (2004) (Application of a dynamic pedicle screw system (DYNESYS) for lumbar segmental degenerations-comparison of clinical and radiological results for different indications) Die Anwendung eines dynamischen Pedikelschraubensystems (DYNESYS) bei lumbalen Segmentdegenerationen: ein Vergleich klinischer und radiologischer Ergebnisse bei unterschiedlichen Indikationen. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete 142(2):166-173 (Pubitemid 38594696)
12. M Putzier SV Schneider JF Funk SW Tohtz C Perka 2005 The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone Spine 30 5 E109 E114 10.1097/01.brs.0000154630.79887.ef 15738772
13. KJ Schnake S Schaeren B Jeanneret 2006 Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis Spine 31 4 442 449 10.1097/01.brs.0000200092.49001.6e 16481955 (Pubitemid 43361743)
14. TM Stoll G Dubois O Schwarzenbach 2002 The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 S170 S178 12384741
15. WC Welch BC Cheng TE Awad, et al. 2007 Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results Neurosurg Focus 22 1 E8 10.3171/foc.2007.22.1.8 17608342
16. D Grob A Benini A Junge AF Mannion 2005 Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years Spine 30 3 324 331 10.1097/01.brs.0000152584.46266.25 15682014 (Pubitemid 40209259)
17. CC Wurgler-Hauri A Kalbarczyk M Wiesli H Landolt J Fandino 2008 Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability Spine 33 3 E66 E72 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816245c0 18303447 (Pubitemid 351322944)
18. BC Cheng J Gordon J Cheng WC Welch 2007 Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion Spine 32 23 2551 2557 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318158cdbe 17978653 (Pubitemid 350059481)
19. P Gedet D Haschtmann PA Thistlethwaite SJ Ferguson 2009 Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system Eur Spine J 18 10 1504 1511 10.1007/s00586-009-1077-7 19565278
20. CA Niosi QA Zhu DC Wilson, et al. 2006 Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study Eur Spine J 15 6 913 922 10.1007/s00586-005-0948-9 16217663 (Pubitemid 43873780)
21. W Schmoelz JF Huber T Nydegger, et al. 2003 Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment J Spinal Disord Tech 16 4 418 423 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szmvVCgsw%3D%3D 12902959
22. TL Schulte C Hurschler M Haversath, et al. 2008 The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression Eur Spine J 17 8 1057 1065 10.1007/s00586-008-0667-0 18493802
23. A Rohlmann NK Burra T Zander G Bergmann 2007 Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis Eur Spine J 16 8 1223 1231 10.1007/s00586-006-0292-8 17206401 (Pubitemid 350104607)
24. H Schmidt F Heuer HJ Wilke 2009 Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system? J Biomech 42 1 48 54 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.005 19038390
25. HJ Wilke F Heuer H Schmidt 2009 Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system Spine 34 3 255 261 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181920e9c 19179920
26. Schilling C, Vieweg U, Grupp TM, Bloemer W (2008) A synthetic in vitro model for a standardized comparison of dynamic stabilization devices. J Biomech 41(S1):1
27. HJ Wilke K Wenger L Claes 1998 Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants Eur Spine J 7 2 148 154 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ptFyqsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s005860050045 9629939 (Pubitemid 28223601)
28. NR Crawford AG Brantley CA Dickman EJ Koeneman 1995 An apparatus for applying pure nonconstraining moments to spine segments in vitro Spine 20 19 2097 2100 1:STN:280:DyaK287hvVSmug%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00005 8588165
29. MM Panjabi TR Oxland I Yamamoto JJ Crisco 1994 Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 3 413 424 1:STN:280: DyaK2c7ntFylsw%3D%3D 8126047 (Pubitemid 24138935)
30. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M (1999) Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(3-4):127-132 (Pubitemid 29259524)
31. A Fujiwara TH Lim HS An, et al. 2000 The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine Spine 25 23 3036 3044 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gsFKlsA%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632- 200012010-00011 11145815
32. Arand M, Wilke HJ, Schultheiss M et al. (2000) Comparative stability of the "Internal Fixator" and the "Universal Spine System" and the effect of crosslinking transfixating systems. A biomechanical in vitro study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 45(11):311-316 (Pubitemid 32003349)
33. W Eger P Kluger L Claes HJ Wilke 1999 Characteristics of an extended internal fixation system for polysegmental transpedicular reduction and stabilization of the thoracic, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine Eur Spine J 8 1 61 69 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsFWgsw%3D%3D 10.1007/s005860050128 10190856 (Pubitemid 29217050)
34. MM Panjabi G Henderson Y James JP Timm 2007 StabilimaxNZ) versus simulated fusion: evaluation of adjacent-level effects Eur Spine J 16 12 2159 2165 10.1007/s00586-007-0444-5 17924151 (Pubitemid 350276080)
35. Quint U, Wilke HJ, Loer F, Claes L (1998) [Possibilities for static and dynamic stabilization of the spine in lesions of the anterior and posterior ligament complex] (Statische und dynamische Stabilisierungsmoglichkeiten der Wirbelsaule bei Lasionen des anterioren und posterioren Ligamentkomplexes.). Der Unfallchirurg 101(9):684-690 (Pubitemid 28462456)
36. W Schmoelz U Onder A Martin SA von 2009 Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment Eur Spine J 18 10 1478 1485 10.1007/s00586-009-1052-3 19504129
37. W Schmoelz JF Huber T Nydegger L Claes HJ Wilke 2006 Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure Eur Spine J 15 8 1276 1285 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28vnt1OktQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00586-005-0032-5 16429291 (Pubitemid 44421300)
38. AL Nachemson 1981 Disc pressure measurements Spine 6 1 93 97 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7ltlCjsg%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-198101000-00020 7209680 (Pubitemid 11191512)
39. K Sato S Kikuchi T Yonezawa 1999 In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems Spine 24 23 2468 2474 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FptFOmtg%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00008 10626309 (Pubitemid 30002983)
40. HJ Wilke P Neef M Caimi T Hoogland LE Claes 1999 New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life Spine 24 8 755 762 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jvFSgsw%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199904150-00005 10222525 (Pubitemid 29181527)
41. M Mimura MM Panjabi TR Oxland, et al. 1994 Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine Spine 19 12 1371 1380 1:STN:280:DyaK2czksFCmtg%3D%3D 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00011 8066518 (Pubitemid 24219941)
42. GS Sapkas GS Themistocleous AF Mavrogenis, et al. 2007 Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system Orthopedics 30 10 859 865 17990413 (Pubitemid 350032736)