Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: An in vitro study

European Spine Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 913-922

  Niosi, Christina A ^a   Zhu, Qingan A ^a   Wilson, Derek C ^a   Keynan, Ory ^a   Wilson, David R ^a   Oxland, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Lumbar spine; Non fusion; Stabilization; Surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; AXIS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; CAMERA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL ARTICULATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; ROTATION; SPINE INJURY; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE STABILIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 33745016686     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0948-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581-585
2. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 28:336-340
3. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M (1999) Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:127-132
4. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al (2001) Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521-2532 (discussion 32-34)
5. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:3036-3044
6. Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA (2003) Physiological axial compressive pre-loads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture. J Orthop Res 21:547-552
7. Goertzen DJ, Lane C, Oxland TR (2004) Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in vitro porcine investigation. J Biomech 37:257-261
8. Kinzel GL, Hall AS Jr, Hillberry BM (1972) Measurement of the total motion between two body segments. I. Analytical development. J Biomech 5:93-105
9. Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375-377
10. Lund T, Rathonyi G, Schlenzka D, et al (1999) The external spinal fixator does not reduce anterior column motion under axial compressive loads. A mechanical in vitro study. Acta Orthop Scand 70:37-41
11. McKinnon ME, Vickers MR, Ruddock VM, et al (1997) Community studies of the health service implications of low back pain. Spine 22:2161-2166
12. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, et al (1994) Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 19:1371-1380
13. Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, et al (2004) Does spacer length of dynamic posterior stablization system have an effect on range of motion? ISSLS 31st Annual Meeting (Poster) Porto, Portugal
14. Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Goel VK (1981) A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-ireedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine. J Biomech 14:447-460
15. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, et al (1994) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:413-424
16. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, et al (1999) A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24:1003-1009
17. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Carandang G, et al (2003) Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine. J Orthop Res 21:540-546
18. Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L, et al (2001) Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:E557-E561
19. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 21:970-981
20. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, et al (2003) Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:418-23
21. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170-S178
22. Woltring HJ, Huiskes R, de Lange A, et al (1985) Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. J Biomech 18:379-389
23. Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, et al (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14:1256-1260