Implant surface morphology and primary stability: Is there a connection?

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 40-46

  Javed, Fawad ^a   Almas, Khalid ^b   Crespi, Roberto ^c   Romanos, George E ^d  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Primary stability; Roughness characteristics; Surface

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; HUMANS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE;

EID: 79951602218     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31820867da     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rabel A, KÖ hler SG, Schmidt- Westhausen AM Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:257-265
2. Perren SM Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: Choosing a new balance between stability and biology J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:1093-1110
3. Natali AN, Carniel EL, Pavan PG Investigation of viscoelastoplastic response of bone tissue in oral implants press fit process J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:868-875
4. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, et al Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: A review J Periodontol 2008;79:1317-1329
5. Javed F, Romanos GE Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: A systematic literature review J Periodontol 2009;80:1719-1730
6. Javed F, Almas K Osseointegration of dental implants in patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment A literature review J Periodontol 2010;81:479-484
7. Hammerle HF, van Steenberghe D The first EAO consensus conference 16-19 February 2006, Pfaffikon, Schwyz, Switzerland Clin Oral Implant Res 2006; 17(suppl 2):1
8. Romanos GE Surgical and prosthetic concepts for predictable immediate loading of oral implants J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32:991-1001
9. Romanos GE Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience Implant Dent 2009;18:203-209
10. Romanos GE, Damouras M, Veis A, et al Dental implant design and primary stability A histomorphometric evaluation Presented at: 42nd Annual Meeting of IADR-Continental European and Israeli Divisions, September 26-29, 2007, Thessaloniki, Greece
11. Romanos GE Present status of immediate loading of oral implants J Oral Implantol 2004;30:189-197
12. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, et al Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants A histomorphometric study on miniature pigs J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902
13. 2-blasted titanium implants An experimental study on dogs Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84
14. 2-blasted, HA-coated,andmachined implantsAnexperimental study in rabbits J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231
15. Schwartz Z, Raz P, Zhao G, et al Effect of micrometer-scale roughness of the surface of Ti6Al4V pedicle screws in vitro and in vivo J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2485-2498
16. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, et al Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: A laboratory study Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:213-220
17. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, et al Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: A laboratory study Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:327-332
18. dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants Clin Implant Dent Relat Res In press
19. Tabassum A, Walboomers F, Wolke JG, et al The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of Titanium Screw-Type Implants Clin Implant Dent Relat Res In press
20. Tabassum A, Walboomers XF, Wolke JG, et al Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique J Dent Res 2010;89:581-586
21. Balshi AA, Assad DA, Eckert SE, et al Aretrospective study of the survival of smoothand rough-surface dental implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:1113-1118
22. Sul YT, JÖ nsson J, Yoon GS, et al Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1146-1155
23. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, et al Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: Biomechanical study in rabbit tibias J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1706-1715
24. Al-Nawas B, Groetz KA, Goetz H, et al Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1-8
25. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, et al Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:662-668
26. Al-Nawas B, Wagner W, GrÖ tz KA Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:726-732 (Pubitemid 44671936)
27. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, et al Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:641-651 (Pubitemid 37281810)
28. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, et al Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium J Dent Res 2006;85:560-565 (Pubitemid 43945497)
29. Soskolne W, Cohen S, Sennerby L, et al The effect of titanium surface roughness on the adhesion of monocytes and their secretion of TNF and PGE 2 Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13:86-93 (Pubitemid 41719944)
30. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T Structural influence from calcium phosphate coatings and its possible effect on enhanced bone integration Acta Odontol Scand In press
31. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:172-184
32. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: A prospective clinical study Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:827-832