Effective intervention for behavior with a Daily Behavior Report Card: A meta-analysis

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 654-672

  Vannest, Kimberly J ^a   Davis, John L ^a   Davis, Cole R ^a   Mason, Benjamin A ^a   Burke, Mack D ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951601726     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1994). Make things as simple as possible, but no simpler: A rejoinder to Scruggs and Mastropieri. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 885-890.
2. American Psychological Association's Division 16 & Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology. (2003). Procedural and coding manual of the Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.switzerland.k12.in.us/Rti/ RTI%20Resources%20Galore-Updated%206.28. 09/ SSSP%20EBI%20Manual.pdf
3. Atkeson B. M., & Forehand, R. (1979) Home-based reinforcement programs designed to modify classroom behavior: A review and methodological evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1298-1308.
4. Bailey, J. S., Wolf, M. W., & Phillips, E. L. (1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification or pre-delinquents' classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 223-233.
5. Barron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Barth, R. (1979). Home-based reinforcement of school behavior: A review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 49, 436-458.
7. Blechman, E. A., Schrader, S. M., & Taylor, C. J. (1981). Family problem solving versus home notes as early intervention with high-risk children. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 49, 919-926. (Pubitemid 12028271)
8. Bomstein, P. H., Rychtarik, R. G., McFall, M. E., Bridgewater, C. A., Guthrie, L., & Anton, B. (1980). Behaviorally specific report cards: Inmate. Behavior Modification, 4, 71-81.
9. Burke, M. D., & Vannest, K. J. (2008). Behavioral progress monitoring using the electronic daily behavioral report card (e-DBRC) system. Preventing School Failure, 52, 51-59.
10. Burke, M., Vannest, K., Davis, J., Davis, C., & Parker, R. (2009). Reliability of frequent retrospective behavior ratings for elementary school students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 212-222.
11. Burkwist, B. J., Mabee, W. S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1987). The effect of a daily report card system on inappropriate classroom verbalizations with a junior high school learning-disabled student. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 3, 265-272.
12. Bushrod, G., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1995). The effectiveness of a daily contract system in reducing inappropriate behaviors of two kindergarten children. BC Journal of Special Education, 19, 45-53.
13. Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McDougal, J. L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate? Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157-169.
14. Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Sassu, K. A. (2006). Acceptability and reported use of daily behavior report cards among teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 174-182.
15. Coleman, R. G. (1973). A procedure for fading from experimenter-school- based to parent-home-based control of classroom behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 71-79.
16. Cottone, E. A. (1998). Home-school collaboration: Evaluating the effectiveness of a school-home not program for children with ADHD. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2442A. (UMI No. 9840485)
17. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage.
18. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
19. Cowart, L. U. (1999). The efficacy of a school-home note in reducing disruptive classroom behavior: The differential effects of selecting social and academic targets. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 4869B. (UMI No. 9947683)
20. Crone, D. A., Horner, R. H., & Hawken, L. S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford Press.
21. Davies, D. E., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). Effects of a daily report card on disruptive behaviour in primary students. B C Journal of Special Education, 13, 173-181.
22. Dougherty, E. H., & Dougherty, A. (1977). The daily report card: A simplified and flexible package for classroom behavior management. In L. A. Herson & M. Berger (Eds.), Aggression and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence (pp. 73-93). London: Pergamon Press.
23. Edlund, C. V. (1969). Rewards at home to promote desirable school behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1, 121-127.
24. Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Consumer or producer of assistive technology research: Has NCLB altered your role? Closing the Gap, 23, 12-13.
25. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965). PL 89-10, 19 Stat. 27, 20 U.S.C. Ch 70.
26. Forness, S. R. (2001). Special education and related services: What have we learned from meta-analysis? Exceptionality, 9, 185-197.
27. Franz, D. P., Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Hasbrouck, J. E., Dyer, N., & Davis, J. L. (2008). Time use by special education teachers and how it is valued. Journal of School Leadership, 18, 551-576.
28. Gable, L. F. (2002). The efficacy of a school-home note intervention using internet communication for decreasing inappropriate classroom behaviors of secondary level students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 496A. (UMI No. 3043147)
29. Hawkin, L. S., & Horner, R. (2003). Implementing a target intervention within a school-wide system of behavioral support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 225-240.
30. Hintze, J. (2002). NCSS and PASS: Number Cruncher Statistical Systems [Computer software). Kaysville, UT.
31. Hintze, J. M., & Matthews, W. M. (2004). The generalizability of systematic direct observations across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 258-270. (Pubitemid 39051390)
32. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610.
33. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, J., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179. (Pubitemid 40273033)
34. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.G §1400 et seq. (2004).
35. Jurbergs, N., Paleie, J., & Kelley, M. L. (2007). Schoolhome notes with and without response cost: Increasing attention and academic performance in low-income children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 358-379.
36. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Kelley, M. L., & McCain, A. P. (1995). Promoting academic performance in inattentive children. The relative efficacy of school-home notes with and without response cost. Behavior Modification, 19, 357-375.
38. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc-scd. pdf
39. Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). (1992). Singlecase research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Leach, D. J., & Byrne, M. K. (1986). Some "spill-over" effects of a home-based reinforcement programme in a secondary school. Educational Psychology, 6, 265-276.
41. Linden Software, Ltd. (1998). i-extractor [Graph digitizing software]. United Kingdom: Author.
42. Long, N., & Edwards, M. (1994). The use of a daily report card to address children's school behavior problems. Contemporary Education, 65, 152-155.
43. Martin, R. C., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1981). A comparison between the effects of free time and daily report cards on the academic behavior of junior high school students. B C Journal of Special Education, 5, 303-313.
44. McCain, A. P., & Kelley, M. L. (1993). Managing the classroom behavior of an ADHD preschooler: The efficacy of a school-home note intervention. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 15, 33-44.
45. McCain, A. P., & Kelley, M. L. (1994). Improving classroom performance in underachieving preadolescents: The additive effects of response cost to a school-home note. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 16, 27-41.
46. McLaughlin, M. W. (1975) Evaluation and reform: The elementary and secondary education act of 1965, Title I. Cambridge, MA: Ballenger Publishing.
47. Mostert, M. P. (2001). Characteristics of meta-analyses reported in mental retardation, learning disabilities, and emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 9, 199-225.
48. National Academy of Sciences. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: US. National Academy Press, Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12480.html
49. Parker, R. I. (2006). Increased reliability for single-case research results: Is the bootstrap the answer? Behavior Therapy, 37, 326-338.
50. Parker, R. I., Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K. J., Long, J. R., De-Alba, R. G., Baugh, F. G., et al. (2005). Effect sizes in single case research: How large is large? School Psychology Review, 34, 116-132. (Pubitemid 40554400)
51. Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percent of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194-204.
52. Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. J. (2009). An improved effect size for single case research: Non-overlap of all pairs (NAP). Behavior Therapy, 40, 357-367.
53. Parker, R., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135-150.
54. Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., & Schenker, N. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance? Journal of Insect Science, 3, 1-6.
55. Pelham, W. E. (1993). Pharmacomerapy for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 22, 199-227.
56. Pelham, W. E., Hoza, B., Pillow, D. R., Gnagy, E. M., Kipp, H. L., Greiner, A. R., et al. (2002). The effects of methylphenidate and expectancy on children with ADHD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 320-325.
57. Schumaker, J. B., Hovell, M. F., & Sherman, J. A. (1977). An analysis of daily behavior report cards and parentmanaged privileges in the improvement of adolescents' classroom performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 449-464.
58. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications, Exceptionality, 9, 227-244.
59. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24-33.
60. Sluyter, D. J., & Hawkins, R. P. (1972). Delayed reinforcement of classroom behavior by parents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 16-24.
61. Smith, M. A., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). The Daily Report Card as an intervention technique for classroom academic and social behavior: A review. B C Journal of Special Education, 7, 369-380.
62. Steege, M. W., Davin, T., & Hathaway, M. (2001). Reliability and accuracy of a performance-based behavioral recording procedure. School Psychology Review, 30, 252-261.
63. Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1989). Analyzing quantitative behavior observation data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Vannest, K. J., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2010). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 126-142.
65. Vannest, K. J., & Parker, R. I. (2010). Measuring teacher time: The stability of special education teacher time use. Journal of Special Education. 44, 94-106.
66. Vannest, K. J. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. (2008). BASC-2 intervention guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson
67. White, O. R. (1987). Some comments concerning: "The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research." Remedial and Special Education, 8, 34-39.
68. Witt, J. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Martens, B. K. (1983). Home-based reinforcement: Behavioral covariation between academic performance and inappropriate behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 337-348.