3-D shear wave radially and azimuthally anisotropic velocity model of the North American upper mantle

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 184, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1237-1260

  Yuan, Huaiyu ^a   Romanowicz, Barbara ^a   Fischer, Karen M ^b   Abt, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cratons; North America; Seismic anisotropy; Seismic tomography

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS; AZIMUTHAL ANISOTROPY; CRATONS; FAST AXIS; HOT SPOT; KEY FEATURE; LATERAL RESOLUTION; MANTLE DEFORMATION; MANTLE DYNAMICS; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH AMERICAN; OCEANIC REGIONS; RADIAL ANISOTROPY; RAPID CHANGES; RECEIVER FUNCTIONS; REFERENCE FRAME; ROCKY MOUNTAINS; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; SEISMIC WAVEFORMS; SHEAR VELOCITIES; SMALL-SCALE CONVECTION; SPLITTING MEASUREMENTS; TECTONIC HISTORY; TWO LAYERS; UPPER MANTLE; VELOCITY MODEL; WESTERN UNITED STATES;

IGNEOUS ROCKS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SEISMOGRAPHS; SEISMOLOGY; SHEAR FLOW; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY;

ANISOTROPY;

ASTHENOSPHERE; AZIMUTH; CRATON; DEFORMATION; HOT SPOT; LITHOSPHERE; MANTLE CONVECTION; MANTLE DISCONTINUITY; MANTLE STRUCTURE; PLATE MOTION; S-WAVE; SAN ANDREAS FAULT; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; UPPER MANTLE; VELOCITY STRUCTURE; WAVE SPLITTING;

ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951581323     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04901.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abt, D., Fischer, K.M., French, S.W., Ford, H.A., Yuan, H.Y. & Romanowicz, B., 2010. North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions, J. geophys. Res, 115, B09301, doi:.
2. Armstrong, R.L., Taubeneck, W.H. & Hales, P.O., 1977. Rb-Sr and K-Ar geochronometry of Mesozoic granitic rocks and their Sr isotopic composition, Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 88, 397-411.
3. Artemieva, I.M., 2009. The continental lithosphere: reconciling thermal, seismic, and petrologic data, Lithos, 109, 23-46.
4. Atwater, T., 1970. Implications of plate tectonics for the cenozoic tectonic evolution of western North America, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 81, 3513-3536.
5. Bank, C.-G., Bostock, M.G., Ellis, R.M., Hajnal, Z. & VanDecar, J.C., 1998. Lithospheric mantle structure beneath the Trans-Hudson Orogen and the origin of diamondiferous kimberlites, J. geophys. Res., 103, 10 103-10 114.
6. Bassin, C., Laske, G. & Masters, G., 2000. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 81, F897.
7. Bastow, I.D., Thompson, D., Wookey, J., Kendall, J.M., Helffrich, G., Snyder, D., Eaton, D. & Darbyshire, F.A., 2010. Precambrian plate tectonics: seismic evidence from northern Hudson Bay, Geology, G31396, 91-94, doi:.
8. Becker, T.W., Schulte-Pelkum, V., Blackman, D.K., Kellogg, J.B. & O'Connell, R.J., 2006. Mantle flow under the western United States from shear wave splitting, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 247, 235-251.
9. Bedle, H. & van der Lee, S., 2009. S velocity variations beneath North America, J. geophys. Res., 114, doi:.
10. Bonnin, M., Barruol, G. & Bokelmann, G.H.R., 2010. Upper mantle deformation beneath the North American-Pacific plate boundary in California from SKS splitting, J. geophys. Res., 115, B04306, doi:.
11. Bostock, M.G., 1998. Mantle stratigraphy and evolution of the Slave Province, J. geophys. Res., 103, 21 183-121 200.
12. Burchfiel, B.C., Cowan, D.S. & Davis, G.A., 1992. Tectonic overview of the Cordilleran Orogen in the Western United States, in The Cordilleran Orogen; Conterminous U.S., pp. 407-479, eds Burchfiel, B.C., Lipman, P.W. & Zoback, M. L., Geol. Soc. Am., United States, Boulder, Colorado.
13. Burdick, S. et al., 2009. Model update December 2008: upper mantle heterogeneity beneath North America from P-wave travel time tomography with global and USArray Transportable Array Data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 80, 638-645.
14. Capdeville, Y., Larmat, C., Vilotte, J.P. & Montagner, J.P., 2002. A new coupled spectral element and modal solution method for global seismology: a first application to the scattering induced by a plume-like anomaly, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, doi.
15. Chen, C., Rondenay, S., Weeraratne, D.S. & Snyder, D.B., 2007. New constraints on the upper mantle structure of the Slave craton from Rayleigh wave inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, doi:.
16. Chevrot, S., 2000. Multichannel analysis of shear wave splitting, J. geophys. Res., 105, 21 579-521 590.
17. Courtier, A.M., Gaherty, J.B., Revenaugh, J., Bostock, M.G. & Garnero, E.J., 2010. Seismic anisotropy associated with continental lithosphere accretion beneath the CANOE array, northwestern Canada, Geology, 38, 887-890, doi:.
18. Craven, J.C., Kurtz, R.D., Boerner, D.E., Skulski, T., Spratt, J., Ferguson, I.J., Wu, X. & Bailey, R.C., 2001. Conductivity of western Superior Province upper mantle in northwestern Ontario, Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research 2001-E6, 6.
19. Dahl, P.S., Holm, D.K., Gardner, E.T., Hubacher, F.A. & Foland, K.A., 1999. New constraints on the timing of Early Proterozoic tectonism in the Black Hills (South Dakota), with implications for docking of the Wyoming province with Laurentia, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 111, 1335-1349.
20. Darbyshire, F.A. & Lebedev, S., 2009. Rayleigh wave phase-velocity heterogeneity and multilayered azimuthal anisotropy of the Superior Craton, Ontario, Geophys. J. Int., 176, 215-234.
21. DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F. & Stein, S., 1994. Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2191-2194.
22. Deschamps, F., Lebedev, S., Meier, T. & Trampert, J., 2008. Stratified seismic anisotropy reveals past and present deformation beneath the East-central United States, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 274, 489-498.
23. Dueker, K., Yuan, H. & Zurek, B., 2001. Thick-structured Proterozoic lithosphere of the Rocky Mountain region, GSA Today, 11, 4-9.
24. Eakin, C.M., Obrebski, M., Allen, R.M., Boyarko, D.C., Brudzinski, M.R. & Porritt, R., 2010.Seismic anisotropy beneath Cascadia and the Mendocino triple junction: interaction of the subducting slab with mantle flow, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 297, 627-632.
25. Eaton, D.W., Darbyshire, F., Evans, R.L., Grütter, H., Jones, A.G. & Yuan, X., 2009. The elusive lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons, Lithos, 109, 1-22.
26. Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H. & Bunge, H.-P., 2010. Full waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure: new insights into present and past states of the Australasian upper mantle, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 290, 270-280.
27. Ford, H.A., Fischer, K.M., Abt, D.L., Rychert, C.A. & Elkins-Tanton, L. T., 2010. The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary and cratonic lithospheric layering beneath Australia from Sp wave imaging, Earth. planet. Sci. Lett., 300, 299-310, doi:.
28. Frederiksen, A.W., Bostock, M.G. & Cassidy, J.F., 2001. S-wave velocity structure of the Canadian upper mantle, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 124, 175-191.
29. Frederiksen, A.W., Ferguson, I.J., Eaton, D., Miong, S.K. & Gowan, E., 2006. Mantle fabric at multiple scales across an Archean-Proterozoic boundary, Grenville Front, Canada, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 158, 240-263.
30. Gaherty, J.B., 2004. A surface wave analysis of seismic anisotropy beneath eastern North America, Geophys. J. Int., 158, 1053-1066.
31. Griffin, W.L., O'Reilly, S.Y., Doyle, B.J., Pearson, N.J., Coopersmith, H., Kivi, K., Malkovets, V. & Pokhilenko, N., 2004. Lithosphere mapping beneath the North American plate, Lithos, 77, 873-922.
32. Gripp, A.E. & Gordon, R.G., 2002. Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 321-361.
33. Hoffman, P.F., 1989. Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America, in The Geology of North America-An Overview, pp. 447-512, eds Bally, A.W. & Palmer, A.R., Geology Society of America, Boulder, CO.
34. Humphreys, E., Erslev, E., Atwater, T., Hessler, E., Dueker, K. & Farmer, G.L., 2003. How laramide-age hydration of North American Lithosphere by the Farallon Slab controlled subsequent activity in the Western United States, Int. Geol. Rev., 45, 575-595.
35. Jones, A.G., Ferguson, I.J., Chave, A.D., Evans, R.L. & McNeice, G.W., 2001. Electric lithosphere of the Slave craton, Geology, 29, 423-426.
36. Jones, A.G., Ledo, J. & Ferguson, I.J., 2005. Electromagnetic images of the Trans-Hudson orogen: the North American Central Plains anomaly revealed, Can. J. Earth Sci., 42(4), 457-478, doi:.
37. Kreemer, C., Blewitt, G. & Bennett, R.A., 2010. Present-day motion and deformation of the Colorado Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L10311.
38. Kustowski, B., Ekstrom, G. & Dziewonski, A.M., 2008. Anisotropic shear-wave velocity structure of the Earth's mantle: a global model, J. geophys. Res, 113, doi:.
39. Lebedev, S., Boonen, J. & Trampert, J., 2009. Seismic structure of Precambrian lithosphere: new constraints from broad-band surface-wave dispersion, Lithos, 109, 96-111.
40. Lekic, V., Panning, M. & Romanowicz, B., 2010. A simple method for improving crustal corrections in waveform tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 265-278.
41. Lekic, V. & Romanowicz, B., 2010. Inferring upper mantle structure by full waveform tomography with the Spectral Element Method, Geophys. J. Int., submitted.
42. Levin, V., Menke, W. & Park, J., 1999. Shear wave splitting in the Appalachians and the Urals; a case for multilayered anisotropy, J. geophys. Res., 104, 17 975-17 994.
43. Li, A., Forsyth, D. & Fisher, K., 2005. Rayleigh wave constraints on shear-wave structure and azimuthal anisotropy beneath the Colorado Rocky Mountains, in The Rocky Mountain Region-An Evolving Lithosphere: Tectonics, Geochemistry, and Geophysics, AGU Monograph, pp. 385-401, eds K., K. & Keller, R., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
44. Li, A., Forsyth, D.W. & Fischer, K.M., 2003. Shear velocity structure and azimuthal anisotropy beneath eastern North America from Rayleigh wave inversion, J. geophys. Res., 108, 24, doi:.
45. Li, X.-D. & Romanowicz, B., 1995. Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling, Geophys. J. Int., 121, 695-709.
46. Li, X. & Romanowicz, B., 1996. Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory, J. geophys. Res, 101, 22 245-22 273.
47. Liu, K.H., 2009. NA-SWS-1.1: a uniform database of teleseismic shear wave splitting measurements for North America, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 10, doi:.
48. Long, M.D., Gao, H., Klaus, A., Wagner, L.S., Fouch, M.J., James, D.E. & Humphreys, E., 2009. Shear wave splitting and the pattern of mantle flow beneath eastern Oregon, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 288, 359-369.
49. Marone, F., Gung, Y. & Romanowicz, B., 2007. Three-dimensional radial anisotropic structure of the North American upper mantle from inversion of surface waveform data, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 206-222.
50. Marone, F. & Romanowicz, B., 2007. The depth distribution of azimuthal anisotropy in the continental upper mantle, Nature, 447, 198-201.
51. Mégnin, C. & Romanowicz, B., 2000. The three-dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher-mode waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 709-728.
52. Menke, W., 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory (revised Edition), Academic, San Diego.
53. Miller, M.S. & Eaton, D.W., 2010. Formation of cratonic mantle keels by arc accretion: evidence from S receiver functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18305.
54. Montagner, J.-P. & Anderson, D.L., 1989. Petrological constraints on seismic anisotropy, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 54, 82-105.
55. Montagner, J.-P., Griot-Pommera, D.-A. & Lave, J., 2000. How to relate body wave and surface wave anisotropy? J. geophys. Res., 105, 19 015-019 027.
56. Montagner, J.-P. & Nataf, H.-C., 1986. A simple method for inverting the azimuthal anisotropy of surface waves, J. geophys. Res., 91, 511-520.
57. Moorkamp, M., Jones, A.G. & Eaton, D.W., 2007. Joint inversion of teleseismic receiver functions and magnetotelluric data using a genetic algorithm: are seismic velocities and electrical conductivities compatible?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, doi:.
58. Moucha, R., Forte, A.M., Rowley, D.B., Mitrovica, J.X., Simmons, N.A. & Grand, S.P., 2008. Mantle convection and the recent evolution of the Colorado Plateau and the Rio Grande Rift valley, Geology, 36, 439-442.
59. Moucha, R., Forte, A.M., Rowley, D.B., Mitrovica, J.X., Simmons, N.A. & Grand, S.P., 2009. Deep mantle forces and the uplift of the Colorado Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, doi:.
60. Nettles, M. & Dziewoński, A.M., 2008. Radially anisotropic shear velocity structure of the upper mantle globally and beneath North America, J. geophys. Res., 113, doi:.
61. Nicolas, A. & Christensen, N.I., 1987. Formation of anisotropy in upper mantle peridotites-a review, in Composition, Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere System (Geodynamics Series), pp. 111-123, eds. Fuchs, K. & Froidevaux, C., AGU.
62. Obrebski, M., Allen, R.M., Xue, M. & Hung, S.-H., 2010. Slab-plume interaction beneath the Pacific Northwest, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L14305, doi:.
63. Panning, M. & Romanowicz, B., 2006. A three-dimensional radially anisotropic model of shear velocity in the whole mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 361-379.
64. Park, J. & Levin, V., 2002. Seismic Anisotropy: tracing plate dynamics in the mantle, Science, 296, 485-489.
65. Percival, J.A., Sanborn-Barrie, M., Skulski, T., Stott, G.M., Helmstaedt, H. & White, D.J., 2006. Tectonic evolution of the western Superior Province from NATMAP and Lithoprobe studies, Can. J. Earth Sci., 43(7), doi:.
66. Plomerová, J. & Babuska, V., 2010. Long memory of mantle lithosphere fabric-European LAB constrained from seismic anisotropy, Lithos, doi:.
67. Polet, J. & Kanamori, H., 2002. Anisotropy beneath California; shear wave splitting measurements using a dense broadband array, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 313-317.
68. Romanowicz, B., 2009. The thickness of tectonic plates, Science, 324, 474-476.
69. Romanowicz, B.A., Panning, M.P., Gung, Y. & Capdeville, Y., 2008. On the computation of long period seismograms in a 3-D earth using normal mode based approximations, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 520-536.
70. Rychert, C.A. & Shearer, P.M., 2009. A global view of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Science, 324, 495-498.
71. Sigloch, K., McQuarrie, N. & Nolet, G., 2008. Two-stage subduction history under North America inferred from multiple-frequency tomography, Nat. Geosci., 1, 458-462.
72. Silver, P.G. & Chan, W.W., 1991. Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation, J. geophys. Res., 96, 16 429-416 454.
73. Silver, P.G. & Holt, W.E., 2002. The mantle flow field beneath western North America, Science, 295, 1054-1058.
74. Sine, C.R., Wilson, D., Gao, W., Grand, S.P., Aster, R., Ni, J. & Baldridge, W.S., 2008. Mantle structure beneath the western edge of the Colorado Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, doi:.
75. Snyder, D.B., 2008. Stacked uppermost mantle layers within the Slave craton of NW Canada as defined by anisotropic seismic discontinuities, Tectonics, 27, doi:.
76. Snyder, D.B., Rondenay, S., Bostock, M.G. & Lockhart, G.D., 2004. Mapping the mantle lithosphere for diamond potential using teleseismic methods, Lithos, 77, 859-872.
77. St-Onge, M.R., Wodicka, N. & Ijewliw, O., 2007. Polymetamorphic evolution of the trans-Hudson Orogen, Baffin Island, Canada: integration of petrological, structural and geochronological data, J. Petrol., 48, 271-302.
78. Tarantola, A. & Valette, B., 1982. Beneralized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion, Rev. geophys. Space Phys., 20, 219-232.
79. Thomas, W.A., 2006. Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin, GSA Today, 16, doi:.
80. Thybo, H., 2006. The heterogeneous upper mantle low velocity zone, Tectonophysics, 416, 53-79.
81. Thybo, H. & Perchuc, E., 1997. The seismic 8° discontinuity and partial melting in continental mantle, Science, 275, 1626-1629.
82. Van Der Lee, S., 2002. High-resolution estimates of lithospheric thickness from Missouri to Massachusetts, USA, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 203, 15-23.
83. Van Der Lee, S. & Nolet, G., 1997a. Upper mantle S velocity structure of North America, J. geophys. Res., 102, 22 815-22 838.
84. Van Der Lee, S. & Nolet, G., 1997b. Seismic image of the subducted trailing fragments of the Farallon Plate, Nature 386, 266-269.
85. Vinnik, L.P., Kind, R., Makeyeva, L.I. & Kosarev, G.L., 1989. Azimuthal anisotropy in the lithosphere from observations of long-period S-waves, Geophys. J. Int., 99, 549-559.
86. Wang, Z. & Dahlen, F.A., 1995. Spherical-spline parameterization of three-dimensional Earth models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3099-3102.
87. Wernicke, B., 1992. Cenozoic extensional tectonics of the U.S. Cordillera, in The Geology of North America, G-3, pp. 553-583, eds Burchfiel, B.C., Lipman, P.W. & Zoback, M.L., Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.
88. West, J.D., Fouch, M.J., Roth, J.B. & Elkins-Tanton, L.T., 2009. Vertical mantle flow associated with a lithospheric drip beneath the Great Basin, Nat. Geosci., 2, 439-444.
89. Whitmeyer, S.J. & Karlstrom, K.E., 2007. Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America, Geosphere, 3, 220-259.
90. Wilson, D. et al., 2005. Lithospheric structure of the Rio Grande rift, Nature, 433, 851-855.
91. Xue, M. & Allen, R.M., 2010. Mantle Structure Beneath the Western US and its Implications for convection Processes, J. geophys. Res, 115, doi:.
92. Yuan, H. & Dueker, K., 2005. Upper mantle tomographic Vp and Vs images of the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico: evidence for thick, laterally heterogeneous lithosphere, in The Rocky Mountain Region-An Evolving Lithosphere: Tectonics, Geochemistry, and Geophysics, pp. 329-345, eds. Randy, G. & Karlstrom, K.E., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
93. Yuan, H. & Romanowicz, B., 2010a. Depth dependent azimuthal anisotropy in the western US upper mantle, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 300, 385-394, doi:.
94. Yuan, H. & Romanowicz, B., 2010b. Lithospheric layering in the North American craton, Nature, 466, 1063-1068.
95. Yuan, X., Kind, R., Xueqing, L. & Rongjiang, W., 2006. The S receiver functions: synthetics and data example, Geophys. J. Int., 165, 555-564.