Mapping the Identity of a Viewed Hand in the Motor System: Evidence From Stimulus-Response Compatibility

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 207-221

  Vainio, Lari ^a   Mustonen, Terhi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hand representation; Motor system; Stimulus response compatibility; Visuomotor processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951518819     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021432     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Avikainen S., Wohlschläger A., Liuhanen S., Hänninen R., Hari R. Impaired mirror-image imitation in asperger and high-functioning autistic subjects. Current Biology 2003, 13:339-341.
2. Booth J.R., Burman D.D., Meyer J.R., Lei Z., Trommer B.L., Davenport N.D., Mesulam M.M. Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition. Neuroimage 2003, 20:737-751.
3. Botvinick M., Cohen J.D. Rubber hand 'feels' what eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
4. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschlager A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44:124-143.
5. Chiavarino C., Apperly I.A., Humphreys G.W. Exploring the functional and anatomical bases of mirror-image and anatomical imitation: The role of the frontal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:784-795.
6. Craighero L., Bello A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:492-502.
7. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 91:176-180.
8. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1737-1747.
9. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:7-26.
10. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119:593-609.
11. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research 1994, 56:261-268.
12. Humphreys G.W., Boucart M. Selection by colour and form in vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 25:136-153.
13. Iacoboni M., Woods R.P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999, 286:2526-2528.
14. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, MacMillan, New York, NY.
15. Kornblum S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research 1994, 56:130-135.
16. Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology 2003, 13:531-539.
17. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977, 198:75-78.
18. Neumann O. Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research 1990, 52:207-225.
19. Nishitani N., Hari R. Viewing lip forms: Cortical dynamics. Neuron 2002, 36:1211-1220.
20. Ottoboni G., Tessari A., Cubelli R., Umiltà C. Is handedness recognition automatic? A study using a Simon-like paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:778-789.
21. Parson L.M. Imagined spatial transformation of one's hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:178-241.
22. Parson L.M. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:709-730.
23. Parsons L.M., Gabrieli J.D.E., Phelps E.A., Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebrally lateralized mental representations of hand shape and movement. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:6539-6548.
24. Phillips J., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time-course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:540-558.
25. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
26. Ristic J., Friesen C.K., Kingstone A. Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:507-513.
27. Ristic J., Kingstone A. Attention to arrows: Pointing to a new direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1921-1930.
28. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
29. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 3:131-141.
30. Schofield W.N. Do children find movements which cross the body midline difficult?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1976, 28:571-582.
31. Shmuelof L., Zohary E. A mirror representation of others' actions in the human anterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:9736-9742.
32. Shmuelof L., Zohary E. Mirror-image representation of action in the anterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1267-1269.
33. Simon J.R. Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:174-176.
34. Strümer B., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 26:1746-1759.
35. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
36. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
37. Urgesi C., Moro V., Candidi M., Aglioti S.M. Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:7942-7949.
38. Vainio L. Interrupted object-based updating of reach program leads to a negative compatibility effect. Journal of Motor Behavior 2009, 41:305-315.
39. Vainio L., Ellis R., Tucker M. The role of visual attention in action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:241-261.
40. Vainio L., Tucker M., Ellis R. Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping. Brain and Cognition 2007, 65:195-207.
41. Vogt S., Taylor P., Hopkins B. Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: Perspective matters. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:941-951.
42. Wang C., Ulbert I., Schomer D.L., Marinkovic K., Halgren E. Response of human anterior cingulated cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 19:604-613.
43. Wapner S., Cirillo L. Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transposition of left-right relations. Child Development 1968, 39:887-894.
44. Wiegand K., Wascher E. Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2005, 71:401-410.