Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information

Energy Economics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 685-707

  McFarland, J R ^a   Reilly, J M ^a   Herzog, H J ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Energy technology; General equilibrium modeling

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; NATURAL GAS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

CARBON EMISSIONS; COAL-BASED TECHNOLOGY; LOW-CARBON EMITTING TECHNOLOGY;

ENERGY POLICY;

CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; EMISSION CONTROL; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 9144269081     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Babiker, M., Reilly, J., Mayer, M., Eckaus, R., Sue-Wing, I., Hyman, R., 2001. The emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model: Update, sensitivity, and comparison of results, Report no. 71. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. MIT, Cambridge, MA
2. Biggs, S., 2000. Sequestering carbon from power plants: The jury is still out, MS thesis. Technology and Policy Program. MIT, Cambridge, MA
3. 2 capture and sequestration Presented at the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia 2000
4. Bush, G.W., February 14, 2002, Press release. See also the Administration's Global Climate Change Policy Book
5. David J. Herzog H. The cost of carbon capture Presented at the Fifth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Cairns, Australia 2000
6. Dooley, J., Edmonds, J., Wise, M., 1999. The role of carbon capture and sequestration in a long-term technology strategy of atmospheric stabilization. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory paper PNNL-SA-30206
7. 2 capture and disposal, Report no. 15. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. MIT, Cambridge, MA
8. Geroski P.A. Models of technology diffusion Research Policy 29 2000 603-625
9. Hayashi F. Tobin's marginal q and average 1: A neoclassical interpretation Econometrica 50 1982 213-224
10. Hertel T. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications 1997 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, UK
11. 2 separation and capture Technology 17 Supplement 1 2000 13-23
12. IPCC. In: Metz B. Davidson O. Swart R. Pan J. (Eds.). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge, UK 180, 352-353
13. Jacoby H. Sue-Wing I. Adjustment time, capital malleability and policy cost The Energy Journal 1999 73-92 (Special Issue)
14. Kim, S., Edmonds, J., 2000. Potential for advanced carbon capture and sequestration technologies in a climate constrained world. Pacific Northwest National Lab report 13095
15. Reilly J. Prinn R. Harnisch J. Fitzmaurice J. Jacoby H. Kicklighter D. Melillo J. Stone P. Sokolov A. Wang C. Multi-gas assessment of the kyoto protocol Nature 401 1999 549-555
16. U.S. Department of Energy, 1999. Supporting Analysis for the Comprehensive Electricity Competition Act. Office of Economic, Electricity and Natural Gas Analysis and Office of Policy, Report no. DOE/PO-0059, May
17. U.S. Department of Energy, 2000. Electric power annual 1999 volume II. Energy Information Administration. Report no.DOE/EIA-0348(99)/2, October
18. van der Zwaan B.C.C. Gerlagh R. Klaassen G. Schrattenholzer L. Endogenous technical change in climate change modeling Energy Economics 24 2002 1-19