Macintosh and Glidescope® performance by advanced cardiac life support providers: A manikin study

Minerva Anestesiologica

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-16

  Stroumpoulis, K ^a   Xanthos, T ^b   Bassiakou, E ^b   Iacovidou, N ^c   Koudouna, E ^b   Michaloliakou, C ^a   Papadimitriou, L ^b  

^a METAXA CANCER HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Laryngoscopy; Life support systems; Manikins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPE BLADE; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RESUSCITATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; MANIKINS; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951492069     PISSN: 03759393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Winchell RJ, Hoyt DB. Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury. Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego. Arch Surg 1997;132:592-7.
2. Nolan JP, Soar J. Airway techniques and ventilation strategies. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008;14:279-86.
3. Gerbeaux P. Should emergency medical service rescuers be trained to practice endotracheal intubation? Critical Care Medicine 2005,33:1864-5.
4. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, MacQuarrie K, Law JA, Pytka S et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003;98:23-7.
5. Agrò FE, Cataldo R, Mattei A. New devices and techniques for airway management. Minerva Anestesiol 2009;75:141- 9.
6. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (Glide- Scope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:191-8.
7. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Liu J, Li XY, Yang QY, Xu YC et al. The clinical assessment of Glidescope in orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2007;73:451-7.
8. Stroumpoulis K, Pagoulatou A, Violari M, Ikonomou I, Kalantzi N, Kastrinaki K et al. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:218-22.
9. Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, Baeriswyl V, Clergue F, Waeber JL. Learning curves of the Glidescope, the Mc- Grath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:554-8.
10. Tan BH, Liu EH, Lim RT, Liow LM, Goy RW. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Airway Scope by novice operators in simulated easy and difficult airways-a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2009;64:187-90.
11. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngos- copy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009;110:32-7.
12. Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, Cho J, Lee HS, Park YS. Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios. Emerg Med J 2008;25:279-82.
13. Fiadjoe JE, Stricker PA, Hackell RS, Salam A, Gurnaney H, Rehman MA et al. The efficacy of the Storz Miller 1 Video Laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation. An- esth Analg 2009;108:1783-6.
14. Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I, Malik MA, O'Donnell J, Higgins BD et al. Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. BMC Emergency Medicine 2009;9:2.
15. Mort TC. Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: a report on patient morbidity. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:255-62.
16. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004;99:607-13.
17. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005;67(Suppl. 1):S39-86.
18. Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:381-4.
19. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Liu J, Li XY, Yang QY, Xu YC et al. The clinical assessment of Glidescope in orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2007;73:451- 7.
20. Lai HY, Chen IH, Chen A, Hwang FY, Lee Y. The use of the GlideScope for tracheal intubation in patients with an- kylosing spondylitis. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:419-22.
21. Marrel J, Blanc C, Frascarolo P, Magnusson L. Videolaryn- goscopy improves intubation condition in morbidly obese patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007;24:1045-9.
22. Narang AT, Oldeg PF, Medzon R, Mahmood AR, Spector JA, Robinett DA. Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation. Simul Healthc 2009;4:160-5.
23. Lim Y, Yeo SW. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33:243-7.
24. Aziz M, Dillman D, Kirsch JR, Brambrink A. Video laryn- goscopy with the macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated prehospital scenarios by paramedic students. Prehosp Emerg Care 2009;13:251-5.
25. Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 2005;60:60-4.
26. Doyle DJ. The glidescope video laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2005;60:414-5.
27. Cuchillo JV, Rodriguez MA. Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new videolaryngoscope. Can J Anesth 2005;52:661.
28. Maassen R, Lee R, Hermans B, Marcus M, van Zundert A. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1560-5.
29. Turkstra TP, Jones PM, Ower KM, Gros ML. The flex- It stylet is less effective than a malleable stylet for oro- tracheal intubation using the GlideScope. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1856-9.
30. Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, Jones PM. The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:891-6.
31. Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C: Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training. Anesth Analg 2006;103:458-62.
32. Timmermann A, Russo SG, Crozier TA, Eich C, Mundt B, Albrecht B et al. Novices ventilate and intubate quicker and safer via intubating laryngeal mask than by conventional bag-mask ventilation and laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 2007;107:570-6.
33. Mort TC. Complications of emergency tracheal intubation: immediate airway-related consequences: part II. J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:208-15.
34. Petrini F. Airway management and guideline implementation: the gap from research to daily practice. Minerva Anes- tesiol 2008;74:449-50.
35. Jankouskas T, Bush MC, Murray B, Rudy S, Henry J, Dyer AM et al. Crisis resource management: evaluating outcomes of a multidisciplinary team. Simul Healthc 2007;2:96-101.
36. Rall M, Dieckmann P. Safety culture and crisis resource management in airway management: general principles to enhance patient safety in critical airway situations. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005;19:539-57.
37. Zamperetti N, Mazzon D, Orsi L, Barneschi MG, Marsili M, Rossi C et al. Ethics Commission of the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care. Managing intensive supports. The attitudes of the health care workers of five Italian Hospitals to institution of CPR and admission to the ICU. Minerva Anestesiol 2007;73:119-27.