Perceived sufficiency of full-field digital mammograms with and without irreversible image data compression for comparison with next-year mammograms

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 66-74

  Destounis, Stamatia ^a   Somerville, Patricia ^a   Murphy, Philip ^a   Seifert, Posy ^a  

^a Elizabeth Wende Breast Care LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

data compression; Digital mammography; image compression; lossless compression; mammogram wavelet processing; PACS

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSED IMAGES; COMPRESSION ALGORITHMS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EFFECT ANALYSIS; FILE SIZES; FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; IMAGE DATA COMPRESSION; LOSSLESS; LOSSLESS COMPRESSION; MAMMOGRAM WAVELET PROCESSING; PACS; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHMS; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE COMPRESSION; MAMMOGRAPHY; X RAY SCREENS;

DATA COMPRESSION;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA COMPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 79751538762     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9277-6     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. M Zuley 2007 How to transition to digital mammography J Am Coll Radiol 4 178 183 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.09.004 17412259
2. J Parikh 2005 Digital mammography: current capabilities and obstacles J Am Coll Radiol 2 759 767 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.02.013 17411924 (Pubitemid 41219308)
3. MM Sung HJ Kim EK Kim JY Kwak JK Yoo HS Yoo 2002 Clinical evaluation of JPEG2000 compression for digital mammography IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49 827 832 10.1109/TNS.2002.1039571 (Pubitemid 35311909)
4. M Penedo M Souto PG Tahoces, et al. 2005 Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms Radiology 237 450 457 10.1148/radiol.2372040996 16244253 (Pubitemid 41507879)
5. S Suryanarayanan A Karellas S Vedantham SM Waldrop CJ D'Orsi 2005 Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms Radiology 236 31 36 10.1148/radiol.2361040741 15983071 (Pubitemid 40853291)
6. M Trambert 2006 Digital mammography integrated with PACS: real world issues, considerations, workflow solutions, and reading paradigms Semin Breast Dis 9 75 81 10.1053/j.sembd.2006.12.006 (Pubitemid 46186073)
7. D Avrin R Morin D Piraino, et al. 2006 Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression J Am Coll Radiol 3 609 614 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.006 17412135 (Pubitemid 44118857)
8. NA Obuchowski HE Rockette 1995 Hypothesis testing of diagnostic accuracy for multiple readers and multiple tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations Commun Stat, Part B: Simul Comput 24 285 308 10.1080/ 03610919508813243
9. NA Obuchowski 1995 Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations Acad Radiol 2 suppl 1 S22 S29 9419702 discussion S57-S64, S70-S71 pas
10. D Schreiber 2003 Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression Radiol Manage 25 36 39 14603591