How to Transition to Digital Mammography

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 178-183

  Zuley, Margarita ^a  

^a Elizabeth Wende Breast Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

breast radiography; digital images; display; PACS; radiography; technology; work flow

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW;

EID: 33847207521     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 1773-1783
2. Skaane P., Young K., and Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology 229 (2003) 877-884
3. Skaane P., and Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study. Radiology 232 (2004) 197-204
4. Lewin J.M., D'Orsi C.J., Hendrick R.E., et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR 179 (2002) 671-677
5. US Food and Drug Administration. Classify your medical device. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/313.html.
6. Siegel E., and Reiner B. Workflow re-design: the key to success when using PACS. AJR 178 (2002) 563-566
7. Seibert J.A., Boone III J.M., Cooper V.N., and Lindfors K.K. Cassette-based digital mammography. Technol Cancer Res Treat 3 (2004) 413-427
8. Berns E.A., Hendrick R.E., Solari M., et al. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. AJR 187 (2006) 38-41
9. Krupinski E., Roehrig H., and Furukawa T. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 6 (1999) 411-418
10. Pisano E.D., Cole E.B., Kistner E.O., et al. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223 (2002) 483-488