Storage, Transmission, and Retrieval of Digital Mammography, Including Recommendations on Image Compression

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 609-614

  Avrin, David ^a   Morin, Richard ^b   Piraino, David ^c   Rowberg, Alan ^d   Detorie, Nicholas ^e   Zuley, Margarita ^f   Seibert, J Anthony ^g   Pisano, Etta D ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Rowberg and Associates   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Elizabeth Wende Breast Clinic   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

data compression; Digital mammography; image retrieval; image storage; image transmission

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION STORAGE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 84928096050     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU report 54, medical imaging-the assessment of image quality (1996), International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda (Md)
2. Joint Photographic Experts Group. Home page. Available at: http://www.jpeg.org.
3. Foos D.H., Muka E., Slone R.M., et al. JPEG 2000 compression for medical imagery. Proc SPIE 3980 (2000) 85-96
4. Penedo M., Pearlman W.A., Tahoces P.G., Souto M., and Vidal J.J. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22 (2003) 1288-1296
5. Good W.F., Sumkin J.H., Ganott M., et al. Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms. an observer performance study. Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 1573-1576
6. Kocsis O., Costaridou L., Varaki L., et al. Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms. Eur Radiol 13 (2002) 2390-2396
7. Suryanarayanan S., Karellas A., Vedantham S., Waldrop S.M., and D'Orsi C.J. A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography. contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging 17 (2004) 64-70
8. Burgess A.E., Jacobson F.L., and Judy P.F. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28 (2001) 419-437
9. Zhoa B., Schwartz L.H., and Kijewsji P. Effects of lossy compression on lesion detection. predictions of a nonprewhitening matched filter. Med Phys 25 (1998) 1621-1624
10. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine homepage. Available at: http://medical.nema.org.
11. Clunie D. Designing and implementing a PACS-aware DICOM image object for digital x-ray, mammography and intra-oral applications. In: Blain G.J., and Horii S.C. (Eds). SPIE Proceedings Vol 3662. medical imaging (1999) PACS design and evaluation: engineering and clinical issues: paper 3662-10
12. IHE_TF_Suppl_Mammo-draft-2005-12-06.doc. Available at: ftp://iheyrl:iheyrl@ftp.rsna.org:21/IHE/Radiology/iheyrl8-2006/Technical_Cmte/TF_Supplement_Development/Draft_Supplements/.
13. US Department of Health and Human Services. FDA mammography quality standards, final rule. Fed Reg 62 (1997) 208
14. Schreiber D. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression. Radiol Manage 25 (2003) 36-39
15. Chan H.P., Lo S.C., Niklason L.T., Ikeda D.M., and Lam K.L. Image compression in digital mammography. effects of computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications. Med Phys 23 (1996) 1325-1336
16. Suryanarayanan S., Karellas A., Vedantham S., Waldrop S.M., and D'Orsi C.J. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology 236 (2005) 31-36
17. Penedo M., Souto M., Tahoces P.G., et al. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology 237 (2005) 450-457