Implicit chord processing and motor representation in pianists

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 122-128

  Trimarchi, Pietro Davide ^a   Luzzatti, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79751531740     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0292-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cohen Kadosh, R., Brodsky, W., Levin, M., & Henik, A. (2008). Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect? Cortex, 44, 470-477.
2. D'Ausilio, A., Altenmuller, E., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., & Lotze, M. (2006). Cross-modal plasticity of the motor cortex while listening to a rehearsed musical piece. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 955-958.
3. Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., & Prinz, W. (2005a). When hearing turns into playing: Movement induction by auditory stimuli in pianists. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 1376-1389.
4. Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., Brass, M., Gunter, T. C., & Prinz, W. (2005b). Action-effect coupling in pianists. Psychological Research, 69, 233-241.
5. Drost, U. C., Rieger, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Instrument specificity in experienced musicians. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 527-533.
6. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
7. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95-110.
8. Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006). Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Psychology, 53, 58-68.
9. Haueisen, J., & Knosche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 786-792.
10. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512-526.
11. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
12. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006a). The planning and execution of short auditory sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 711-716.
13. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006b). Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 269-276.
14. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2008). Action planning in sequential skills: Relations to music performance'. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 275-291.
15. Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189-1207.
16. Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Meyers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognition research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
17. Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umilta, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88, B1-B10.
18. Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenshuistra, R. M., Hommel, B., & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 39, 1274-1288.
19. Mutschler, I., Schulze-Bonhage, A., Glauche, V., Demandt, E., Speck, O., et al. (2007). A rapid sound-action association effect in human insular cortex. PLoS ONE, 2(2), e259. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0000259.
20. Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 183-198.
21. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
22. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
23. Shahin, A., Bosnyak, D. J., Trainor, L. J., & Roberts, L. E. (2003). Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5545-5552.
24. Shepard, R. N. (1982). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89, 305-333.
25. Sonnadara, R. R., Gonzalez, D. A., Hansen, S., Elliot, D., & Lions, J. L. (2009). Spatial properties of perceived pitch. The neurosciences and music III: Disorders and plasticity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 503-507.
26. Ueda, K., & Ohgushi, K. (1987). Perceptual components of pitch: Spatial representation using a multidimensional scaling technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1193-1200.
27. Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 8, 547-558.