Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V)

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 14-22

  Zraick, Richard I ^a   Kempster, Gail B ^b   Connor, Nadine P ^c   Thibeault, Susan ^c   Klaben, Bernice K ^d   Bursac, Zoran ^a   Thrush, Carol R ^a   Glaze, Leslie E ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

CAPE V; Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice; Voice; Voice assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751471281     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105)     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Awan, S., & Lawson, L. (2009). The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings. Journal of Voice, 23, 341-352.
2. Bangayan, P., Long, C., Alwan, A. A., Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (1997). Analysis bysynthesis of pathological voices using the Klatt synthesizer. Speech Communication, 22, 343-368.
3. Behrman, A. (2005). Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. Journal of Voice, 19, 454-469.
4. Carding, P. N., Wilson, J. A., MacKenzie, K., & Deary, I. J. (2009). Measuring voice outcomes: State of the science review. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 123, 823-829.
5. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.), Quantitative applications in the social science (pp. 9-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Chan, K., & Yiu, E. (2006). A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation programs for naBve listeners. Journal of Voice, 20, 229-241.
7. Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. American Journal of Medicine, 119, 166.e7-166.e16.
8. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
9. De Bodt, M. S., Wuyts, F. L., Van de Heyning, P. H., & Croux, C. (1997). Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. Journal of Voice, 11, 74-80.
10. Dejonckere, P. H., Obbens, C., de Moor, G. M., & Wieneke, G. H. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: Reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 45, 76-83.
11. de Krom, G. (1994). Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 985-1000.
12. Delyiski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., & Evans, M. K. (2005). Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis. Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Vocology, 30(2), 55-62.
13. DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39, 155-164.
14. Eadie, T. L., & Baylor, C. R. (2006). The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice. Journal of Voice, 20, 527-544.
15. Gerratt, B., & Kreiman, J. (2001). Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2560-2566.
16. Gorodetsky, R., Amir, G., & Yarom, R. (1992). Effect of ionizing radiation on neuromuscular junctions in mouse tongues. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 61, 539-544.
17. Harshbarger, T. R. (1977). Introductory statistics: A decision map. New York, NY: Macmillan.
18. Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical examination of voice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
19. Karnell, M., Melton, S., Childes, J., Coleman, T., Dailey, S.,& Hoffman, H. (2007). Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 21, 576-590.
20. Kelchner, L. N., Brehm, S. B., Weinrich, B., Middendorf, J., deAlarcon, A., Levin, L., & Elluru, R. (2010). Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: Rater reliability using the Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice. Journal of Voice, 24, 441-449. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.09.004.
21. Kelly, P. A., O'Malley, K. J., Kallen, M. A., & Ford, M. E. (2005). Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings. Health Services Research, 40, 1605-1619.
22. Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Verdolini Abbott, K., Barkmeier-Kramer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 18, 124-132.
23. Kent, R. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(3), 7-23.
24. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (1996). Perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1787-1795.
25. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (1998). Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1598-1608.
26. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. (2000). Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1867-1876.
27. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., & Ito, M. (2007). When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2354-2364.
28. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, A., & Berke, G. S. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21-40.
29. Lazarus, C. L. (2009). Effects of chemoradiotherapy on voice and swallowing. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 17, 172-178.
30. Marks, L., & Algom, D. (1998). Psychophysical scaling. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Measurement, judgment, and decision making (pp. 81-178). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Sechrest, L. (2005). Validity of measures is no simple matter. Health Services Research, 40, 1584-1604.
32. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Shrivastav, R., Sapienza, C. M., & Nandur, V. (2005). Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 323-335.
34. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
35. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
36. Verdolini, K., Rosen, C. A., & Branski, R. C. (2006). Classification manual for voice disorders-I. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Webb, A. L., Carding, P. N., Deary, I. J., MacKenzie, K., Steen, N., & Wilson, J. A. (2004). The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 261, 429-434.
38. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
39. Zraick, R. I., Wendel, K. W., & Smith-Olinde, L. (2005). The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice. Journal of Voice, 19, 574-581.