Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 124-132

  Kempster, Gail B ^a   Gerratt, Bruce R ^b   Abbott, Katherine Verdolini ^c   Barkmeier Kraemer, Julie ^d   Hillman, Robert E ^e  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice; Voice; Voice assessment

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DYSPHONIA; HEARING; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; VOICE;

AMERICAN SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; HUMANS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; UNITED STATES; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 67049108980     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017)     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barkmeier, J. (2003, November). Update on the use of the CAPE-V tool. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Chicago.
2. Barkmeier, J., Verdolini, K., & Kempster, G. (2002, November). Report of the consensus conference on auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
3. Berg, B., & Edén, S. (2003). Perceptuell bedömning av röstkvalitet hos tre organiska röststörningar-jämförelse mellan Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) och Stockholm Voice Evaluation Approach (SVEA). [Perceptual evaluation of voice quality in three organic voice disorders-a comparison between Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and Stockholm Voice Evaluation Approach (SVEA)]. Unpublished master's thesis, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
4. Callan, D., Kent, R., Roy, N., & Tasko, S. (2000). The use of self-organizing maps for the classification of voice disorders. In R. Kent & M. Ball (Eds.), Voice quality measurement (pp. 103-116). San Diego, CA: Singular.
5. Carding, P. N., Carlson, E., Epstein, R., Mathieson, L., & Shewell, C. (2000). Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 25(3), 133-138.
6. Chan, K., & Yiu, E. (2002). The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 111-126.
7. DeBodt, M. S., Wuyts, F. L., Van de Heyning, P. H., & Croux, C. (1997). Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. Journal of Voice, 11(1), 74-80.
8. Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation drillbook. Philadelphia: Harper & Row.
9. Gerratt, B. R., & Kreiman, J. (2000). Theoretical and methodological development in the study of pathological voice quality. Journal of Phonetics, 28(3), 335-342.
10. Gerratt, B. R., & Kreiman, J. (2001). Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2560-2566.
11. Gerratt, B., Kreiman, J., Antonanzas-Barroso, N., & Berke, G. (1993). Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 14-20.
12. Gescheider, G. A., & Marks, L. E. (2002). Psychophysical scaling. In H. E. Pashler & S. S. Stevens (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 91-138). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
13. Hammarberg, B. (2000). Voice research and clinical needs. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52, 93-102.
14. Hillman, R. (2003, June). Overview of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) instrument developed by ASHA Special Interest Division 3. Presented at the Annual Symposium on the Care of the Professional Voice, Philadelphia.
15. Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag.
16. Houtsma, A. J. M. (1995). Pitch perception. In B. C. J. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 276-295). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Karnell, M., Melton, S., Childes, J., Coleman, T., Dailey, S., & Hoffman, H. (2007). Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 21, 576-590.
18. Kent, R. D. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(3), 7-23.
19. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. R. (1998). Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1598-1608.
20. Kreiman, J., & Gerratt, B. R. (2000). Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1867-1876.
21. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, A., & Berke, G. S. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 21-40.
22. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Precoda, K., & Berke, G. (1992). Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 512-520.
23. Marks, L., & Algom, D. (1998). Psychophysical scaling. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Measurement, judgment, and decision making. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Oates, J., & Russell, A. (1998). Learning voice analysis using an interactive multi-media package: Development and preliminary evaluation. Journal of Voice, 12, 500-512.
25. Shrivastav, R. (2006). Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: Individual differences in perception. Journal of Voice, 20, 211-222.
26. Shrivastav, R., Kempster, G., & Zraick, R. (2006, November). Now hear this: Improving perceptual evaluations of voice quality. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Miami Beach, FL.
27. Shrivastav, R., Sapienza, C. M., & Nandur, V. (2005). Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 323-335.
28. Wilson, D. K. (1987). Voice problems of children (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
29. Zraick, R., Klaben, B., Connor, N., Thibeault, S., Glaze, L., Thrush, C., & Bursac, Z. (2007, November). Results of the CAPE-V validation study. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Boston.
30. Zwicker, E., Fastl, H., & Frater, H. (1999). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. New York: Springer-Verlag.