Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis

Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 55-62

  Deliyski, Dimitar D ^a   Shaw, Heather S ^a   Evans, Maegan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic voice analysis; Fundamental frequency; Perturbation; Sampling rate; Voice assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MICROPHONE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIO WAVES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION BIAS; SEX FACTORS; SOFTWARE; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; UNITED STATES; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 26444522274     PISSN: 14015439     EISSN: 16512022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1401543051006721     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kent RD, Ball MJ. Voice quality measurement. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 2000.
2. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 2000.
3. Kent RD, Vorperian HK, Duffy JR. Reliability of Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the analysis of voice samples of subjects with dysarthria. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1999; 8(2):129-36.
4. Titze IR. Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement. Iowa City, IA: National Center for Voice and Speech; 1995.
5. Scherer RC, Vail VJ, Guo CG. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38(6):1260-9.
6. Titze IR, Winholtz WS. Effects of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(6):1177-90.
7. Ingrisano DR-S, Perry CK, Jepson KR. Environmental noise: a threat to automatic voice analysis. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 1998;7(1):91-6.
8. Perry CK, Ingrisano DR, Palmer MA, McDonald EJ. Effects of environmental noise on computer-derived voice estimates from female speakers. J Voice. 2000;14(2):146-53.
9. Carson CP, Ingrisano DR, Eggleston KD. The effect of noise on computer-aided measures of voice: a comparison of CSpeechSP and the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program software using the CSL 4300B module and Multi-Speech for Windows. J Voice. 2003;17(1):12-20.
10. Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK. Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice. 2005;19(1):15-28.
11. Deliyski DD, Evans MK, Shaw HS. Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice. 2005; 19(2): 176-186.
12. Titze IR, Liang H. Comparison of Fo extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(6):1120-33.
13. Titze IR, Horii Y, Scherer RC. Some technical considerations in voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30(2):252-60.
14. Deem JF, Manning WH, Knack JV, Matesich JS. The automatic extraction of pitch perturbation using microcomputers: Some methodological considerations. J Speech Hear Res. 1989;32(3):689-97.
15. Kay Elemetrics Corp. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) model 5105, version 2.0: Software instruction Manual. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp; 1999.
16. Deliyski, DD. Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. Proceedings: 3rd International Conference on Speech Communication and Technology EuroSpeech'93. Berlin, Germany, 1993;3:1969-72. www.isca-speech.org/archive/eurospeech_1993/
17. Boersma, P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings: Institute of Phonetic Sciences. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1993;17:97-110. www.fon.hum.uva.ne/Proceedings/ Proceedings_17_contents.html
18. Boersma P, van Heuven V. PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International. 2001;5(9/10): 341-5.
19. Milenkovic P. Least mean square measures of voice perturbation. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30(4):529-38.
20. Milenkovic P. TF32 User's Manual. Madison, WI: Paul Milenkovic; 2001.
21. Stemple J, Glaze L, Klaben B. Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management. Scranton, PA: Thomson: Delmar Learning; 2000.
22. Kay Elemetrics Corp. Computerized Speech Lab (CSL) model 4400: Hardware Installation, Instruction and Maintenance Manual. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp; 2001.