Ant-plant interaction in the Neotropical savanna: Direct beneficial effects of extrafloral nectar on ant colony fitness

Population Ecology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 327-332

  Byk, Jonas ^a   Del Claro, Kleber ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cephalotes; Chamaecrista; Colony growth rate; Mutualism; Tropical

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ANT; COLONY; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EGG; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; LEGUME; MUTUALISM; NECTAR; NEOTROPICAL REGION; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; REPRODUCTION; SAVANNA; SURVIVAL;

CEPHALOTES; CEPHALOTES PUSILLUS; CHAMAECRISTA; FORMICIDAE; MYRMICINAE;

EID: 79551604918     PISSN: 14383896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-010-0240-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53: 229-232.
2. Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitia W, Jaffe K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W (2000) How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240.
3. Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2004a) Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 29: 418-429.
4. Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K (2004b) Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 27: 344-358.
5. Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Anderson KE, Blanchette CA (2005) What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology 86: 528-537.
6. Bronstein JL (1998) The contribution of ant-plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica 30: 150-161.
7. Byk J, Del-Claro K (2010) Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: a new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. Acta Ethol 13: 33-38.
8. Clement LW, Köppen SCW, Brand WA, Heil M (2008) Strategies of a parasite of the ant-Acacia mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 953-962.
9. Cushman JH, Beattie A (1991) Mutalisms: assessing the benefits to hosts and visitors. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 193-195.
10. Cushman JH, Rashbrook VK, Beattie AJ (1994) Assessing benefits to both participants in a Lycaenid-ant association. Ecology 75: 1031-1041.
11. Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology: a practical approach (the practical approach series). Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23: 484-490.
13. Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300: 969-972.
14. Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2000) Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia 124: 156-165.
15. Del-Claro K, Santos JC, Júnior ADS (2002) Etograma da formiga arborícola Cephalotes pusillus (Klug, 1824) (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Rev Etol 4: 31-40 (in Portuguese with English abstract).
16. Fiedler KL, Saam C (1995) Ants benefit from attending facultatively myrmecophilous Lycaenidae caterpillars: evidence from a survival study. Oecologia 104: 316-322.
17. Fokuhl G, Heinze J, Poschlod P (2007) Colony growth in Myrmica rubra with supplementation of myrmecochorous seeds. Ecol Res 22: 845-847.
18. Gammans N, Bullock JM, Schonhogge K (2005) Ants benefit in a seed dispersal mutualism. Oecologia 146: 43-49.
19. González-Teuber M, Heil M (2009) Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Sign Behav 4: 809-813.
20. Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 425-453.
21. Heil M, Fiala B, Baumann B, Linsenmair KE (2000) Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius. Funct Ecol 14: 749-757.
22. Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Lisenmair KE (2001) Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1083-1088.
23. Irwin HS, Barneby R (1982) The American Cassinae A synoptical revision of Leguminosae tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassinae in The New World. Mem New York Bot Gard 35: 1-918.
24. Janzen DH (1975) Pseudomyrmex nigropilosa: a parasite of a mutualism. Science 188: 936-937.
25. Kearns CA, Inouye D (1993) Techniques for pollinations biologists. Colorado University Press, Niwot.
26. Keeler KH (1978) Insects feeding at extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Entomol News 89: 163-168.
27. Koptur S (1992) Extrafloral nectary mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays E (ed) Insect-plant interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81-129.
28. Korndörfer AP, Del-Claro K (2006) Ant defense versus induced defense in Lafoensia pacari (Lythraceae), a myrmecophilous tree of the Brazilian cerrado. Biotropica 38: 786-788.
29. Lach L, Hobbs ER, Majer EJD (2009) Herbivory-induced extrafloral nectar increases native and invasive ant worker survival. Popul Ecol 51: 237-243.
30. Letorneau DK (1990) Code of ant-plant mutualism broken by parasite. Science 248: 215-217.
31. Morales MA, Heithaus ER (1998) Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology 79: 734-739.
32. Nascimento EA, Del-Claro K (2010) Ant visitation to extrafloral nectaries decreases herbivory and increases fruit set in Chamaecrista debilis (Fabaceae) in a Neotropical savanna. Flora. doi: 10. 1016/j. flora. 2009. 12. 040.
33. O'Dowd DJ, Catchpole EA (1983) Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp.-ant interactions. Oecologia 59: 191-200.
34. Ohgushi T (2008) Herbivore-induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non-trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions. Entomol Exp App 128: 217-229.
35. Powell S (2008) Ecological specialization and the evolution of a specialized caste in Cephalotes ants. Funct Ecol 22: 902-911.
36. Pulice CE, Packer AA (2008) Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectar production in Prunus avium. Funct Ecol 22: 801-807.
37. Rashbrook VK, Compton SG, Lawton JH (1992) Ant-herbivore interactions: reasons for the absence of benefits to a fern with foliar nectaries. Ecology 73: 2167-2174.
38. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
39. Rico-Gray V, Palacios-Rios M, Garcia-Franco JG, Mackay WP (1998) Richness and seasonal variation of ant-plant associations mediated by plant-derived food resources in the semiarid Zapotitlan Valley, Mexico. Am Mid Nat 140: 21-26.
40. Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FS, Barbosa NP, Diniz L, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T (2009) Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 160: 537-549.
41. Rudgers JA, Gardner MC (2004) Extrafloral nectar as a resource mediating multispecies interactions. Ecology 85: 1495-1502.
42. Rutter MT, Rausher MD (2004) Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58: 2657-2668.
43. Sachs JL, Simms EL (2006) Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 585-592.
44. Sendoya SF, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2009) Egg-laying butterflies distinguish predaceous ants by sight. Am Nat 174: 134-140.
45. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9: 912-919.
46. Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.