Shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-74

  Sfondrini, Maria Francesca ^b   Gatti, Sara ^b   Scribante, Andrea ^a  

^a FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ORTHOSOLO; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; TRANSBOND XT; WATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENAMEL; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CURING LIGHTS, DENTAL; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 79551553894     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq041     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Årtun J, Bergland S 1984 Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 333-340
2. Badawi H M, Toogood R W, Carey J P, Heo G, Major P W 2008 Torque expression of self-ligating brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 721-728
3. Baek S H, Kim N Y, Paeng J Y, Kim M J 2008 Trifocal distraction- compression osteosynthesis in conjunction with passive self-ligating brackets for the reconstruction of a large bony defect and multiple missing teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 601-611
4. Barkmeier W W, Erickson R L 1994 Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. American Journal of Dentistry 7: 175-179
5. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini M F, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C 2003 Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 633-640
6. Chalgren R, Combe E C, Wahl A J 2007 Effects of etchants and primers on shear bond strength of a self-ligating esthetic orthodontic bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132: 577.e1-e5
7. Elekdag-Turk S, Cakmak F, Isci D, Turk T 2008 12-month self-ligating bracket failure rate with a self-etching primer. Angle Orthodontist 78: 1095-1100
8. Fox N A, McCabe J F, Buckley J G 1994 A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. British Journal of Orthodontics 21: 33-43
9. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Camporesi M, Barbato E 2008 Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 87-90
10. Gandini P, Orsi L, Bertoncini C, Massironi S, Franchi L 2008 In vitro frictional forces generated by three different ligation methods. Angle Orthodontist 78: 917-921
11. Harradine N W 2003 Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? Journal of Orthodontics 30: 262-273
12. Jobalia S B, Valente R M, de Rijk W G, BeGole E A, Evans C A 1997 Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic cement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 205-208
13. Matarese G et al. 2008 Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 133: 708-715
14. Millett D T, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J 1999 Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthodontist 69: 58-63
15. Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C 2008 Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. European Journal of Orthodontics 30: 233-238
16. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T 1983 Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. Journal of Dental Research 62: 1076-1081
17. Northrup R G, Berzins D W, Bradley T G, Schuckit W 2007 Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthodontist 77: 701-706
18. Oesterle L J, Shellhart W C, Belanger G K 1998 The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 114: 514-519
19. Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C 2008a Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthodontist 78: 1030-1034
20. Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T 2008b Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 11: 211-215
21. Reynolds I R 1975 A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British Journal of Orthodontics 2: 171-178