Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 58-64

  Millett, D T ^a   Cattanach, D ^a   McFadzean, R ^a   Pattison, J ^a   McColl, J ^b  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ball mill; Compomer; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DYRACT; FUJI ORTHO LC; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC CEM; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; RIGHT-ON; SILICATE; STAINLESS STEEL; TRANSBOND; ZINC OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RIGHT ON; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIVES; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; EVALUATION STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; STAINLESS STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0345854721     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853.
2. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments. Progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901-912.
3. Zachrisson BU. A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173-189.
4. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: A review of clinical failure rates. J Dent 1983;11:231-236.
5. Cartensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etch times. Am J Orthod 1986;89:70-72.
6. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RC, Newcomb RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:476-483.
7. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod 1978;74:197-206.
8. Millett DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right-On). Eur J Orthod 1994;16:203-211.
9. Lovius BB, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light-activated bonding material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod 1987;16:11-20.
10. O'Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: An in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:348-351.
11. Cooper RB, Goss M, Hamula W. Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive precoated brackets. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:477-479.
12. Ash S, Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets: A comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod 1996;23:325-329.
13. Thompson RE, Way DC. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 1981;79:282-295.
14. Brown CRL, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:663-671.
15. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;77:269-283.
16. Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arenas J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94:68-73.
17. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;92:33-40.
18. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: An overview. Br J Orthod 1992;19:199-205.
19. Hotz P, McLean JW, Sced I, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br Dent J 1977;142:41-47.
20. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement: A review. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:385-399.
21. Östman-Andersson E, Marcusson A, Horstedt P. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface after debonding following the use of glass ionomer cement and acrylic resins for bracket bonding. Swed Dent J 1993;17:139-146.
22. Fox NA. FIuoride release from orthodontic bonding materials: An in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1990;17:293-298.
23. Ashcraft DB, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. Fluoride release and shear bond strength of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997;111:260-265.
24. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J 1991;15:253-258.
25. Creanor SL, Carruthers LMC, Saunders WP, Strang R, Foye RH. Fluoride uptake and release characteristics of glass ionomer cements. Caries Res 1994;28:322-328.
26. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: An in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991;18:125-130.
27. Miller JR, Mancl L, Arbuckle G, Baldwin J, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1996; 66:309-312.
28. Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:373-384.
29. Miller RA. A light-cured hybrid compomer for bonding to impacted canines. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:331-333.
30. Salama FS, Pedo C, El-Mallakh BF. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel. Paed Dent 1997;19:267-272.
31. Jumlongras D, White GE. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997;21:223-229.
32. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:231-236.
33. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new self-curing hybrid glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:315-318.
34. Komori A, Ishikawa H. Evaluation of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod 1997;67:189-196.
35. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent 1997;25:243-249.
36. Millett D, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic bracket applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1993;20:117-122.
37. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etching enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-340.
38. Millett DT, McCabe JF, Bennett TG, Carter NE, Gordon PH. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 1995;22:161-169.
39. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1995;22:319-323.
40. Abu Kasim NH, Millett DT, McCabe JF. The ball mill as a means of investigating the mechanical failure of dental materials. J Dent 1996;24:117-124.
41. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951;18:293-297.
42. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. The treatment of results for tensile bond strength testing. J Dent 1986;14:165-168.
43. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. A statistical approach to the mechanical testing of dental materials. Dent Mater 1986;2:139-142.
44. Compton AM, Meyers CE, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer and a chemically cured glass ionomer for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:138-144.
45. Durning P, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. A laboratory investigation into cements used to retain orthodontic bands. Br J Orthod 1994;21:27-32.
46. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994;21:33-43.
47. Smith DC. Dental cements - current status and future properties. Dent Clin North Am 1983;83:763-792.
48. Chamda RA, Stein E. Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems. An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthod 1996;110:378-382.
49. Osterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. Effect of tacking time on bond strength of light-cured adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1997;31-449-453.
50. Tarasiewicz A, Radzisewski P. Ball mill simulation. Part I. A kinetic model of ball mill charge motion. Trans Soc Comput Simul 1989;6:61-74.
51. Tarasiewicz A, Radzisewski P. Ball mill simulation. Part II. Numerical solution to ball charge model. Trans Soc Comput Simul 1989;6:75-88.