Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1030-1034

  Pandis, Nikolaos ^a   Eliades, Theodore ^b,c   Partowi, Samira ^a   Bourauel, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^c NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Moments; Rotational displacement; Self ligating brackets

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TORQUE;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; NICKEL; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TORQUE;

EID: 43049108989     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/110307-516.1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hanson H. The SPEED system: a report on the development of a new edgewise appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1980;78:243-265.
2. Voudouris JC, Kufttinec MM. Excellence and Efficiency: Interactive Twin Self-ligation. Toronto, Canada: Self-ligating Technology Publications; 2006.
3. Damon DH. The Damon low friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:670-680.
4. Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472-480.
5. Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod. 2003;30:262-273.
6. Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket's self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:219-228.
7. Berger JL. The SPEED appliance: a 14-year update on this unique self-ligating orthodontic mechanism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:217-223.
8. Iwasaki LR, Beatty MW, Randall CJ, Nickel JC. Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel archwire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:408-415.
9. Drenker E. Calculating continuous archwire forces. Angle Orthod. 1988;58:59-70.
10. Bourauel C, Drescher D, Thier M. An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics. J Biomed Eng. 1992;14:371-378.
11. Damon DH. System Archwire Sequence in the Damon System: The Workbook. 2nd ed. Glendora, CA: Ormco; 2002.
12. Sander C, Sander FM, Sander FG. The derotation of premolars and canines with NiTi elements. J Orofac Orthop. 2006;67:117-126.
13. Schudy GF, Schudy FF. Intrabracket space and interbracket distance: critical factors in clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:281-294.
14. Taloumis LJ, Smith TM, Hondrum SO, Lorton L. Force decay and deformation of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:1-11.
15. Rock WP, Wilson HJ. The effect of bracket type and ligation method upon forces exerted by orthodontic archwires. Br J Orthod. 1989;16:213-217.
16. Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW. The influence of bracket design on moment production during axial rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:254-261.