Group assessment: Comparing group and individual undergraduate module marks

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 141-148

  Almond, Richard J ^a  

^a Mountjoy Research Centre 4   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Group work; Summative assessment; Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551552014     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930801956083     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bacon, D.R. 2005. The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education 29, no. 2: 248-67.
2. Bennett, N., E. Dunne, and C. Carre. 2000. Skills development in higher education and employment. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
3. Burd, E., S. Drummond, and B. Hodgson. 2003. Using peer & self assessment for group work. Proceedings of the 4th Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, August, in NUI, Galway.
4. Burdett, J. 2003. Making groups work: University students' perceptions. International Education Journal 4, no. 3: 177-91.
5. Candy, P.C., G. Crebert, and J. O'Leary. 1994. Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
6. Dearing, R. 1997. The National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/docsinde.htm.
7. Downie, N. 2001. Assessing group work in higher education. http://www.cap.ntu.ac.uk/pages/Innsample.htm/pdfs/2001.pdf.
8. Falchikov, N. 1986. Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 11, no. 2: 146-66.
9. Gibbs, G. 1995. Learning in teams: A tutor guide. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.
10. Harris, D., and C. Bell. 1994. Evaluating and assessing for learning. rev. ed. London: Kohan Page.
11. Lejk, M., M. Wyvill, and S. Farrow. 1997. Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher education in the UK: Results of a survey. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22, no. 1: 81-91.
12. Lejk, M., M. Wyvill, and S. Farrow. 1999. Group assessment in systems analysis and design: A comparison of the performance of streamed and mixed-ability groups. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24, no. 1: 5-14.
13. LTSN.mathstore. 2004. Guidelines for introducing group work in undergraduate mathematics. http://ltsn.mathstore.ac.uk/projects/groupwork/intro.htm.
14. McCorkle, D.E., J. Reardon, J.F. Alexander, N.D. King, R.C. Harris, R. Vishwanathan Iyer. 1999. Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education 21, no. 2: 106-17.
15. Morris, R., and C. Hayes. 1997. Small group work: Are group assignments a legitimate form of assessment? In Learning through teaching, ed. R. Pospisil and L. Willcoxson, 229-33. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University, Perth, February 1997.
16. Nielsen, A.R.S.A.C. 2000. Employer satisfaction with graduate skills. Report prepared for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs Australia.
17. Pitt, M.J. 2000. The application of games theory to group project assessment. Teaching in Higher Education 5, no. 2: 233-41.
18. Thorley, L., and R. Gregory. 1994. Using group-based learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.