Group assessment in systems analysis and design: A comparison of the performance of streamed and mixed-ability groups

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 5-14

  Lejk, Mark ^a   Wyvill, Michael ^a   Farrow, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346141145     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293990240101     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BRUFEE, K. A. (1993) Collaborative Learning: higher education, interdependence and the authority of knowledge (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).
2. FALCHIKOV, N. (1988) Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability, Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 25(4), pp. 327-339.
3. FALCHIKOV, N. (1991) Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group, in: S. BROWN & P. DOVE (Eds) Self and peer assessment, Paper No. 63, Standing Conference on Educational Development.
4. FALCHIKOV, N. (1993) Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group, Educational and Training Technology International, 30(3), pp. 275-284.
5. GIBBS, G. (1995) Assessing Student Centred Courses (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Staff Development).
6. GOLDFINCH, J. & RAESIDE, R. (1990) Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), pp. 210-231.
7. GOLDFINCH, J. (1994) Further developments in peer assessment of group projects, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 29-35.
8. GOLDFINCH, J. & WINDLE, D. (1994) Getting the most from assignments, in: K. HOUSTON (Ed.) Innovations in Mathematics Teaching (Birmingham, Staff and Educational Development Association (SEDA)).
9. JOHNSON, D. W. & JOHNSON, R. T. (1989) Co-operation and Competition: theory and research (Edina, MN, Interaction Book Company).
10. LEJK, M. (1996) Learning together, The New Academic, 5(3), pp. 6-7.
11. LEJK, M., WYVILL, M. & FARROW, S. (1996) A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 267-280.
12. LEJK, M., WYVILL, M. & FARROW, S. (1997) Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher education in the UK: results of a survey, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), pp. 81-91.
13. MELLO, J. A. (1993) Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings, Journal of Management Education, 17(2), pp. 253-259.
14. PALMER, J. & JOHNSON, J. T. (1989) Jigsaw in a college classroom: effect on student achievement and impact on student evaluations of teacher performance, Journal of Social Studies Research, 13(1), pp. 34-37.
15. RYSAVY, D. M. & SALES, G. C. (1991) Co-operative learning in computer-based instruction, Educational Technology Research & Development, 39(2), pp. 70-79.
16. SCHECHTMAN, Z. (1992) Interrater reliability of a single group assessment procedure administered in several educational settings, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, pp. 31-39.
17. SHARAN, S. (1980) Co-operative learning in small groups: recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations, Review of Educational Research, 50, pp. 241-272.
18. SLAVIN, R. E. (1990) Co-operative Learning: theory, research, and practice (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).